(06-24-2019 08:25 PM)CardinalJim Wrote: (06-24-2019 02:04 PM)nole Wrote: There are only about 3 schools (ND, Penn State, Texas) that would add any money to the ACC. Cinci isn't close to being one of them.
Notre Dame will NEVER become a full member of The ACC. That’s a pipe dream.
Penn State isn’t worth the headache. Everything but football sucks at PSU. Don’t see their Olympic Sports adding much to The ACC Network.
Texas, on the other hand, would be an excellent associate member like Notre Dame. Their Olympic Sports would be a welcome addition to The ACC Network. Easy to roll The LHN into The ACC Network.
Agree with you.
While this thread started out as "what would Cincy accept?" thread ... I don't think my Cards will ever be in a conference with Cincinnati ever again.
I do think that the ACC is set up perfectly, to attract Texas with an ND deal.
-- Texas gets to act like a big deal by saying they're going independent in football.
-- Texas gets to associate itself with all other sports in a conference with like academic excellence (UNC, UVA, Duke, Ga Tech, etc.).
-- ACC gets to add a GIGANTIC state, that is growing faster than any other sans Florida, to it's footprint, and enjoy the marketing associated with that.
-- ACC out-of-conference schedules add traditional power Texas, like the Notre Dame deal, which increases the perception of the OOC for all ACC schools.
Ironically ... Texas doing this opens up a spot for Cincinnati to join the Big XII. Which I think they do ... and while weakened, I think the Big XII still stays in the P5, as they snatch up the top of the AAC, and MW, to fortify their league.
But I think the only way any of this happens, is if Oklahoma bolts to the SEC or Big Ten. If Oklahoma is staying put, I think Texas stays put.
And none of this matters ....