(04-21-2018 09:09 PM)Love and Honor Wrote: Ok, so we kick out EMU, Kent, whoever you want. We convince Marshall, JMU, and such to replace them. Then what? Do we start to draw a minimum of 20K every game, earn every NY6 bid, win all our bowl games, and become a two-bid basketball conference? Does it change the fact that the remaining members of our conference are non-flagships in Big Ten states? It's pretty preposterous to think we have enough leverage to even pull off those changes, let alone become some dream G5 conference in reality.
The cold reality is no combination within the MAC or between the MAC and say CUSA or SBC is going to fetch more in TV money than what the MAC is currently picking up.
Competitiveness and TV money drove the WAC/MWC split. Could there be a competitive argument for putting together an 8-10 team conference out of MAC/SBC/CUSA?
North: Toledo, NIU, WMU, Ohio, WKU
South: MTSU, LaTech, SoMiss, AppSt, FAU
It doesn't seem workable to include MAC schools in it. Something like this would probably be better.
North: Marshall, WKU, MTSU, Ark St, App St
South: LaTech, Louisiana, SoMiss, Georgia St, FAU
In the south there is enough G5 schools to work with on a recombination. In the Midwest its only the 12 MAC schools.....unless UC, UConn, Temple were willing to leave the AAC to get in a conference with 4-5 MAC schools.
East: UConn, Buffalo, Temple, Navy, Ohio
West: Toledo, Cincinnati, WMU, CMU, NIU
That would be another AAC but UConn & Cincinnati prefer a conference with Texas and Florida recruiting so it will never happen.