Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
The return of UMASS
Author Message
Bookmark and Share
Rabid Squirrel Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 7,326
Joined: Feb 2014
Reputation: 40
I Root For: NIU Huskies
Location: St.charles, IL
Post: #101
RE: The return of UMASS
(03-09-2024 08:30 AM)BigChilla Wrote:  
(03-08-2024 11:52 PM)Rabid Squirrel Wrote:  
(03-08-2024 09:47 PM)NIU75 Wrote:  
(03-08-2024 08:40 PM)HawaiiToNIU Wrote:  
(03-08-2024 06:49 PM)Rabid Squirrel Wrote:  [Image: FB24-Pro-Day-Measurables-PDF-NIU-Athletics.jpg]

Remember when we used to give a crap about NIU’s Pro day? I barely noticed this years.

Not that it would have mattered, but if I was Jackson I would have skipped the bench press.

Outside of Ester. These numbers are atrocious. Everyone of all positions seemed to have failed in the 3 cone drill. I'm doubtful anyone goes on to the next level.
The numbers are terrible.
Check out the NFL combine numbers.
https://www.nfl.com/combine/tracker/live...-colleges/

It really is a direct reflection of hammock’s alternative recruiting of size over athleticism. We all know the previous regimes took smaller but better athletes and hoped they could over come.

Not sure. We have to see when actual skill kids have a pro day. I am willing to be brown will put up some numbers. Rudolph too.

What’s wild to me is the transfer backers numbers - how bad were the kids we had coming back? No we can see why Dolphin seemed like the fastest guy out there.

Hammock gets a pass on the RB's. He crushes that position(if he can keep them around) and Brown will have a great Pro day. Rudolph too. But Rudolph has been the exception not the rule. It's no surprise no wr's attended this pro day.
03-09-2024 05:56 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
calvin12 Offline
I am the overlord of everything
*

Posts: 3,546
Joined: Sep 2004
Reputation: 9
I Root For: duh
Location:
Post: #102
RE: The return of UMASS
(03-03-2024 05:05 PM)BigChilla Wrote:  
(03-03-2024 12:30 PM)holybovine Wrote:  
(03-03-2024 08:31 AM)BigChilla Wrote:  
(03-03-2024 02:25 AM)holybovine Wrote:  Just popped on here to say “F#ck Liberty”.

Thank you.

Why? Because you hate their politics? A lot of people hate a lot of universities politics. That shouldn’t be a factor.

I’m fairly apolitical…so maybe my perspective is different…and maybe I’m crazy…but I think both sides are idiots who are trying to decide which grandpa is going to run the country. ***** crazy.

I wouldn’t let that crazy in to college football…or anywhere really…other than politics.

How about because it’s a fake, online university that has no place in higher education?


Oh sure, you were talking higher education? Tell me what taking an anthropology class, not by choice, has to do with my economics degree and my career? Forcing **** electives on people that cost full $$$ is fine, and welcome, in education. Learning on the internet is where we draw our line?

Wtf year is this?

online is a bunch of crap and ripe for flagrant cheating, driving down the value of the degree in general because no one can trust it.
(This post was last modified: 03-14-2024 09:59 AM by calvin12.)
03-14-2024 09:53 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
WreakHammockOnU Offline
Water Engineer
*

Posts: 32
Joined: May 2019
Reputation: 0
I Root For: NIU
Location:
Post: #103
RE: The return of UMASS
Let me try and get this back on topic.

I think the MAC is a hard no on U Conn because they would want to add a team for all sports. This was one of the reasons why the 1st U Mass experiment failed. One was that their football team was bad, it hurt scheduling having 13 teams, but they did not bring anything else to the conference as football only since they wouldn't leave the A-10. U Mass came to realize that they would have to move on from the A-10 if they wanted to get their football program into a conference. This time, I think the U Mass experiment will work out.

U Conn will NEVER leave the Big East. So why add them, you balance football scheduling but throw off all other sports.

WKU should be the main target to even the number of schools, them possibly MTSU. If not, take a shot at Youngstown St to elevate their football program and join the MAC. If you want to create a pod system. Illinois State would be another potential down the road if they want to jump up to FBS football. Or Indiana State.
(This post was last modified: 03-14-2024 10:41 AM by WreakHammockOnU.)
03-14-2024 10:36 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
HuskieDave Online
All American
*

Posts: 3,857
Joined: Mar 2003
Reputation: 19
I Root For: The NIU Huskies
Location: Homer Glen, Illinois
Post: #104
RE: The return of UMASS
(03-14-2024 10:36 AM)WreakHammockOnU Wrote:  Let me try and get this back on topic.

I think the MAC is a hard no on U Conn because they would want to add a team for all sports. This was one of the reasons why the 1st U Mass experiment failed. One was that their football team was bad, it hurt scheduling having 13 teams, but they did not bring anything else to the conference as football only since they wouldn't leave the A-10. U Mass came to realize that they would have to move on from the A-10 if they wanted to get their football program into a conference. This time, I think the U Mass experiment will work out.
U Conn will NEVER leave the Big East. So why add them, you balance football scheduling but throw off all other sports.

WKU should be the main target to even the number of schools, them possibly MTSU. If not, take a shot at Youngstown St to elevate their football program and join the MAC. If you want to create a pod system. Illinois State would be another potential down the road if they want to jump up to FBS football. Or Indiana State.

Youngstown State?…..absolutely NO. The MAC already has six schools in the state of Ohio, 50% of the conference. That makes absolutely no sense from any aspect.
(This post was last modified: 03-14-2024 10:43 AM by HuskieDave.)
03-14-2024 10:43 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
WreakHammockOnU Offline
Water Engineer
*

Posts: 32
Joined: May 2019
Reputation: 0
I Root For: NIU
Location:
Post: #105
RE: The return of UMASS
(03-14-2024 10:43 AM)HuskieDave Wrote:  
(03-14-2024 10:36 AM)WreakHammockOnU Wrote:  Let me try and get this back on topic.

I think the MAC is a hard no on U Conn because they would want to add a team for all sports. This was one of the reasons why the 1st U Mass experiment failed. One was that their football team was bad, it hurt scheduling having 13 teams, but they did not bring anything else to the conference as football only since they wouldn't leave the A-10. U Mass came to realize that they would have to move on from the A-10 if they wanted to get their football program into a conference. This time, I think the U Mass experiment will work out.
U Conn will NEVER leave the Big East. So why add them, you balance football scheduling but throw off all other sports.

WKU should be the main target to even the number of schools, them possibly MTSU. If not, take a shot at Youngstown St to elevate their football program and join the MAC. If you want to create a pod system. Illinois State would be another potential down the road if they want to jump up to FBS football. Or Indiana State.

Youngstown State?…..absolutely NO. The MAC already has six schools in the state of Ohio, 50% of the conference. That makes absolutely no sense from any aspect.

An Akron, Kent St, Youngstown Pod doesn't make any sense? Can't get any better geography and limited travel than that.
(This post was last modified: 03-14-2024 01:25 PM by WreakHammockOnU.)
03-14-2024 01:23 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
HuskieDave Online
All American
*

Posts: 3,857
Joined: Mar 2003
Reputation: 19
I Root For: The NIU Huskies
Location: Homer Glen, Illinois
Post: #106
RE: The return of UMASS
(03-14-2024 01:23 PM)WreakHammockOnU Wrote:  
(03-14-2024 10:43 AM)HuskieDave Wrote:  
(03-14-2024 10:36 AM)WreakHammockOnU Wrote:  Let me try and get this back on topic.

I think the MAC is a hard no on U Conn because they would want to add a team for all sports. This was one of the reasons why the 1st U Mass experiment failed. One was that their football team was bad, it hurt scheduling having 13 teams, but they did not bring anything else to the conference as football only since they wouldn't leave the A-10. U Mass came to realize that they would have to move on from the A-10 if they wanted to get their football program into a conference. This time, I think the U Mass experiment will work out.
U Conn will NEVER leave the Big East. So why add them, you balance football scheduling but throw off all other sports.

WKU should be the main target to even the number of schools, them possibly MTSU. If not, take a shot at Youngstown St to elevate their football program and join the MAC. If you want to create a pod system. Illinois State would be another potential down the road if they want to jump up to FBS football. Or Indiana State.

Youngstown State?…..absolutely NO. The MAC already has six schools in the state of Ohio, 50% of the conference. That makes absolutely no sense from any aspect.

An Akron, Kent St, Youngstown Pod doesn't make any sense? Can't get any better geography and limited travel than that.

Please tell me what would be gained by adding a SEVENTH Ohio team to the conference. Just re-name it the Ohio Conference at that point.
03-14-2024 01:41 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
HawaiiToNIU Offline
All American
*

Posts: 3,947
Joined: Jul 2018
Reputation: 30
I Root For: NIU
Location:
Post: #107
RE: The return of UMASS
(03-14-2024 01:41 PM)HuskieDave Wrote:  
(03-14-2024 01:23 PM)WreakHammockOnU Wrote:  
(03-14-2024 10:43 AM)HuskieDave Wrote:  
(03-14-2024 10:36 AM)WreakHammockOnU Wrote:  Let me try and get this back on topic.

I think the MAC is a hard no on U Conn because they would want to add a team for all sports. This was one of the reasons why the 1st U Mass experiment failed. One was that their football team was bad, it hurt scheduling having 13 teams, but they did not bring anything else to the conference as football only since they wouldn't leave the A-10. U Mass came to realize that they would have to move on from the A-10 if they wanted to get their football program into a conference. This time, I think the U Mass experiment will work out.
U Conn will NEVER leave the Big East. So why add them, you balance football scheduling but throw off all other sports.

WKU should be the main target to even the number of schools, them possibly MTSU. If not, take a shot at Youngstown St to elevate their football program and join the MAC. If you want to create a pod system. Illinois State would be another potential down the road if they want to jump up to FBS football. Or Indiana State.

Youngstown State?…..absolutely NO. The MAC already has six schools in the state of Ohio, 50% of the conference. That makes absolutely no sense from any aspect.

An Akron, Kent St, Youngstown Pod doesn't make any sense? Can't get any better geography and limited travel than that.

Please tell me what would be gained by adding a SEVENTH Ohio team to the conference. Just re-name it the Ohio Conference at that point.

Look at you Choosing Beggars...
03-14-2024 01:44 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
HuskieJ Offline
No 1 Illness Hater
*

Posts: 3,602
Joined: Jun 2002
Reputation: 8
I Root For: NIU Only
Location:
Post: #108
RE: The return of UMASS
No more FCS teams will be moving up. The entry barriers including a lot more cash make it prohibitive not. Last group you will see is the latest SBC teams that made to in under the wire.
03-14-2024 03:04 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
uiniu57 Offline
All American
*

Posts: 3,010
Joined: Feb 2010
Reputation: 29
I Root For: Amanda Sauer
Location: Frozen part of hell
Post: #109
RE: The return of UMASS
(03-14-2024 01:41 PM)HuskieDave Wrote:  Please tell me what would be gained by adding a SEVENTH Ohio team to the conference. Just re-name it the Ohio Conference at that point.

You have to admit "The Moc" would have some political accuracy.
03-14-2024 04:15 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
HawaiiToNIU Offline
All American
*

Posts: 3,947
Joined: Jul 2018
Reputation: 30
I Root For: NIU
Location:
Post: #110
RE: The return of UMASS
(03-14-2024 04:15 PM)uiniu57 Wrote:  
(03-14-2024 01:41 PM)HuskieDave Wrote:  Please tell me what would be gained by adding a SEVENTH Ohio team to the conference. Just re-name it the Ohio Conference at that point.

You have to admit "The Moc" would have some political accuracy.

Lol.

The Mid Ohio Conference
The Mostly Ohio Conference
The Majority Ohio Conference
The Many Ohio Colleges
The More Ohio Conference
Too Much Ohio Conference
The Mega Ohio Conference
(This post was last modified: 03-14-2024 09:13 PM by HawaiiToNIU.)
03-14-2024 09:11 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
thxjoenovak Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 8,104
Joined: Jan 2010
Reputation: 36
I Root For: NIU
Location:
Post: #111
RE: The return of UMASS
(03-14-2024 09:11 PM)HawaiiToNIU Wrote:  
(03-14-2024 04:15 PM)uiniu57 Wrote:  
(03-14-2024 01:41 PM)HuskieDave Wrote:  Please tell me what would be gained by adding a SEVENTH Ohio team to the conference. Just re-name it the Ohio Conference at that point.

You have to admit "The Moc" would have some political accuracy.

Lol.

The Mid Ohio Conference
The Mostly Ohio Conference
The Majority Ohio Conference
The Many Ohio Colleges
The More Ohio Conference
Too Much Ohio Conference
The Mega Ohio Conference

03-lmfao
Those are good. Maybe…

The BIG “O”

05-duck
03-15-2024 07:16 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.