Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
The WAC's Next Move
Author Message
Bookmark and Share
MJG Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 2,264
Joined: Aug 2013
Reputation: 30
I Root For: U I , UMich, SC
Location: Myrtle Beach
Post: #121
RE: The WAC's Next Move
(12-12-2017 02:00 PM)dbackjon Wrote:  
(12-07-2017 11:42 PM)SDHornet Wrote:  
(12-07-2017 03:36 PM)dancingNMSUaggie Wrote:  The WAC still holds that card. I think Hurd is working behind the scenes to start FBS football in the Wac again. He should approach Sun Belt and Conf USA teams that are geographically compatible and invite them over. Maybe that would entice the Montanas over too.

Doubt it. I have it on good authority that they have their eye set on sending their teams to the northern great plains.

Because a 6 1/2 hour flight to Grand Forks (pop 100,000K) is so much more attractive to send teams to than a 4 hour flight to Sacramento (pop 2.6 million), dontcha know.
Don't forget the one hour drive to Fargo.
The travel partner set up helps a lot.

Sent from my SM-J700T using CSNbbs mobile app
12-12-2017 06:11 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
SDHornet Offline
2nd String
*

Posts: 286
Joined: Jan 2017
Reputation: 7
I Root For: Sac State
Location:
Post: #122
RE: The WAC's Next Move
(12-12-2017 06:11 PM)MJG Wrote:  
(12-12-2017 02:00 PM)dbackjon Wrote:  
(12-07-2017 11:42 PM)SDHornet Wrote:  
(12-07-2017 03:36 PM)dancingNMSUaggie Wrote:  The WAC still holds that card. I think Hurd is working behind the scenes to start FBS football in the Wac again. He should approach Sun Belt and Conf USA teams that are geographically compatible and invite them over. Maybe that would entice the Montanas over too.

Doubt it. I have it on good authority that they have their eye set on sending their teams to the northern great plains.

Because a 6 1/2 hour flight to Grand Forks (pop 100,000K) is so much more attractive to send teams to than a 4 hour flight to Sacramento (pop 2.6 million), dontcha know.
Don't forget the one hour drive to Fargo.
The travel partner set up helps a lot.

Sent from my SM-J700T using CSNbbs mobile app
Irrelevant for FB.
Yesterday 12:23 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
dbackjon Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 5,121
Joined: May 2010
Reputation: 183
I Root For: NAU/Illini
Location:
Post: #123
RE: The WAC's Next Move
(12-12-2017 06:11 PM)MJG Wrote:  
(12-12-2017 02:00 PM)dbackjon Wrote:  
(12-07-2017 11:42 PM)SDHornet Wrote:  
(12-07-2017 03:36 PM)dancingNMSUaggie Wrote:  The WAC still holds that card. I think Hurd is working behind the scenes to start FBS football in the Wac again. He should approach Sun Belt and Conf USA teams that are geographically compatible and invite them over. Maybe that would entice the Montanas over too.

Doubt it. I have it on good authority that they have their eye set on sending their teams to the northern great plains.

Because a 6 1/2 hour flight to Grand Forks (pop 100,000K) is so much more attractive to send teams to than a 4 hour flight to Sacramento (pop 2.6 million), dontcha know.
Don't forget the one hour drive to Fargo.
The travel partner set up helps a lot.

Sent from my SM-J700T using CSNbbs mobile app

oooh - so they get to add the exposure for another 250K population! Add the 14K in Vermillion, and the 30K in Brookings, and now you have exposure to 400K!! (still a lot less than 2.6 Million)
Yesterday 04:15 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2017 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2017 MyBB Group.