Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Does Colorado State have what it takes to get into a P5 conference?
Author Message
Statefan Offline
Banned

Posts: 3,511
Joined: May 2018
I Root For: .
Location:
Post: #61
RE: Does Colorado State have what it takes to get into a P5 conference?
(01-24-2022 06:20 PM)Sactowndog Wrote:  
(01-24-2022 12:54 AM)joeben69 Wrote:  
(01-23-2022 03:16 PM)Sactowndog Wrote:  
(01-23-2022 11:18 AM)schmolik Wrote:  
(01-23-2022 10:27 AM)AuzGrams Wrote:  Ok so they’ll block SDSU but invite Colorado State or Utah State?

Boise State, Nevada, UNLV, New Mexico would get added before USU & CSU. I really want to like CSU but their program sucks and they’re already in Colorado’s market.

Assuming academics is the reason for blocking the Cal State schools, the highest ranked USN&WR FBS schools west of the Mississippi River not in the Pac 12, SEC, or Big Ten right now (I will assume no school will leave the SEC or B1G for the Pac 12 but would leave the Big 12 or other conference for the P12). (P12 schools in ().

(6. Stanford)
17. Rice
(20. UCLA)
(22. Cal Berkeley)
(27. USC)
(59. Washington)
68. SMU
75. Baylor
79. BYU
83. TCU
(99. Colorado)
(99. Oregon)
(99. Utah)
(103. Arizona)
(117. Arizona State)
122. Iowa State
122. Kansas
136. Tulsa
148. Colorado State
148. San Diego State
162. Kansas State
(162. Oregon State)
162. Hawaii
179. Houston
(179. Washington State)
187. Oklahoma State
196. New Mexico
196. Wyoming
213. Fresno State
213. Texas Tech
227. Nevada
227. New Mexico State
249. UNLV
249. Utah State

If the Mendoza line for the Pac 12 is Wazzu, San Diego State qualifies academically as does Colorado State. Fresno State and Utah State do not along with both Nevada schools and Oklahoma State. #213 is the current USN&WR ranking of my favorite non Division 1 school, Wilkes University! If academics are the criteria (or an important one), there are certainly a few other schools that shouldn't be allowed anywhere near the Pac 12. As for why Colorado State/Utah State not blocked but Cal State schools are, it could be the Golden Rule, he who has the gold rules...

The PAC will block the Cal States forever. The irony in their academic rankings is the UC System blocked the Cal State System from offering doctoral degrees in the Legislature. So the Cal States don’t have the rankings because the PAC made sure they couldn’t.

What is more interesting is why the Big12 didn’t try to challenge the PAC in CA. The spots containing all the good players are not in the west LA/Bay Areas of the state which are too expensive for young families. South Orange County and San Bernardino and the Central Valley are where the players reside.

San Diego State University
https://carnegieclassifications.iu.edu/l..._id=122409
Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education
Basic classification
Doctorate-granting Universities
Doctoral Universities – High Research Activity (R2)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carnegie_C...iversities
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_re...ctivity%22
https://cehd.gmu.edu/assets/docs/faculty...gories.pdf

The university's (SDSU) strategic plan calls on SDSU to become an R1, premier public research university.
https://research.sdsu.edu/dri

California State University, Fresno (Fresno State)
Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education
Basic classification
Doctoral/Professional Universities
The university is classified as a doctoral university with moderate research activity in the Carnegie Classification, as of the February 1, 2016 update.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California...ty,_Fresno
https://carnegieclassifications.iu.edu/l...A%22%22%7D

University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa
Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education
Basic classification
Doctorate-granting Universities
Doctoral Universities – Very High Research Activity (R1)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_re...ctivity%22

According to the Carnegie Foundation, UH Mānoa is an RU/VH (very high research activity) level research university.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University...M%C4%81noa

https://carnegieclassifications.iu.edu/l...A%22%22%7D


Boise State University
https://carnegieclassifications.iu.edu/l..._id=122409
Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education
Basic classification
Doctorate-granting Universities
Doctoral Universities – High Research Activity (R2)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carnegie_C...iversities
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_re...ctivity%22
https://cehd.gmu.edu/assets/docs/faculty...gories.pdf
https://carnegieclassifications.iu.edu/l...A%22%22%7D

The university (BSU) has "High Research Activity" as scored by the Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boise_State_University

The problem both Fresno and SDSU face is they can only offer Doctoral degrees outside of a few exceptions (education, physical therapy) in partnership with a UC. SDSU has been fortunate that UCSD has been rather accommodating in partnership with SDSU. UCDavis has been in contrast competitive with Fresno. Both SDSU and Fresno will be challenged to further extend their research designations.

The P12 will only invite graduate research universities. USNWR rankings are meaningless because undergraduate education is not what the P12 is about - it is about hard research dollars.
01-24-2022 10:58 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Statefan Offline
Banned

Posts: 3,511
Joined: May 2018
I Root For: .
Location:
Post: #62
RE: Does Colorado State have what it takes to get into a P5 conference?
Here are the NSF rankings for research spending in the P12

5 Washington
7 UCLA
11 Stanford
27 USC
31 Cal
34 Arizona
43 ASU
46 Utah
52 Colorado
70 Washington State
93 Oregon State
154 Oregon - Oregon Health Sciences is a separate school but ranks 61 - Oregon lost a few programs to OHS several decades ago IIRC.

The average P12 school is a graduate research powerhouse. Colorado State is the ONLY other graduate research university in P12 academic territory at 65 in the NSF, and they are 63-89 in ARWU which is a broader measure of total quality output. Rice, because it is relatively small is at 125 in NSF but on quality is very high at 41-56. These two fit the P12 from an academic profile standpoint.

New Mexico is 103 on NSF research totals, and is 111-119 on the ARWU. They would be a new bottom for the P-12. Iowa State would fit the academic profile and all of the U of California schools like Riverside, SD, etc would fit, but of course that does not mean any of them even want to play football. The only school west of Texas that is not in the P-12 and would be an immediate P-12 peer is the University of British Columbia, followed by U of Alberta and Calgary which would be in the quality and research range of ASU and Colorado.

BC has a little over 5 million people and Alberta only has about 4.7 million. They are more populous than Oregon and Utah, but otherwise smaller than Colorado.
(This post was last modified: 01-24-2022 11:30 PM by Statefan.)
01-24-2022 11:21 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
AztecNation Offline
Bench Warmer
*

Posts: 212
Joined: Oct 2021
Reputation: 20
I Root For: Aztecs
Location:
Post: #63
RE: Does Colorado State have what it takes to get into a P5 conference?
With the Big12 adding BYU, I do think a western pod of 4 would be smart. Something like BYU, CSU, SDSU and one of UNLV, Boise St., Fresno St.

Personally I think CSU, SDSU and UNLV would be the 3 to pick. All in good sizeable markets (imo Big12 fans wouldn't mind visiting any of those 3 cities), CSU is in the core Big12 footprint but also west enough. San Diego and Vegas also both have large Mormon populations (Boise does too but it's a small market) which may not be very relevant to the Big12/tv partners but it would be a plus for BYU.
(This post was last modified: 01-25-2022 12:06 AM by AztecNation.)
01-25-2022 12:02 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Kit-Cat Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 10,000
Joined: Jun 2002
Reputation: 125
I Root For: Championships
Location:

CrappiesCrappiesCrappiesCrappiesCrappies
Post: #64
RE: Does Colorado State have what it takes to get into a P5 conference?
(01-24-2022 04:40 PM)Michael in Raleigh Wrote:  P5 University.

G5 athletic department.

That is a good way of stating it.
01-25-2022 02:50 AM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
billybobby777 Offline
The REAL BillyBobby
*

Posts: 11,898
Joined: May 2013
Reputation: 502
I Root For: ECU, Army
Location: Houston dont sleepon
Post: #65
RE: Does Colorado State have what it takes to get into a P5 conference?
No.
01-26-2022 02:11 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
schmolik Offline
CSNBB's Big 10 Cheerleader
*

Posts: 8,702
Joined: Sep 2019
Reputation: 651
I Root For: UIUC, PSU, Nova
Location: Philadelphia Suburbs
Post: #66
RE: Does Colorado State have what it takes to get into a P5 conference?
(01-25-2022 12:02 AM)AztecNation Wrote:  With the Big12 adding BYU, I do think a western pod of 4 would be smart. Something like BYU, CSU, SDSU and one of UNLV, Boise St., Fresno St.

Personally I think CSU, SDSU and UNLV would be the 3 to pick. All in good sizeable markets (imo Big12 fans wouldn't mind visiting any of those 3 cities), CSU is in the core Big12 footprint but also west enough. San Diego and Vegas also both have large Mormon populations (Boise does too but it's a small market) which may not be very relevant to the Big12/tv partners but it would be a plus for BYU.

If you're going with markets, Ft. Collins is in the Denver market and Colorado already covers that in the Pac 12 so CSU is worthless in terms of media. According to Wikipedia, Ft. Collins has 169,810. I'd go with San Diego State, UNLV, Boise State, and BYU then (Provo is smaller than Ft. Collins but the Mormons have a national following). This also adds two new states to the footprint in Nevada and Idaho as well as the Las Vegas and Boise markets. I'd still take a shot at Kansas (KC) though if I were the Pac 12, and their academics are better. Geography is obviously an issue but they border Colorado.
01-26-2022 07:51 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
jimrtex Offline
All American
*

Posts: 2,551
Joined: Aug 2021
Reputation: 263
I Root For: Houston, Tulsa, Colorado
Location:
Post: #67
RE: Does Colorado State have what it takes to get into a P5 conference?
(01-24-2022 06:01 PM)johnintx Wrote:  Someone upthread made a good point. CSU is a P5 school with a G5 athletic department.

It's interesting how this all played out through time. Colorado State is a similar institution to Kansas State, Iowa State, and Oklahoma State. Owing to their history as a land-grant institution, they have been using a throwback orange "A" for Aggies. However, it doesn't seem like they've attained a statewide following as KSU, ISU, and OSU have, though they are the state land-grant school. Sure, rural Colorado has been now dwarfed by the growth in the Denver metro area. But, is there a reason why, going back decades (before Denver got big), that CSU's athletic following didn't match those other schools? Is it because KSU/ISU/OSU were competing with midwest flagships in the Big 8, while CSU was competing with mountain schools?

I know it could be the culture of the state, as well, as CU's fan base is smaller than those of its historic peers.

Nonetheless, Denver is a pro market, and that extends to the rest of the state. Broncos uber alles.
When conferences were being formed in the 1920's Iowa had 2-1/2 times the population of Colorado. Iowa State is the dominant school in western Iowa except for perhaps at one time Drake. Iowa City is not that far from Illinois. So when conferences were being formed ISU, Nebraska, Missouri, KU, K-State and Oklahoma formed a conference. Note they left out OSU. ISU and Oklahoma would not be in the same conference except for the schools in the middle (for some reason they called this the Missouri Valley Conference, perhaps for the Missouri River that flows past Omaha and Columbia, and near to Lawrence).

Remember you are traveling by train. Long distance travel by not so modern cars and not so modern highways that went through every town was not fun. You don't want to get caught in a whiteout blizzard in 2022. You certainly would not in 1922.

Meanwhile CSU, joined nearby schools DU, CU, and Wyoming, along with Utah, Utah State, and BYU. Two compact clusters with a long trip over the mountains. CSU was always kind of near the bottom with Utah, CU, and DU were the top schools, with BYU up and down.

It is hard to farm in Colorado without irrigation and relatively flat land, and a short growing season because of the altitude. So agriculture tends more to ranching and wheat farming on large tracts of land, which results in lower population density. So while there is agriculture around farm towns such as Ft.Collins, Greeley, Loveland, Longmont, Fort Morgan, Sterling, etc. that might be supportive of A&M, it is a relatively small area and population. And the normal school, which is now UNC, was in Greeley.

Few people lived in the High Plains or Mountains. Denver has always been a large dominant city towards the center of the state. Pueblo was a steel town, again less likely to identify with the Ag School on the other side of Denver.

After WWII, CU left to join the Missouri Valley which changed its name to Big 7. It probably was not joining K-State and ISU, but Nebraska, KU, Missouri, and Oklahoma. These were still a long way away, but not as far as they were in the 1920s. Mentally, it would be more like BYU or Boise State to Missouri. It is sort of like adding Nebraska, or Penn State, or Maryland or Rutgers to the B1G. The states touched.

DU dropped football, leaving CSU isolated with Wyoming. When the WAC was formed, CSU, Utah State, and Montana were dumped in favor of the Arizona schools. The original WAC was New Mexico, Arizona State, Arizona, Utah, BYU, and Wyoming. NMSU, CSU, and USU were left out. Arizona State might be a land grant college but it is essentially in Phoenix. Only a few years later were CSU and UTEP added, and even then they did not play a full schedule, beginning the first year with 3 conference games, and only reaching the full seven almost a decade later, just before Arizona and ASU jumped to the Pac 8.

Colorado has always been more of basketball area rather than football. James Naismith came to Denver (to get his MD) before he moved to KU who was followed by Phog Allen. The AAU was a big event in Denver when the NBA was a tiny circuit in the northeast. There is largely not organized football at the junior high level, so the high schools produce relatively fewer players.

Because so many people have moved to Colorado after college, there is less of an alumni and booster base. The Bronco fan base is much more college-like than most NFL cities. Of the original AFL 8, they have not moved like the Texans/Chiefs, Oilers/Titans, Oakland/LA/Oakland/Las Vegas Raiders, LA/San Diego/LA Chargers.

The Patriots were ranked about here relative to:

Red Sox
Bruins
Celtics
|
|
|
V
Patriots

and might still be there if not for Tom Brady.

The Jets compete with the Yankees, Mets, Giants, Knicks, Rangers, Isles, Devils. Even Buffalo has moved out to the suburbs.

So I think the short answer is that by the time CSU got to where it is at now as an educational institution, other comparable institutions had moved on in the athletic world.
01-26-2022 11:05 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
johnintx Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 2,442
Joined: Jan 2016
Reputation: 369
I Root For: Oklahoma
Location: Houston
Post: #68
RE: Does Colorado State have what it takes to get into a P5 conference?
(01-26-2022 11:05 PM)jimrtex Wrote:  
(01-24-2022 06:01 PM)johnintx Wrote:  Someone upthread made a good point. CSU is a P5 school with a G5 athletic department.

It's interesting how this all played out through time. Colorado State is a similar institution to Kansas State, Iowa State, and Oklahoma State. Owing to their history as a land-grant institution, they have been using a throwback orange "A" for Aggies. However, it doesn't seem like they've attained a statewide following as KSU, ISU, and OSU have, though they are the state land-grant school. Sure, rural Colorado has been now dwarfed by the growth in the Denver metro area. But, is there a reason why, going back decades (before Denver got big), that CSU's athletic following didn't match those other schools? Is it because KSU/ISU/OSU were competing with midwest flagships in the Big 8, while CSU was competing with mountain schools?

I know it could be the culture of the state, as well, as CU's fan base is smaller than those of its historic peers.

Nonetheless, Denver is a pro market, and that extends to the rest of the state. Broncos uber alles.
When conferences were being formed in the 1920's Iowa had 2-1/2 times the population of Colorado. Iowa State is the dominant school in western Iowa except for perhaps at one time Drake. Iowa City is not that far from Illinois. So when conferences were being formed ISU, Nebraska, Missouri, KU, K-State and Oklahoma formed a conference. Note they left out OSU. ISU and Oklahoma would not be in the same conference except for the schools in the middle (for some reason they called this the Missouri Valley Conference, perhaps for the Missouri River that flows past Omaha and Columbia, and near to Lawrence).

Remember you are traveling by train. Long distance travel by not so modern cars and not so modern highways that went through every town was not fun. You don't want to get caught in a whiteout blizzard in 2022. You certainly would not in 1922.

Meanwhile CSU, joined nearby schools DU, CU, and Wyoming, along with Utah, Utah State, and BYU. Two compact clusters with a long trip over the mountains. CSU was always kind of near the bottom with Utah, CU, and DU were the top schools, with BYU up and down.

It is hard to farm in Colorado without irrigation and relatively flat land, and a short growing season because of the altitude. So agriculture tends more to ranching and wheat farming on large tracts of land, which results in lower population density. So while there is agriculture around farm towns such as Ft.Collins, Greeley, Loveland, Longmont, Fort Morgan, Sterling, etc. that might be supportive of A&M, it is a relatively small area and population. And the normal school, which is now UNC, was in Greeley.

Few people lived in the High Plains or Mountains. Denver has always been a large dominant city towards the center of the state. Pueblo was a steel town, again less likely to identify with the Ag School on the other side of Denver.

After WWII, CU left to join the Missouri Valley which changed its name to Big 7. It probably was not joining K-State and ISU, but Nebraska, KU, Missouri, and Oklahoma. These were still a long way away, but not as far as they were in the 1920s. Mentally, it would be more like BYU or Boise State to Missouri. It is sort of like adding Nebraska, or Penn State, or Maryland or Rutgers to the B1G. The states touched.

DU dropped football, leaving CSU isolated with Wyoming. When the WAC was formed, CSU, Utah State, and Montana were dumped in favor of the Arizona schools. The original WAC was New Mexico, Arizona State, Arizona, Utah, BYU, and Wyoming. NMSU, CSU, and USU were left out. Arizona State might be a land grant college but it is essentially in Phoenix. Only a few years later were CSU and UTEP added, and even then they did not play a full schedule, beginning the first year with 3 conference games, and only reaching the full seven almost a decade later, just before Arizona and ASU jumped to the Pac 8.

Colorado has always been more of basketball area rather than football. James Naismith came to Denver (to get his MD) before he moved to KU who was followed by Phog Allen. The AAU was a big event in Denver when the NBA was a tiny circuit in the northeast. There is largely not organized football at the junior high level, so the high schools produce relatively fewer players.

Because so many people have moved to Colorado after college, there is less of an alumni and booster base. The Bronco fan base is much more college-like than most NFL cities. Of the original AFL 8, they have not moved like the Texans/Chiefs, Oilers/Titans, Oakland/LA/Oakland/Las Vegas Raiders, LA/San Diego/LA Chargers.

The Patriots were ranked about here relative to:

Red Sox
Bruins
Celtics
|
|
|
V
Patriots

and might still be there if not for Tom Brady.

The Jets compete with the Yankees, Mets, Giants, Knicks, Rangers, Isles, Devils. Even Buffalo has moved out to the suburbs.

So I think the short answer is that by the time CSU got to where it is at now as an educational institution, other comparable institutions had moved on in the athletic world.

The old Big 6 was officially known as the Missouri Valley Intercollegiate Athletic Association. Those six flagship/land-grant schools split from the original Missouri Valley Conference around 1920. For a couple of years, Iowa competed in both the Western Conference (Big Ten) and the MVIAA (Big 6/7/8), before permanently aligning with the Big Ten. Yes, Oklahoma A&M was left out, and was in a conference with schools such as Drake and Tulsa until joining the Big 8 in 1958. Both the current MVC and the historic Big 6/7/8 trace their foundings to the original Missouri Valley Conference. The Big 12 claims a starting date of 1996, while recognizing the histories of both the Big 8 and Southwest Conference.

Arizona State is actually the historic normal school (teachers college) of Arizona. It was never a land-grant. The University of Arizona is both the historic flagship (law, medical schools, etc.) and land-grant school of Arizona. But both are now comprehensive research universities, and ASU is now a mega-school that sits barely outside the city of Phoenix in a metro area of 5 million people.

But yes, this tracks pretty much with what I thought. Basically, farming occurs in the part of Colorado east of the mountains. That's less of the state that is likely to identify with the land-grant school. Colorado was once a low-population state. Combine all that with the growth patterns (huge metro area with lots of newcomers from out of state), and sports fandom gravitates to the pro teams, especially the Broncos, who were there first and have been most successful.

So, CSU finds itself in a place where the academic side of the university outgrew the athletic side.
(This post was last modified: 01-26-2022 11:34 PM by johnintx.)
01-26-2022 11:23 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
ken d Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 17,453
Joined: Dec 2013
Reputation: 1226
I Root For: college sports
Location: Raleigh
Post: #69
RE: Does Colorado State have what it takes to get into a P5 conference?
CSU sponsors the following men's sports:

Football
Basketball
Track & Field
Golf

Does that look like a P5 school to you?
01-27-2022 08:01 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Milwaukee Offline
All American
*

Posts: 3,787
Joined: Jun 2021
Reputation: 212
I Root For: many teams
Location:
Post: #70
RE: Does Colorado State have what it takes to get into a P5 conference?
(01-23-2022 01:32 AM)46566 Wrote:  I'd say yes. I'd think they get into the Pac 12. It adds a rivalry game to the conference schedule plus it frees up ooc scheduling for both Colorado and Colorado State to schedule other schools. Assuming the PAC 12 goes to 14 and wanted 1 outlier per division then it's either Colorado State or Utah State to the Pac 12 south.

PAC 14 North
Washington State
Washington
Oregon
Oregon State
California
Stanford
Boise State (or Hawaii all sports to work week zero)

PAC 14 South
USC
UCLA
Arizona
Arizona State
Colorado
Utah
Utah State or Colorado State

It would make traveling easier kinda with at least a solid pair of teams. I'd think Boise State might be the best other option available unless they go with Fresno State or San Jose to the North.

Very interesting. Something like that could happen, because the PAC has had a penchant for having two major state schools per PAC state (ore., ore st., etc.), so it would fit their profile to add CSU & USU.

Of the two, Utah State might have a better chance than CSU, since they've had stronger football teams in recent years. CSU has to be considered one of the most likely future P5 teams - - if they can maintain a strong FB program.

Boise might be more likely to end up in the Big 12, because the PAC seems to put a priority on academics, much like the Big Ten has. For that reason, SDSU might be more likely than BSU to make it into the PAC.

Hawaii is an intriguing possibility.
(This post was last modified: 01-27-2022 12:44 PM by Milwaukee.)
01-27-2022 12:34 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
b2b Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 5,682
Joined: May 2021
Reputation: 695
I Root For: My Family + ECU
Location: Land of Confusion
Post: #71
RE: Does Colorado State have what it takes to get into a P5 conference?
(01-24-2022 07:12 PM)No Bull Wrote:  
(01-22-2022 05:34 PM)Bluedevil16 Wrote:  Good location and seems to have started putting money into their facilities. Would have to be the PAC or Big 12.

No. No. No.

1. Colorado does not care about college football
2. Colorado does not give two Shiites about Colorado State. They only care about University of Colorado Boulder.

I lived between the two schools. Less than 25 miles from CSU. You are hard pressed to find any CSU merchandise outside of Fort Collins. Colorado loves the Broncos and being outdoors and taking photos of themselves in the mountains. College football… not so much.

My wife went to CSU. This post is the truth. It's just not a big deal to them. Colorado is for people who actually partake in outdoor activities on the weekend, not watch them.
01-27-2022 12:35 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
jdgaucho Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,285
Joined: Nov 2012
Reputation: 115
I Root For: UCSB
Location: Big West Land
Post: #72
RE: Does Colorado State have what it takes to get into a P5 conference?
(01-24-2022 10:58 PM)Statefan Wrote:  
(01-24-2022 06:20 PM)Sactowndog Wrote:  
(01-24-2022 12:54 AM)joeben69 Wrote:  
(01-23-2022 03:16 PM)Sactowndog Wrote:  
(01-23-2022 11:18 AM)schmolik Wrote:  Assuming academics is the reason for blocking the Cal State schools, the highest ranked USN&WR FBS schools west of the Mississippi River not in the Pac 12, SEC, or Big Ten right now (I will assume no school will leave the SEC or B1G for the Pac 12 but would leave the Big 12 or other conference for the P12). (P12 schools in ().

(6. Stanford)
17. Rice
(20. UCLA)
(22. Cal Berkeley)
(27. USC)
(59. Washington)
68. SMU
75. Baylor
79. BYU
83. TCU
(99. Colorado)
(99. Oregon)
(99. Utah)
(103. Arizona)
(117. Arizona State)
122. Iowa State
122. Kansas
136. Tulsa
148. Colorado State
148. San Diego State
162. Kansas State
(162. Oregon State)
162. Hawaii
179. Houston
(179. Washington State)
187. Oklahoma State
196. New Mexico
196. Wyoming
213. Fresno State
213. Texas Tech
227. Nevada
227. New Mexico State
249. UNLV
249. Utah State

If the Mendoza line for the Pac 12 is Wazzu, San Diego State qualifies academically as does Colorado State. Fresno State and Utah State do not along with both Nevada schools and Oklahoma State. #213 is the current USN&WR ranking of my favorite non Division 1 school, Wilkes University! If academics are the criteria (or an important one), there are certainly a few other schools that shouldn't be allowed anywhere near the Pac 12. As for why Colorado State/Utah State not blocked but Cal State schools are, it could be the Golden Rule, he who has the gold rules...

The PAC will block the Cal States forever. The irony in their academic rankings is the UC System blocked the Cal State System from offering doctoral degrees in the Legislature. So the Cal States don’t have the rankings because the PAC made sure they couldn’t.

What is more interesting is why the Big12 didn’t try to challenge the PAC in CA. The spots containing all the good players are not in the west LA/Bay Areas of the state which are too expensive for young families. South Orange County and San Bernardino and the Central Valley are where the players reside.

San Diego State University
https://carnegieclassifications.iu.edu/l..._id=122409
Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education
Basic classification
Doctorate-granting Universities
Doctoral Universities – High Research Activity (R2)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carnegie_C...iversities
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_re...ctivity%22
https://cehd.gmu.edu/assets/docs/faculty...gories.pdf

The university's (SDSU) strategic plan calls on SDSU to become an R1, premier public research university.
https://research.sdsu.edu/dri

California State University, Fresno (Fresno State)
Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education
Basic classification
Doctoral/Professional Universities
The university is classified as a doctoral university with moderate research activity in the Carnegie Classification, as of the February 1, 2016 update.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California...ty,_Fresno
https://carnegieclassifications.iu.edu/l...A%22%22%7D

University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa
Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education
Basic classification
Doctorate-granting Universities
Doctoral Universities – Very High Research Activity (R1)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_re...ctivity%22

According to the Carnegie Foundation, UH Mānoa is an RU/VH (very high research activity) level research university.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University...M%C4%81noa

https://carnegieclassifications.iu.edu/l...A%22%22%7D


Boise State University
https://carnegieclassifications.iu.edu/l..._id=122409
Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education
Basic classification
Doctorate-granting Universities
Doctoral Universities – High Research Activity (R2)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carnegie_C...iversities
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_re...ctivity%22
https://cehd.gmu.edu/assets/docs/faculty...gories.pdf
https://carnegieclassifications.iu.edu/l...A%22%22%7D

The university (BSU) has "High Research Activity" as scored by the Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boise_State_University

The problem both Fresno and SDSU face is they can only offer Doctoral degrees outside of a few exceptions (education, physical therapy) in partnership with a UC. SDSU has been fortunate that UCSD has been rather accommodating in partnership with SDSU. UCDavis has been in contrast competitive with Fresno. Both SDSU and Fresno will be challenged to further extend their research designations.

The P12 will only invite graduate research universities. USNWR rankings are meaningless because undergraduate education is not what the P12 is about - it is about hard research dollars.

Sounds like UCSD is a shoe-in, in 15 years or so. They have the research rankings and are not a Cal State. 07-coffee3
01-27-2022 01:01 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
whittx Offline
All American
*

Posts: 2,715
Joined: Apr 2016
Reputation: 122
I Root For: FSU, Bport,Corn
Location:
Post: #73
RE: Does Colorado State have what it takes to get into a P5 conference?
(01-27-2022 01:01 PM)jdgaucho Wrote:  
(01-24-2022 10:58 PM)Statefan Wrote:  
(01-24-2022 06:20 PM)Sactowndog Wrote:  
(01-24-2022 12:54 AM)joeben69 Wrote:  
(01-23-2022 03:16 PM)Sactowndog Wrote:  The PAC will block the Cal States forever. The irony in their academic rankings is the UC System blocked the Cal State System from offering doctoral degrees in the Legislature. So the Cal States don’t have the rankings because the PAC made sure they couldn’t.

What is more interesting is why the Big12 didn’t try to challenge the PAC in CA. The spots containing all the good players are not in the west LA/Bay Areas of the state which are too expensive for young families. South Orange County and San Bernardino and the Central Valley are where the players reside.

San Diego State University
https://carnegieclassifications.iu.edu/l..._id=122409
Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education
Basic classification
Doctorate-granting Universities
Doctoral Universities – High Research Activity (R2)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carnegie_C...iversities
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_re...ctivity%22
https://cehd.gmu.edu/assets/docs/faculty...gories.pdf

The university's (SDSU) strategic plan calls on SDSU to become an R1, premier public research university.
https://research.sdsu.edu/dri

California State University, Fresno (Fresno State)
Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education
Basic classification
Doctoral/Professional Universities
The university is classified as a doctoral university with moderate research activity in the Carnegie Classification, as of the February 1, 2016 update.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California...ty,_Fresno
https://carnegieclassifications.iu.edu/l...A%22%22%7D

University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa
Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education
Basic classification
Doctorate-granting Universities
Doctoral Universities – Very High Research Activity (R1)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_re...ctivity%22

According to the Carnegie Foundation, UH Mānoa is an RU/VH (very high research activity) level research university.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University...M%C4%81noa

https://carnegieclassifications.iu.edu/l...A%22%22%7D


Boise State University
https://carnegieclassifications.iu.edu/l..._id=122409
Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education
Basic classification
Doctorate-granting Universities
Doctoral Universities – High Research Activity (R2)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carnegie_C...iversities
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_re...ctivity%22
https://cehd.gmu.edu/assets/docs/faculty...gories.pdf
https://carnegieclassifications.iu.edu/l...A%22%22%7D

The university (BSU) has "High Research Activity" as scored by the Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boise_State_University

The problem both Fresno and SDSU face is they can only offer Doctoral degrees outside of a few exceptions (education, physical therapy) in partnership with a UC. SDSU has been fortunate that UCSD has been rather accommodating in partnership with SDSU. UCDavis has been in contrast competitive with Fresno. Both SDSU and Fresno will be challenged to further extend their research designations.

The P12 will only invite graduate research universities. USNWR rankings are meaningless because undergraduate education is not what the P12 is about - it is about hard research dollars.

Sounds like UCSD is a shoe-in, in 15 years or so. They have the research rankings and are not a Cal State. 07-coffee3

Problem is they don't sponsor football and won't be anytime soon. PAC-12 won't ce calling without football and a much larger arena. If the folks in Sacramento decide that merging UCSD and SDSU makes sense, then the combined school would be admitted to the conference.
01-27-2022 01:22 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
jimrtex Offline
All American
*

Posts: 2,551
Joined: Aug 2021
Reputation: 263
I Root For: Houston, Tulsa, Colorado
Location:
Post: #74
RE: Does Colorado State have what it takes to get into a P5 conference?
(01-26-2022 11:23 PM)johnintx Wrote:  The old Big 6 was officially known as the Missouri Valley Intercollegiate Athletic Association. Those six flagship/land-grant schools split from the original Missouri Valley Conference around 1920. For a couple of years, Iowa competed in both the Western Conference (Big Ten) and the MVIAA (Big 6/7/8), before permanently aligning with the Big Ten. Yes, Oklahoma A&M was left out, and was in a conference with schools such as Drake and Tulsa until joining the Big 8 in 1958. Both the current MVC and the historic Big 6/7/8 trace their foundings to the original Missouri Valley Conference. The Big 12 claims a starting date of 1996, while recognizing the histories of both the Big 8 and Southwest Conference.

Oddly the Skyline Conference: Wyoming, CSU, CU, DU, UU, Utah State, and BYU was at least informally known as the Big 7 prior to CU leaving to join the midwestern schools. I'm not sure the MVIAA was known as the "Big 6". Perhaps it was, because that would contrast with the Big 10.

But the "Big 10" did not become the Big 10 until 1987. It was known informally as "Big 10" after Ohio State joined in 1908 and Michigan rejoined in 1917, and continued with that nickname when Michigan State replaced Chicago.
01-27-2022 01:35 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Milwaukee Offline
All American
*

Posts: 3,787
Joined: Jun 2021
Reputation: 212
I Root For: many teams
Location:
Post: #75
RE: Does Colorado State have what it takes to get into a P5 conference?
(01-24-2022 09:55 AM)Frank the Tank Wrote:  
(01-24-2022 01:14 AM)joeben69 Wrote:  in this PAC 16 scenario...
*HI gets it's sh*t together...
*Pacific coast centric conference expansion...
*Institutional academic standards entry requirements relaxed...

PAC 16 North
Boise St.
Fresno St.

PAC 16 South
Hawaii
San Diego St.

Here's the thing - I don't see that happening. The Pac-12 is nearly as snobby on academics as the Big Ten. Stanford, Berkeley and UCLA are *uber*-elite institutions, USC and Washington are right behind them at least at the graduate school level, and 9 out of 12 schools are AAU members. Washington State, Oregon State and Arizona State are legacy schools when conference realignment was almost entirely based on geography, so how they compare to any new potential schools is irrelevant.

It's one thing for the Pac-12 to entertain bringing in Texas Tech and Oklahoma State when they were *also* going to get Texas, Texas A&M and Oklahoma with them. However, there's just NFW that the Pac-12 is adding those MWC schools when they're not even opening up a key market like Texas.

Do NOT underestimate the academic elitism of the Pac-12. It's very real. Stanford is the hardest overall school to get into in the country (even more than Harvard and Yale), while Berkeley and UCLA are the two hardest public schools to get into in the country. They have *uber*-elite schools that can and will block schools based on academics.

The PAC 12 does envision itself as being a West Coast version of the Big Ten, academically.

However, they might still feel pressured to expand if all the other P5s add teams, particularly if they all become 16-team conferences.

If they were to add four teams, and to do so based on academics, one possibility is that they would add the top four available teams on this list, academically.


17. Rice (TX school, but too small? too weak, athletically?)
68. SMU (TX school)
75. Baylor (if they would accept an invitation)
79. BYU (if they would accept an invitation)
83. TCU (if they would accept an invitation)
122. Iowa State (if they would accept an invitation)
122. Kansas136. Tulsa (too small? too weak, athletically?)
148. Colorado State (not a TX school)
148. San Diego State nixed, bc a "Cal State?"
162. Kansas State (if they would accept an invitation)
162. Hawaii (not a TX school)
179. Houston (if they would accept an invitation)
187. Oklahoma State (if they would accept an invitation)
196. New Mexico (not TX, but a possible bridge to Texas)

196. Wyoming
213. Fresno State
213. Texas Tech
227. Nevada
227. New Mexico State
249. UNLV
249. Utah State


Top 4 academic schools on the list, not including any of the Big 12 schools:
Rice, SMU, CSU, & SDSU/Hawaii.


.

If the PAC-12 should come under strong enough pressure to expand, so as to become the PAC-16, which four teams do you think they would be most likely to add, assuming that none of the Big 12 schools would join the PAC?


.
(This post was last modified: 01-27-2022 02:04 PM by Milwaukee.)
01-27-2022 01:42 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Fighting Muskie Offline
Senior Chief Realignmentologist
*

Posts: 11,930
Joined: Sep 2016
Reputation: 818
I Root For: Ohio St, UC,MAC
Location: Biden Cesspool
Post: #76
RE: Does Colorado State have what it takes to get into a P5 conference?
The Big 12 should not be thinking about programs like Colorado St, Boise, Memphis, USF, or SMU right now.

The focus should be on positioning the Big 12 to swoop in and claim leftovers if and when the SEC and Big Ten move into mega conference status and absorb the stronger PAC 12 and ACC programs.

Think of the future of the Big 12 as a 3 Division Conference:

West: BYU, PAC 12 leftovers
Central: the ex-Big 8 & SWC schools
East: UCF, Cincy, WVU, ACC leftovers
01-27-2022 01:47 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
jimrtex Offline
All American
*

Posts: 2,551
Joined: Aug 2021
Reputation: 263
I Root For: Houston, Tulsa, Colorado
Location:
Post: #77
RE: Does Colorado State have what it takes to get into a P5 conference?
(01-27-2022 01:01 PM)jdgaucho Wrote:  Sounds like UCSD is a shoe-in, in 15 years or so. They have the research rankings and are not a Cal State. 07-coffee3

I think the UC system will split off into its own conference. The B1G will take ND, USC, Stanford, and UW.

The remaining 7 Pac 12 schools will merge with the Mountain West, with Hawaii becoming a full member and BYU rejoining for an even 20.
01-27-2022 01:48 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
bullet Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 66,834
Joined: Apr 2012
Reputation: 3315
I Root For: Texas, UK, UGA
Location:
Post: #78
RE: Does Colorado State have what it takes to get into a P5 conference?
(01-27-2022 08:01 AM)ken d Wrote:  CSU sponsors the following men's sports:

Football
Basketball
Track & Field
Golf

Does that look like a P5 school to you?

Well Kansas St. only adds baseball to that list.

Most of the SEC and Big 12 schools don't sponsor a lot of "excess" sports.
01-27-2022 01:52 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
jdgaucho Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,285
Joined: Nov 2012
Reputation: 115
I Root For: UCSB
Location: Big West Land
Post: #79
RE: Does Colorado State have what it takes to get into a P5 conference?
(01-27-2022 01:22 PM)whittx Wrote:  
(01-27-2022 01:01 PM)jdgaucho Wrote:  
(01-24-2022 10:58 PM)Statefan Wrote:  
(01-24-2022 06:20 PM)Sactowndog Wrote:  
(01-24-2022 12:54 AM)joeben69 Wrote:  San Diego State University
https://carnegieclassifications.iu.edu/l..._id=122409
Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education
Basic classification
Doctorate-granting Universities
Doctoral Universities – High Research Activity (R2)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carnegie_C...iversities
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_re...ctivity%22
https://cehd.gmu.edu/assets/docs/faculty...gories.pdf

The university's (SDSU) strategic plan calls on SDSU to become an R1, premier public research university.
https://research.sdsu.edu/dri

California State University, Fresno (Fresno State)
Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education
Basic classification
Doctoral/Professional Universities
The university is classified as a doctoral university with moderate research activity in the Carnegie Classification, as of the February 1, 2016 update.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California...ty,_Fresno
https://carnegieclassifications.iu.edu/l...A%22%22%7D

University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa
Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education
Basic classification
Doctorate-granting Universities
Doctoral Universities – Very High Research Activity (R1)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_re...ctivity%22

According to the Carnegie Foundation, UH Mānoa is an RU/VH (very high research activity) level research university.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University...M%C4%81noa

https://carnegieclassifications.iu.edu/l...A%22%22%7D


Boise State University
https://carnegieclassifications.iu.edu/l..._id=122409
Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education
Basic classification
Doctorate-granting Universities
Doctoral Universities – High Research Activity (R2)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carnegie_C...iversities
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_re...ctivity%22
https://cehd.gmu.edu/assets/docs/faculty...gories.pdf
https://carnegieclassifications.iu.edu/l...A%22%22%7D

The university (BSU) has "High Research Activity" as scored by the Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boise_State_University

The problem both Fresno and SDSU face is they can only offer Doctoral degrees outside of a few exceptions (education, physical therapy) in partnership with a UC. SDSU has been fortunate that UCSD has been rather accommodating in partnership with SDSU. UCDavis has been in contrast competitive with Fresno. Both SDSU and Fresno will be challenged to further extend their research designations.

The P12 will only invite graduate research universities. USNWR rankings are meaningless because undergraduate education is not what the P12 is about - it is about hard research dollars.

Sounds like UCSD is a shoe-in, in 15 years or so. They have the research rankings and are not a Cal State. 07-coffee3

Problem is they don't sponsor football and won't be anytime soon. PAC-12 won't ce calling without football and a much larger arena. If the folks in Sacramento decide that merging UCSD and SDSU makes sense, then the combined school would be admitted to the conference.

Pac's never explicitly said football was a must, AFAIK.
01-27-2022 01:59 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
jdgaucho Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,285
Joined: Nov 2012
Reputation: 115
I Root For: UCSB
Location: Big West Land
Post: #80
RE: Does Colorado State have what it takes to get into a P5 conference?
(01-27-2022 01:52 PM)bullet Wrote:  
(01-27-2022 08:01 AM)ken d Wrote:  CSU sponsors the following men's sports:

Football
Basketball
Track & Field
Golf

Does that look like a P5 school to you?

Well Kansas St. only adds baseball to that list.

Most of the SEC and Big 12 schools don't sponsor a lot of "excess" sports.

Cross country, tennis, swimming & diving?
01-27-2022 02:02 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.