(04-28-2015 09:32 AM)boroeagle2 Wrote:  

(04-28-2015 09:30 AM)CatMom Wrote:  Well, it was posted on Twitter & Facebook sans those bars.

Link? lol

No lie... That is the FIRST thing I thought of too.

(04-27-2015 10:41 PM)CajunExpress Wrote:  IMO this is an extraordinary young woman. She clearly is creating a reaction, and nobody knows why, but we all think about it.

As for her twenty years down the road, I doubt she will be cowed into humility and shame. Instead she will inspire her children to be free thinkers. Of course she could simply be an exhibitionist.

Agreed with everything said here. In Texas, it actually isn't a public indecency violation to walk around without a shirt and/or bra. If you take sexuality out of it, why does is a man able to walk around without a shirt, but women aren't?

(04-28-2015 12:02 PM)FoUTASportscaster Wrote:  

(04-27-2015 10:41 PM)CajunExpress Wrote:  IMO this is an extraordinary young woman. She clearly is creating a reaction, and nobody knows why, but we all think about it.

As for her twenty years down the road, I doubt she will be cowed into humility and shame. Instead she will inspire her children to be free thinkers. Of course she could simply be an exhibitionist.

Agreed with everything said here. In Texas, it actually isn't a public indecency violation to walk around without a shirt and/or bra. If you take sexuality out of it, why does is a man able to walk around without a shirt, but women aren't?

Well, I must say that some men should.

(04-28-2015 12:02 PM)FoUTASportscaster Wrote:  

(04-27-2015 10:41 PM)CajunExpress Wrote:  IMO this is an extraordinary young woman. She clearly is creating a reaction, and nobody knows why, but we all think about it.

As for her twenty years down the road, I doubt she will be cowed into humility and shame. Instead she will inspire her children to be free thinkers. Of course she could simply be an exhibitionist.

Agreed with everything said here. In Texas, it actually isn't a public indecency violation to walk around without a shirt and/or bra. If you take sexuality out of it, why does is a man able to walk around without a shirt, but women aren't?

The answer is two simple words:

Boo Bies

So milk bottles should be censored?

Men's nipples are not erotic, women's are? I get that it is. But academically, just need some clarification as to why?

(04-28-2015 12:02 PM)FoUTASportscaster Wrote:  

(04-27-2015 10:41 PM)CajunExpress Wrote:  IMO this is an extraordinary young woman. She clearly is creating a reaction, and nobody knows why, but we all think about it.

As for her twenty years down the road, I doubt she will be cowed into humility and shame. Instead she will inspire her children to be free thinkers. Of course she could simply be an exhibitionist.

Agreed with everything said here. In Texas, it actually isn't a public indecency violation to walk around without a shirt and/or bra. If you take sexuality out of it, why does is a man able to walk around without a shirt, but women aren't?

Because men are incapable of taking sexuality out of it. It's not how we are wired and it cannot be fixed. Use this thread as exhibit A.

And yes, I googled to try to find uncensored photos...

(04-28-2015 12:29 PM)FoUTASportscaster Wrote:  So milk bottles should be censored?

Men's nipples are not erotic, women's are? I get that it is. But academically, just need some clarification as to why?

Are milk bottles boobies? If you confuse the two, then I pity those Arlington women.

And why do you need clarification as to why a man's chest is not considered a sexual organ? I think it's universally understood that a man looking at a pair of ta-ta's on a woman is sexy, while the converse is not true (chicks looking at dude's man bewbs).

Same reason that a bare butt is considered sexual, but slap a piece of dental floss up the crack, and you're safe.

It's also uncensored on instagram, posted by @sanmarvelous

(04-27-2015 06:58 PM)CatMom Wrote:  Apparently this is the 3rd gal to do this in the past year

http://totalfratmove.com/whats-this-deal...te-campus/

"Someone at Texas State has something to say, and she’s taking her clothes off to do it. I received the below tip and pictures this morning"



Ummmm. so was that you Cat Mom????
If so confess now & send me a pic

(04-28-2015 12:55 PM)TheRevSWT Wrote:  

(04-28-2015 12:29 PM)FoUTASportscaster Wrote:  So milk bottles should be censored?

Men's nipples are not erotic, women's are? I get that it is. But academically, just need some clarification as to why?

Are milk bottles boobies? If you confuse the two, then I pity those Arlington women.

And why do you need clarification as to why a man's chest is not considered a sexual organ? I think it's universally understood that a man looking at a pair of ta-ta's on a woman is sexy, while the converse is not true (chicks looking at dude's man bewbs).

Same reason that a bare butt is considered sexual, but slap a piece of dental floss up the crack, and you're safe.

So women's view on sexuality are void?

So men find feet more sexy than boobs. All flip flops are banned. Some men find legs more sexy. All shorts are banned. That's what I'm getting out of this?

(04-28-2015 01:38 PM)FoUTASportscaster Wrote:  So women's view on sexuality are void?

So men find feet more sexy than boobs. All flip flops are banned. Some men find legs more sexy. All shorts are banned. That's what I'm getting out of this?

Where did I say anything about women's views on sexuality being void? I said women in general do not consider a man's bare chest to be a sexual object.

And your absurdist view about finding feet more sexy than boobs is really just... absurd.

Trying to argue about something by taking one of the most extreme views possible as a reason for it not to be is just silly.

Hooters have been considered a sexual object for centuries. Changing it now would be a monumental feet (see what I did there? Referencing the absurd argument) that would require a societal shift. That simply isn't going to happen short of podophilia becoming mainstream.

(04-28-2015 04:07 PM)TheRevSWT Wrote:  

(04-28-2015 01:38 PM)FoUTASportscaster Wrote:  So women's view on sexuality are void?

So men find feet more sexy than boobs. All flip flops are banned. Some men find legs more sexy. All shorts are banned. That's what I'm getting out of this?

Where did I say anything about women's views on sexuality being void? I said women in general do not consider a man's bare chest to be a sexual object.

And your absurdist view about finding feet more sexy than boobs [b]is really just... absurd.

Trying to argue about something by taking one of the most extreme views possible as a reason for it not to be is just silly.

Hooters have been considered a sexual object for centuries. Changing it now would be a monumental feet (see what I did there? Referencing the absurd argument) that would require a societal shift. That simply isn't going to happen short of podophilia becoming mainstream.

Rex Ryan might give you an argument on that.. .

(04-28-2015 04:07 PM)TheRevSWT Wrote:  

(04-28-2015 01:38 PM)FoUTASportscaster Wrote:  So women's view on sexuality are void?

So men find feet more sexy than boobs. All flip flops are banned. Some men find legs more sexy. All shorts are banned. That's what I'm getting out of this?

Where did I say anything about women's views on sexuality being void? I said women in general do not consider a man's bare chest to be a sexual object.

And your absurdist view about finding feet more sexy than boobs is really just... absurd.

Trying to argue about something by taking one of the most extreme views possible as a reason for it not to be is just silly.

Hooters have been considered a sexual object for centuries. Changing it now would be a monumental feet (see what I did there? Referencing the absurd argument) that would require a societal shift. That simply isn't going to happen short of podophilia becoming mainstream.

I can't tell if that first part is serious, you are joking or playing devil's advocate. If you don't think women as a whole find a chest sexually desirous...

As for feet, true. Porn is about the general gauge of sexual desire and there's a boat load of foot porn out there.

Notice you said nothing about legs....

And finally, breasts are not a universal sexual symbol. It has only emerged the last couple of hundred years. Tribal people, even today and virtually every continent still live "topless" and see no sexual sign.

Definitely the off season......

(04-28-2015 05:31 PM)USAJag2011 Wrote:  Definitely the off season......

Most def

With all the this positive acclaim she has received I expect future performances as well. She'll be seen next on a stripper pole a month after graduation.

(04-28-2015 09:17 PM)GreatAppSt Wrote:  With all the this positive acclaim she has received I expect future performances as well. She'll be seen next on a stripper pole a month after graduation.

Classy. . . .

(04-28-2015 09:21 PM)Bobcat87 Wrote:  

(04-28-2015 09:17 PM)GreatAppSt Wrote:  With all the this positive acclaim she has received I expect future performances as well. She'll be seen next on a stripper pole a month after graduation.

Classy. . . .

I know you laughed.

(04-28-2015 09:17 PM)GreatAppSt Wrote:  With all the this positive acclaim she has received I expect future performances as well. She'll be seen next on a stripper pole a month after graduation.

No way that happens. you saw the photo... she doesn't have the "qualifications".

(04-28-2015 09:34 PM)TheRevSWT Wrote:  

(04-28-2015 09:17 PM)GreatAppSt Wrote:  With all the this positive acclaim she has received I expect future performances as well. She'll be seen next on a stripper pole a month after graduation.

No way that happens. you saw the photo... she doesn't have the "qualifications".

Qualifications = Feet?

. . . . Steady Arlington. . .