RE: Is there any evidence that any MWC team would move to the AAC?
I wonder if the key issue being tackled right now is Aresco selling ESPN on the need to pay for 2 more western schools to convince SDSU & Boise that that this is by far the best option for now (Boise) and longer term (SDSU), from much better money to better bowl access to far better TV exposure across America to sufficient regional critical mass. Adding Colorado St, Air Force, SDSU, Boise, and 2 out of Fresno/Utah St/Nevada/UNLV in the west and UAB plus 1 of Army/Rice/Buffalo/FAU/FIU. 16 schools across all time zones for $8m per team, or $128m per year. If 2 to 4 schools leave for the Big 12, you're protected, you still have the best 12 team conference left. ESPN will pay that, it is a bargain for the amount & relative quality of content.
It would settle all of this long term. The western schools can't attract this kind of money without joining a more eastern conference. The eastern schools can't achieve more stable quality & depth of membership without the western schools. Regardless of what anyone says to the contrary, the above price is a bargain; the payout to the AAC would be no more than half the Big 12, and no amount of imagination is going to result in Baylor, Kansas, Houston, Iowa St, TCU or Cincinnati attracting twice as many eyeballs as Air Force, Navy, SMU, Memphis, SDSU, Boise, Tulane, Temple, etc.
|