There are some mythological beasts that are created but do not breed themselves. I decided to go to Wikipedia to see if the Griffin was such a creature (which, if so, means that it probably would not have even had any private parts).
Here is the Wiki link:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Griffin
Here are three interesting quotes from the article:
"In heraldry, a griffin always has forelegs like an eagle's hind-legs. A type of griffin with the four legs of a lion was distinguished by perhaps only one English herald of later heraldry as the Opinicus, which also had a camel-like neck and a short tail that almost resembles a camel's tail." --- So, since the statue has front legs of a lion, is it really an Opinicus??!!
"In British heraldry, a male griffin is shown without wings, its body covered in tufts of formidable spikes, with a short tusk emerging from the forehead, as for a unicorn. The female griffin with wings is more commonly used." --- Ho ho!! Since the statue has wings, is it a female? If so, then it certainly shouldn't have any testicles!
"The official seal of Purdue University was adopted during the University's centennial in 1969." -- Apparently that seal has a griffin. Probably of interest only to NJ Alum.
Lastly, I hope this picture shows up; if not, it is on the Wiki link. This is a really cool looking Griffin at the Farkasreti Cemetery in Budapest.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:%22Gr...dapest.jpg