Quote:Flyers being distributed at a Soros-linked NGO resources center in Mexico are encouraging illegal immigrants to vote for President Joe Biden when they get to the US.

The flyers obtained by Muckraker.com stated, “You do not need documentary proof of citizenship to register to vote. You can vote if you simply swear you are eligible." This flyer obviously seeks to prey on unsophisticated illegals and encourages them to illegally vote.

Muckraker discovered the flyers in a Resource Center Matamoras (RCM) location. The flyers were being distributed to illegal immigrants who use RCM assistance in coming to the US and were even found on the walls of port-a-potties at the location.

In a recorded conversation after being told by a journalist for Muckraker that they were “just trying to help as many people as possible before Trump gets elected,” RCM founder Gaby Zavala laughed and said, “We are in the same boat.”

According to the Oversight Project, a watchdog group for the Heritage Foundation, Zavala was previously an organizer for La Union del Pueblo Entero (LUPE), which is listed as a partner for George Soros’ Open Society Institute.

The watchdog group noted that “RCM has significant ties to Soros-funded non-profits operating in the United States, including Save the Children, Team Brownsville Texas, and Angry Tias and Abuelas.”

“Save the Children received over $650,000 from Soros’ Open Society Foundation, and has provided grants to Team Brownsville," it added.

According to the Oversight Project, RCM is a fiscally sponsored project of the Asylum Seeker Network of Support (ASNS) whose 501c3 registration was forfeited in Texas in 2022. However, Zavala, who is the founder and executive director, continued to operate despite the forfeiture.

RCM also houses the operations of the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society (HIAS), which helps illegal immigrants enter the US and has also received numerous grants from Soros’ Open Society Foundation.

Department of Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas is a former board member of HIAS, and according to documents obtained by Judicial Watch, the embattled Biden official recently met with some of these entities, including Team Brownsville and Angry Tias and Abuelas.

Link

Just so we're clear, this is the very definition of treason.

Well, at least the real reason for the admin's immigration policy is no longer in question.

But, but, but

These things don’t happen!

REEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!

(04-16-2024 09:25 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  Just so we're clear, this is the very definition of treason.

tHeRe'S nO pRoOf

You couldn't put together a better road map of how to take down America if you tried.

Soros.

The world would be better off if a pink mist came out the back of Soros head

(04-16-2024 10:15 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Soros.

So, are you saying this is untrue?

(04-17-2024 11:05 AM)oruvoice Wrote:  

(04-16-2024 10:15 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Soros.

So, are you saying this is untrue?

So then what is the plan to get the illegals into the country and getting them to vote? Without ID and all?

Wonder how much money Oversight project makes when reporting these “issues” in Twitter? How big is this project or is it one dude in his mom’s basement?

(04-17-2024 12:59 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(04-17-2024 11:05 AM)oruvoice Wrote:  

(04-16-2024 10:15 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Soros.

So, are you saying this is untrue?

So then what is the plan to get the illegals into the country and getting them to vote? Without ID and all?

So, you have no info to refute the validity of this.

The plan to get them into the country? You're kidding, right?

@>270EVsBlueBakedInn(451) and/or moo-moo-chelle (aka big mike) if all else fails by Aug. 22, 2024 ... (AM)

(04-17-2024 04:33 PM)oruvoice Wrote:  

(04-17-2024 12:59 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(04-17-2024 11:05 AM)oruvoice Wrote:  

(04-16-2024 10:15 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Soros.

So, are you saying this is untrue?

So then what is the plan to get the illegals into the country and getting them to vote? Without ID and all?

So, you have no info to refute the validity of this.

The plan to get them into the country? You're kidding, right?

Your sarcasm detector is broken. Probably not under warranty any longer.

So for the sake of argument say they are “allowed to” walk across the border? Where they voting? Where they getting IDs? Since elections AND IDs are run by the states! doesn’t that make it state issue?

(04-17-2024 05:28 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(04-17-2024 04:33 PM)oruvoice Wrote:  

(04-17-2024 12:59 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(04-17-2024 11:05 AM)oruvoice Wrote:  

(04-16-2024 10:15 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Soros.

So, are you saying this is untrue?

So then what is the plan to get the illegals into the country and getting them to vote? Without ID and all?

So, you have no info to refute the validity of this.

The plan to get them into the country? You're kidding, right?

Your sarcasm detector is broken. Probably not under warranty any longer.

So for the sake of argument say they are “allowed to” walk across the border? Where they voting? Where they getting IDs? Since elections AND IDs are run by the states! doesn’t that make it state issue?

"Where are they voting"

Arizona, Fulton County,GA., California, Pennsylvania,New York etc;

(04-17-2024 05:28 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(04-17-2024 04:33 PM)oruvoice Wrote:  

(04-17-2024 12:59 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(04-17-2024 11:05 AM)oruvoice Wrote:  

(04-16-2024 10:15 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Soros.

So, are you saying this is untrue?

So then what is the plan to get the illegals into the country and getting them to vote? Without ID and all?

So, you have no info to refute the validity of this.

The plan to get them into the country? You're kidding, right?

Your sarcasm detector is broken. Probably not under warranty any longer.

So for the sake of argument say they are “allowed to” walk across the border? Where they voting? Where they getting IDs? Since elections AND IDs are run by the states! doesn’t that make it state issue?

Your naivete is painful.

Well, that or your ignorance.

(04-17-2024 05:43 PM)Redbanksdog Wrote:  

(04-17-2024 05:28 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(04-17-2024 04:33 PM)oruvoice Wrote:  

(04-17-2024 12:59 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(04-17-2024 11:05 AM)oruvoice Wrote:  So, are you saying this is untrue?

So then what is the plan to get the illegals into the country and getting them to vote? Without ID and all?

So, you have no info to refute the validity of this.

The plan to get them into the country? You're kidding, right?

Your sarcasm detector is broken. Probably not under warranty any longer.

So for the sake of argument say they are “allowed to” walk across the border? Where they voting? Where they getting IDs? Since elections AND IDs are run by the states! doesn’t that make it state issue?

"Where are they voting"

Arizona, Fulton County, GA., California, Pennsylvania, New York etc;

Sources to confirm please.

Meanwhile...

Quote:In 2016, North Carolina audited its elections to make sure no one voted improperly. It found that 41 legal immigrants who had not yet become citizens cast ballots. That's out of 4.8 million votes cast. Those illegal votes didn't make a difference in a single election in the state, even the smallest local race, according to the state's election board. Trump's Department of Justice later filed criminal charges against 19 immigrants for illegally voting in North Carolina.

In 2022, Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, a Republican, conducted an audit of his state's voter rolls specifically looking for noncitizens. His office found that 1,634 had attempted to register, but election officials had caught all the applications and none were actually registered to vote.

The Brennan Center for Justice, a liberal group, surveyed 44 election officials in some of the most populous and immigrant-heavy jurisdictions in the country after 2016, including Arizona, California and Texas. It found only about 30 incidents of a possible noncitizen voting out of 23.5 million votes cast in those places.

Noncitizen voting isn't an issue in federal elections, regardless of conspiracy theories. Here's why

(04-18-2024 09:52 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-17-2024 05:43 PM)Redbanksdog Wrote:  

(04-17-2024 05:28 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(04-17-2024 04:33 PM)oruvoice Wrote:  

(04-17-2024 12:59 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  So then what is the plan to get the illegals into the country and getting them to vote? Without ID and all?

So, you have no info to refute the validity of this.

The plan to get them into the country? You're kidding, right?

Your sarcasm detector is broken. Probably not under warranty any longer.

So for the sake of argument say they are “allowed to” walk across the border? Where they voting? Where they getting IDs? Since elections AND IDs are run by the states! doesn’t that make it state issue?

"Where are they voting"

Arizona, Fulton County, GA., California, Pennsylvania, New York etc;

Sources to confirm please.

Meanwhile...

Quote:In 2016, North Carolina audited its elections to make sure no one voted improperly. It found that 41 legal immigrants who had not yet become citizens cast ballots. That's out of 4.8 million votes cast. Those illegal votes didn't make a difference in a single election in the state, even the smallest local race, according to the state's election board. Trump's Department of Justice later filed criminal charges against 19 immigrants for illegally voting in North Carolina.

In 2022, Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, a Republican, conducted an audit of his state's voter rolls specifically looking for noncitizens. His office found that 1,634 had attempted to register, but election officials had caught all the applications and none were actually registered to vote.

The Brennan Center for Justice, a liberal group, surveyed 44 election officials in some of the most populous and immigrant-heavy jurisdictions in the country after 2016, including Arizona, California and Texas. It found only about 30 incidents of a possible noncitizen voting out of 23.5 million votes cast in those places.

Noncitizen voting isn't an issue in federal elections, regardless of conspiracy theories. Here's why

So, the fact that it actually happens, just not in numbers that are significant to you, should be of no concern? It should make NO DIFFERENCE if the number of voting noncitizens don't make a difference in the outcome of any individual election. That is totally not the point, at all. Given that these are random audits, some from years ago, can only lead one to statistically extrapolate that the numbers are even higher today.

Good, I hope Soros, Gates, and every other "left wing" billionaire boogie man keep throwing mega dollars trying to influence elections until it sinks into everyone's head that maybe, just maybe, Citizens United was bad and a real effort to get money out of politics would be good!

(04-18-2024 10:01 AM)VA49er Wrote:  

(04-18-2024 09:52 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-17-2024 05:43 PM)Redbanksdog Wrote:  

(04-17-2024 05:28 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(04-17-2024 04:33 PM)oruvoice Wrote:  So, you have no info to refute the validity of this.

The plan to get them into the country? You're kidding, right?

Your sarcasm detector is broken. Probably not under warranty any longer.

So for the sake of argument say they are “allowed to” walk across the border? Where they voting? Where they getting IDs? Since elections AND IDs are run by the states! doesn’t that make it state issue?

"Where are they voting"

Arizona, Fulton County, GA., California, Pennsylvania, New York etc;

Sources to confirm please.

Meanwhile...

Quote:In 2016, North Carolina audited its elections to make sure no one voted improperly. It found that 41 legal immigrants who had not yet become citizens cast ballots. That's out of 4.8 million votes cast. Those illegal votes didn't make a difference in a single election in the state, even the smallest local race, according to the state's election board. Trump's Department of Justice later filed criminal charges against 19 immigrants for illegally voting in North Carolina.

In 2022, Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, a Republican, conducted an audit of his state's voter rolls specifically looking for noncitizens. His office found that 1,634 had attempted to register, but election officials had caught all the applications and none were actually registered to vote.

The Brennan Center for Justice, a liberal group, surveyed 44 election officials in some of the most populous and immigrant-heavy jurisdictions in the country after 2016, including Arizona, California and Texas. It found only about 30 incidents of a possible noncitizen voting out of 23.5 million votes cast in those places.

Noncitizen voting isn't an issue in federal elections, regardless of conspiracy theories. Here's why

So, the fact that it actually happens, just not in numbers that are significant to you, should be of no concern? It should make NO DIFFERENCE if the number of voting noncitizens don't make a difference in the outcome of any individual election. That is totally not the point, at all. Given that these are random audits, some from years ago, can only lead one to statistically extrapolate that the numbers are even higher today.

Can we PUHLEEZE stop with the logical fallacies?!?

I'm an accountant by trade. When you balance the checking account and/or books for large entities, you frequently run into variances you can't foot. You don't break the bank to find it when it's not really effecting anything. That doesn't mean in any way that you completely ignore that there's an issue to correct.

And there is nothing to show that things are worse today. In fact, it's likely that they're better. States are continually adding new laws and improving methods to catch it.

I know I've explained the conspiracy it would need to pull it off and it's just not feasible. There is no benefit. Illegals...who are already worried about being found...aren't going out of their way to commit a felony to cast one vote that likely won't matter.