(10-30-2013 06:18 AM)emu79 Wrote: Our new AD needs to be careful here and not to indulge in Ohio State favoritism. We need a complete open and transparent search for the next coach with out any bias.
Some Ohio St assistants have done well (Toledo) and others are now struggling (Kent St.)
I'm not sure you have your fact correct.
Tim Beckman (OSU-Toledo) did very well.
Darrell Hazell (OSU -Kent) did very well.
I can add that maybe the best MAC coach in decades, Urban Meyer, was an assistant coach at Notre Dame when hired by BG.
That said, the idea of saying that anyone has evidence that assistant coaches or coordinators have worse success outcomes when moving to a FBS HC (MAC) position than say FCS (or even D-II) HCs, simply is not true.
This is simply anecdotal evidence which along with a dollar will buy a donut at Dunkin Donuts. I'm one who believe anecdotal evidence is virtually worthless. One can justify any point using anecdotal evidence. In science it is what is called the N=1 paradigm (I remember reading a journal article on it for a research course). What does a case study prove? Can one generalize from the single case to the broader population?
I'm not aware of any empirical study which has attempted to measure success rates between the two classes of hires (i.e,., FBS assistant coaches/coordinators vs. FCS/D-II head coaches) at the non-AQ level.