Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
ETSU to a new conference? (rumor)
Author Message
Bookmark and Share
Buccaneerlover Offline
All American American
*

Posts: 8,063
Joined: Jan 2006
Reputation: 57
I Root For: ETSU/Mid Majors
Location: Burb of MUSIC CITY!
Post: #101
RE: ETSU to a new conference? (rumor)
That and basketball teams at the traditional one bid league level have a horrible time getting home games, so from that perspective having added basketball programs is great. With that mentality the SoCon would be foolish not to add ETSU, Radford, and UNC-A. It sets up nice travel partners for games, though they've gotta find someone to travel with Chattanooga that's close.
Going back to the SoCon feels like we got grounded for a stupid decision and now we're out of detention.
03-27-2012 03:22 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Goldfinger Offline
Banned

Posts: 1,911
Joined: Feb 2010
I Root For: Restoration
Location:
Post: #102
RE: ETSU to a new conference? (rumor)
Adding unc asheville and radford is a very bad idea. Etsu would have to make some big commitments, I would think, before they would be attractive.
03-27-2012 04:09 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
RodShaw2 Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 8,648
Joined: Apr 2005
Reputation: 31
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #103
RE: ETSU to a new conference? (rumor)
(03-27-2012 04:09 PM)Goldfinger Wrote:  Adding unc asheville and radford is a very bad idea. Etsu would have to make some big commitments, I would think, before they would be attractive.

Yeah Asheville would be a terrible addition. Team on the rise, two straight NCAA appearances, a new arena and right smack in the middle of the conference footprint, no clue why the SoCon would find them attractive. Go troll somewhere else Gold, aren't you a KSU fan? so the SoCon and ETSU should hold no interest for you.
03-27-2012 04:51 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
GoBucsGo Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,935
Joined: May 2007
Reputation: 14
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #104
RE: ETSU to a new conference? (rumor)
I agree that UNCA is a great addition especially, if that's the case. I have no problem in finding other reasons to visit Beer City USA.

http://brewingsomefun.com/2011/05/10/bee...-in-a-row/
03-27-2012 05:18 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
abuc90 Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 724
Joined: Nov 2010
Reputation: 14
I Root For: ETSU
Location: JC
Post: #105
RE: ETSU to a new conference? (rumor)
(03-27-2012 03:22 PM)Buccaneerlover Wrote:  Going back to the SoCon feels like we got grounded for a stupid decision and now we're out of detention.

Spot on!
03-27-2012 10:24 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Buc'ed_Up Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,864
Joined: Feb 2011
Reputation: 8
I Root For: ETSU
Location: JC -> CLT
Post: #106
RE: ETSU to a new conference? (rumor)
There is no doubt ETSU will be leaving the A-Sun. The question is WHEN. If you consider the actions Noland has taken thus far, it's evident he is wanting to do great things for the athletic program and the university. In my opinion, I think next year will be our last year in the A-Sun.
The SoCon would be foolish to not consider us and UNC-A as possible new members. Both schools bring a respectable basketball program and a perfect travelling destination for conference games.
03-27-2012 10:58 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
HerdZoned Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 19,105
Joined: Nov 2003
Reputation: 348
I Root For: The Herd
Location: South Charleston

Folding@NCAAbbsCrappiesCrappiesCrappies
Post: #107
RE: ETSU to a new conference? (rumor)
Can I ask a few questions here as an outsider:

1) Where is Appy and GA Southern going. Neither have a conf invite somewhere else...

2) Was there another reason for dropping football besides "We can't afford it". If so what was it..
03-28-2012 12:13 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Buc66 Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,143
Joined: Nov 2010
Reputation: 21
I Root For: ETSU Bucs
Location:
Post: #108
RE: ETSU to a new conference? (rumor)
(03-28-2012 12:13 AM)HerdZoned Wrote:  Can I ask a few questions here as an outsider:

1) Where is Appy and GA Southern going. Neither have a conf invite somewhere else...

2) Was there another reason for dropping football besides "We can't afford it". If so what was it..

2. Football was dropped so that the other athletic programs could be fully funded - and that's the statement that came from Wayne Andrews of the ETSU athletic dept in 2007. And all evidence since football was dropped fully verify that. Football was never dropped due to finances. That was and continues to be THE BIG LIE.
03-28-2012 07:06 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Buc66 Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,143
Joined: Nov 2010
Reputation: 21
I Root For: ETSU Bucs
Location:
Post: #109
RE: ETSU to a new conference? (rumor)
(03-27-2012 10:58 PM)Buced_Up Wrote:  There is no doubt ETSU will be leaving the A-Sun. The question is WHEN. If you consider the actions Noland has taken thus far, it's evident he is wanting to do great things for the athletic program and the university. In my opinion, I think next year will be our last year in the A-Sun.
The SoCon would be foolish to not consider us and UNC-A as possible new members. Both schools bring a respectable basketball program and a perfect travelling destination for conference games.

Can you be specific with relation to the actions Noland has taken thus far?
03-28-2012 07:07 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Bucster Offline
All American
*

Posts: 2,915
Joined: Mar 2006
Reputation: 26
I Root For: ETSU
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Post: #110
RE: ETSU to a new conference? (rumor)
(03-27-2012 04:51 PM)RodShaw2 Wrote:  
(03-27-2012 04:09 PM)Goldfinger Wrote:  Adding unc asheville and radford is a very bad idea. Etsu would have to make some big commitments, I would think, before they would be attractive.

Yeah Asheville would be a terrible addition. Team on the rise, two straight NCAA appearances, a new arena and right smack in the middle of the conference footprint, no clue why the SoCon would find them attractive. Go troll somewhere else Gold, aren't you a KSU fan? so the SoCon and ETSU should hold no interest for you.

I agree Asheville would be a good add for the Socon probably not Radford but Asheville yes. Their basketball program is currently better than anything in the North Division.
03-28-2012 08:47 AM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Buccaneerlover Offline
All American American
*

Posts: 8,063
Joined: Jan 2006
Reputation: 57
I Root For: ETSU/Mid Majors
Location: Burb of MUSIC CITY!
Post: #111
RE: ETSU to a new conference? (rumor)
The story keeps changing, so here's several versions.

1. Back in the early 2000's, it was discussed that THEC, along with the UT/TBR would stop allowing any subsidized funding from the state to support intercollegiate athletics. Of course, this would directly affect EVERY STATE SCHOOL EXCEPT UTK. ETSU took the bait, and in a panic dropped football thinking that they couldn't have a student fee to prop it up nor would they be getting any state money to help with athletics. Of course we now know that Mullins and Stanton were moronic to do so, because the other schools raised so much hell it didn't happen. This is where Dave always saying it would be a trend and that FCS/I-AA programs are dying and we'll see more of this. He named Chattanooga and Western Carolina both. Cute.

2. We're not Title IX compliant. This one is my favorite excuse. It had so many holes it was ridiculous. They tried to tell everyone originally that the NCAA REQUIRES you to be compliant in all three prongs of Title IX. Not true, though at one time ETSU was because they dropped football. To my recollection, you only have to be compliant in one, but "working" to be compliant in all three. Mommabear could elaborate more on this, but I doubt she'll want to come back and elaborate more on it.

3. Strategic. Business. Decision. This is the one that simply will piss you off. Colleges are supposedly in the business of educating young minds, so strategically speaking they cut 53, and what should've been 63 potential scholarship opportunities to educate young minds. The claim was ETSU was LOSING 1 million dollars per year. It's a matter of terminology, the numbers simply don't add up. They weren't losing the million, it was COSTING one million per year to run football at ETSU. They were making fairly decent chunks of it back through revenue games, as you may remember Marshall doing at one time and probably to some degree still does. This is where the lies and the deceit come in that have caused such a disconnect. They, being Mullins and Stanton told donors that by DROPPING football ETSU would: Get into a premier basketball conference such as C-USA or one like it. C-USA came to campus, looked at our facilities and said to call when they're updated and ON CAMPUS. They also said ETSU would see an upgrade in all sports, upgrade is a relative term again. ETSU got into the A-Sun, and yes has won the All Sports trophy just about every year we've been there BUT, it's the Atlantic Sun. Most of the time here we've seen atleast one, if not multiple D-2 transition programs (UNF, KSU, FGCU, Upstate, NKU next year) along with programs who have largely been embarrassing in basketball (Stetson, Jacksonville, Mercer, Campbell-who left for the Big South). So while there have been some post season appearances in alot of sports, volleyball still hasn't gone to the NCAA's, women's soccer had it's first winning season in ages, you get the idea. ETSU is winning conference championships or competing for, but the thought of winning in NCAA Tournament play is a pipe dream. Less than 10 years ago it was EXPECTED that ETSU go in and be a Davidson, Murray State, VCU, Butler, etc... See the song Promises by Keith Whitley. It fits here. Oh, and they also said no additional student fees would be added to support athletics, yet they've added one and it keeps going up. ETSU's budget has gone from six million when they had football to 11 million without. Begs the question, what in the hell are they spending an additional five million dollars a year on...

4. Nobody supported it and we can't compete with UT. Funny thing to me is Appalachian competes yearly with UNC, NC State, UT, VPI, South Carolina, etc... You guys have to deal with Ohio State and WVU in Huntington, not to mention Pitt. It's a difference in attitude and mentality. It was easier to QUIT, makes excuses of why they couldn't do it instead of working to find a way TO DO IT.

5. Everybody else will dropping it. I like to bring this one up because Slappy likes to bring up the fact we shouldn't bring it back because everyone else has it or has added it. ETSU dropped it because everyone else would be according to one of the stories they've thrown out there, so since the trend is the exact OPPOSITE of what that incompetent horse's ass said, the same principle could apply.

Hope that helps.
Gold, you prove to me weekly that you're either getting crazier by the day or you're just a moron. Look at the cost of gas, one bid conferences are looking at strength in numbers, for the very reasons we've discussed on here about the instability of the A-Sun. In a world of basketball only additions, UNC-A is great. I don't know that they shouldn't look at Winthrop as well, they won't stay down forever.



(03-28-2012 12:13 AM)HerdZoned Wrote:  Can I ask a few questions here as an outsider:

1) Where is Appy and GA Southern going. Neither have a conf invite somewhere else...

2) Was there another reason for dropping football besides "We can't afford it". If so what was it..
(This post was last modified: 03-28-2012 09:07 AM by Buccaneerlover.)
03-28-2012 09:07 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Buc66 Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,143
Joined: Nov 2010
Reputation: 21
I Root For: ETSU Bucs
Location:
Post: #112
RE: ETSU to a new conference? (rumor)
(03-28-2012 09:07 AM)Buccaneerlover Wrote:  The story keeps changing, so here's several versions.

1. Back in the early 2000's, it was discussed that THEC, along with the UT/TBR would stop allowing any subsidized funding from the state to support intercollegiate athletics. Of course, this would directly affect EVERY STATE SCHOOL EXCEPT UTK. ETSU took the bait, and in a panic dropped football thinking that they couldn't have a student fee to prop it up nor would they be getting any state money to help with athletics. Of course we now know that Mullins and Stanton were moronic to do so, because the other schools raised so much hell it didn't happen. This is where Dave always saying it would be a trend and that FCS/I-AA programs are dying and we'll see more of this. He named Chattanooga and Western Carolina both. Cute.

2. We're not Title IX compliant. This one is my favorite excuse. It had so many holes it was ridiculous. They tried to tell everyone originally that the NCAA REQUIRES you to be compliant in all three prongs of Title IX. Not true, though at one time ETSU was because they dropped football. To my recollection, you only have to be compliant in one, but "working" to be compliant in all three. Mommabear could elaborate more on this, but I doubt she'll want to come back and elaborate more on it.

3. Strategic. Business. Decision. This is the one that simply will piss you off. Colleges are supposedly in the business of educating young minds, so strategically speaking they cut 53, and what should've been 63 potential scholarship opportunities to educate young minds. The claim was ETSU was LOSING 1 million dollars per year. It's a matter of terminology, the numbers simply don't add up. They weren't losing the million, it was COSTING one million per year to run football at ETSU. They were making fairly decent chunks of it back through revenue games, as you may remember Marshall doing at one time and probably to some degree still does. This is where the lies and the deceit come in that have caused such a disconnect. They, being Mullins and Stanton told donors that by DROPPING football ETSU would: Get into a premier basketball conference such as C-USA or one like it. C-USA came to campus, looked at our facilities and said to call when they're updated and ON CAMPUS. They also said ETSU would see an upgrade in all sports, upgrade is a relative term again. ETSU got into the A-Sun, and yes has won the All Sports trophy just about every year we've been there BUT, it's the Atlantic Sun. Most of the time here we've seen atleast one, if not multiple D-2 transition programs (UNF, KSU, FGCU, Upstate, NKU next year) along with programs who have largely been embarrassing in basketball (Stetson, Jacksonville, Mercer, Campbell-who left for the Big South). So while there have been some post season appearances in alot of sports, volleyball still hasn't gone to the NCAA's, women's soccer had it's first winning season in ages, you get the idea. ETSU is winning conference championships or competing for, but the thought of winning in NCAA Tournament play is a pipe dream. Less than 10 years ago it was EXPECTED that ETSU go in and be a Davidson, Murray State, VCU, Butler, etc... See the song Promises by Keith Whitley. It fits here. Oh, and they also said no additional student fees would be added to support athletics, yet they've added one and it keeps going up. ETSU's budget has gone from six million when they had football to 11 million without. Begs the question, what in the hell are they spending an additional five million dollars a year on...

4. Nobody supported it and we can't compete with UT. Funny thing to me is Appalachian competes yearly with UNC, NC State, UT, VPI, South Carolina, etc... You guys have to deal with Ohio State and WVU in Huntington, not to mention Pitt. It's a difference in attitude and mentality. It was easier to QUIT, makes excuses of why they couldn't do it instead of working to find a way TO DO IT.

5. Everybody else will dropping it. I like to bring this one up because Slappy likes to bring up the fact we shouldn't bring it back because everyone else has it or has added it. ETSU dropped it because everyone else would be according to one of the stories they've thrown out there, so since the trend is the exact OPPOSITE of what that incompetent horse's ass said, the same principle could apply.

Hope that helps.
Gold, you prove to me weekly that you're either getting crazier by the day or you're just a moron. Look at the cost of gas, one bid conferences are looking at strength in numbers, for the very reasons we've discussed on here about the instability of the A-Sun. In a world of basketball only additions, UNC-A is great. I don't know that they shouldn't look at Winthrop as well, they won't stay down forever.



(03-28-2012 12:13 AM)HerdZoned Wrote:  Can I ask a few questions here as an outsider:

1) Where is Appy and GA Southern going. Neither have a conf invite somewhere else...

2) Was there another reason for dropping football besides "We can't afford it". If so what was it..

Point #1. That dropping of state support thing just provided Stanton another talking point along with "dire financial situation", "not on the backs of students", "football was 'losing' $1 mil a year", etc. He was still spouting this crap on his exit interview 8 years later. If you tell a lie long enough they will believe .............

Point #2. Just another talking point to add to the above. He was really shoveling it wasn't he?

Point #3. Yep, that spin was the grand daddy. You point out that they had already cut 10 scholarships from football. This was their time, their opportunity to strike and cut the other 53 in their grand redistribution scheme.

Point#4. And they were thrilled that support was down. Hell would freeze over before they would even think of doing anything about it. I can see Dave now at a low attendance football game "smiling from ear to ear" inside.

Point #5. The most preposterous college athletic pronouncement of the times. Remember, Stanton said that he got this tidbit from an NCAA official.

With relation to beating the dead horse, how can Dr. Noland make realistic and accurate athletic decisions without a look at history?
03-28-2012 05:38 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.