(11-29-2017 11:19 AM)pesik Wrote:  

(11-29-2017 10:58 AM)Wudizzle Wrote:  

(11-29-2017 10:45 AM)pesik Wrote:  

(11-29-2017 10:37 AM)Wudizzle Wrote:  

(11-29-2017 02:24 AM)CornellCoog Wrote:  Hey Einstein, the simple point is we are not even in December yet. Using the rpi right now is meaningless. Using the predictor is stupid.

Also, no, Drake is not a bad team. Bad teams are not 4-1 with a 5 point loss to Colorado as the only blemish. A bad team is the one the Shockers played tonight.

If Drake isn't a bad team, you guys are gonna need to lay off the cupcake conference smack-talk. You're really not helping your credibility here.

no you made a black and white argument out of one that has many shades of gray

wsu played sme decent teams last year, but when we are talking "good" in that argument we are talking to the level wsu homers hype themselves up to be

wichita fans are saying they'll beat decent teams in our league by atleast 30, your backups would win tons of games in the AAC, you are going to win the league and it wont be close...will also unprovoked start trashing another team for no reason

we respond saying you didnt play anyone good....what we mean is you didnt play anyone good enough to have this much cockiness

before wichita fans joined the forum, most of us celebrated wichita, and ALL wanted you to be good...
we all collectively root against yall (Despite it hurting ourr conference) because your fanbase is the worst..you were 30-4, 0 of those teams you beat in the regular season made the tourney..and you lost to some that didnt make it

Where did I make a black and white argument?

Where are all the WSU fans saying any of these things: "wichita fans are saying they'll beat decent teams in our league by atleast 30, your backups would win tons of games in the AAC, you are going to win the league and it wont be close"

This is factually incorrect: "you were 30-4, 0 of those teams you beat in the regular season made the tourney"


Seems like the two biggest problems is people making things up about WSU, and people being upset that WSU fans brought a couple trolls to join the many already present on this fine forum.

This is factually incorrect: "you were 30-4, 0 of those teams you beat in the regular season made the tourney"

not a single "regular" season win you had made the tournment, that is a fact

It's really difficult to take you seriously when you keep spouting incorrect facts even after being told to fact-check yourself. I'll give you another chance to verify that you are wrong. Looking forward to you immediately moving the goalpost when you realize your error.

What's everybody up to today?

(11-29-2017 11:28 AM)DownOnRohs Wrote:  What's everybody up to today?

Oh, you know, just

(11-29-2017 11:25 AM)Wudizzle Wrote:  

(11-29-2017 11:19 AM)pesik Wrote:  

(11-29-2017 10:58 AM)Wudizzle Wrote:  

(11-29-2017 10:45 AM)pesik Wrote:  

(11-29-2017 10:37 AM)Wudizzle Wrote:  If Drake isn't a bad team, you guys are gonna need to lay off the cupcake conference smack-talk. You're really not helping your credibility here.

no you made a black and white argument out of one that has many shades of gray

wsu played sme decent teams last year, but when we are talking "good" in that argument we are talking to the level wsu homers hype themselves up to be

wichita fans are saying they'll beat decent teams in our league by atleast 30, your backups would win tons of games in the AAC, you are going to win the league and it wont be close...will also unprovoked start trashing another team for no reason

we respond saying you didnt play anyone good....what we mean is you didnt play anyone good enough to have this much cockiness

before wichita fans joined the forum, most of us celebrated wichita, and ALL wanted you to be good...
we all collectively root against yall (Despite it hurting ourr conference) because your fanbase is the worst..you were 30-4, 0 of those teams you beat in the regular season made the tourney..and you lost to some that didnt make it

Where did I make a black and white argument?

Where are all the WSU fans saying any of these things: "wichita fans are saying they'll beat decent teams in our league by atleast 30, your backups would win tons of games in the AAC, you are going to win the league and it wont be close"

This is factually incorrect: "you were 30-4, 0 of those teams you beat in the regular season made the tourney"


Seems like the two biggest problems is people making things up about WSU, and people being upset that WSU fans brought a couple trolls to join the many already present on this fine forum.

This is factually incorrect: "you were 30-4, 0 of those teams you beat in the regular season made the tourney"

not a single "regular" season win you had made the tournment, that is a fact

It's really difficult to take you seriously when you keep spouting incorrect facts even after being told to fact-check yourself. I'll give you another chance to verify that you are wrong. Looking forward to you immediately moving the goalpost when you realize your error.

stop dancing around and wasting peoples time.. if i had to guess one of the teams you beat got an auto-bid despite not being ncaa calibur, which was actually my point.. "you didnt bet anyone good enough to be this cocky"..

(11-29-2017 11:31 AM)pesik Wrote:  

(11-29-2017 11:25 AM)Wudizzle Wrote:  

(11-29-2017 11:19 AM)pesik Wrote:  

(11-29-2017 10:58 AM)Wudizzle Wrote:  

(11-29-2017 10:45 AM)pesik Wrote:  no you made a black and white argument out of one that has many shades of gray

wsu played sme decent teams last year, but when we are talking "good" in that argument we are talking to the level wsu homers hype themselves up to be

wichita fans are saying they'll beat decent teams in our league by atleast 30, your backups would win tons of games in the AAC, you are going to win the league and it wont be close...will also unprovoked start trashing another team for no reason

we respond saying you didnt play anyone good....what we mean is you didnt play anyone good enough to have this much cockiness

before wichita fans joined the forum, most of us celebrated wichita, and ALL wanted you to be good...
we all collectively root against yall (Despite it hurting ourr conference) because your fanbase is the worst..you were 30-4, 0 of those teams you beat in the regular season made the tourney..and you lost to some that didnt make it

Where did I make a black and white argument?

Where are all the WSU fans saying any of these things: "wichita fans are saying they'll beat decent teams in our league by atleast 30, your backups would win tons of games in the AAC, you are going to win the league and it wont be close"

This is factually incorrect: "you were 30-4, 0 of those teams you beat in the regular season made the tourney"


Seems like the two biggest problems is people making things up about WSU, and people being upset that WSU fans brought a couple trolls to join the many already present on this fine forum.

This is factually incorrect: "you were 30-4, 0 of those teams you beat in the regular season made the tourney"

not a single "regular" season win you had made the tournment, that is a fact

It's really difficult to take you seriously when you keep spouting incorrect facts even after being told to fact-check yourself. I'll give you another chance to verify that you are wrong. Looking forward to you immediately moving the goalpost when you realize your error.

stop dancing around and wasting peoples time.. if i had to guess one of the teams you beat go an auto-bid despite not being ncaa calibur, which was actually my point

Thanks for following through on moving the goalpost.

(11-29-2017 11:28 AM)DownOnRohs Wrote:  What's everybody up to today?

(11-29-2017 11:31 AM)Wudizzle Wrote:  Thanks for following through on moving the goalpost.

thats not moving the goal post

the goal post was always "you didnt beat anyone who was good enough for you to be this cocky"

i used that line that you didnt beat anyone that was in the tourney as a point to prove that

stating a technicality, neither changes the goalpost or the point of my statement....i should have stated you didnt beat any "ncaa calibur" teams..all things still remain the same

changing the goal post: if Colorado state was actually a 27 team and made the tourney and i dint know that, "well you only beat one team that was good, can you handle it week in and out" that is moving the goal post and redefining my argument

(11-29-2017 11:31 AM)pesik Wrote:  

(11-29-2017 11:25 AM)Wudizzle Wrote:  

(11-29-2017 11:19 AM)pesik Wrote:  

(11-29-2017 10:58 AM)Wudizzle Wrote:  

(11-29-2017 10:45 AM)pesik Wrote:  no you made a black and white argument out of one that has many shades of gray

wsu played sme decent teams last year, but when we are talking "good" in that argument we are talking to the level wsu homers hype themselves up to be

wichita fans are saying they'll beat decent teams in our league by atleast 30, your backups would win tons of games in the AAC, you are going to win the league and it wont be close...will also unprovoked start trashing another team for no reason

we respond saying you didnt play anyone good....what we mean is you didnt play anyone good enough to have this much cockiness

before wichita fans joined the forum, most of us celebrated wichita, and ALL wanted you to be good...
we all collectively root against yall (Despite it hurting ourr conference) because your fanbase is the worst..you were 30-4, 0 of those teams you beat in the regular season made the tourney..and you lost to some that didnt make it

Where did I make a black and white argument?

Where are all the WSU fans saying any of these things: "wichita fans are saying they'll beat decent teams in our league by atleast 30, your backups would win tons of games in the AAC, you are going to win the league and it wont be close"

This is factually incorrect: "you were 30-4, 0 of those teams you beat in the regular season made the tourney"


Seems like the two biggest problems is people making things up about WSU, and people being upset that WSU fans brought a couple trolls to join the many already present on this fine forum.

This is factually incorrect: "you were 30-4, 0 of those teams you beat in the regular season made the tourney"

not a single "regular" season win you had made the tournment, that is a fact

It's really difficult to take you seriously when you keep spouting incorrect facts even after being told to fact-check yourself. I'll give you another chance to verify that you are wrong. Looking forward to you immediately moving the goalpost when you realize your error.

stop dancing around and wasting peoples time.. if i had to guess one of the teams you beat got an auto-bid despite not being ncaa calibur, which was actually my point.. "you didnt bet anyone good enough to be this cocky"..

Do Top 10 ranked teams normally not have any cocky fans?

Either way, your points suck.

(11-29-2017 11:35 AM)pesik Wrote:  

(11-29-2017 11:31 AM)Wudizzle Wrote:  Thanks for following through on moving the goalpost.

thats not moving the goal post

It's literally the definition of moving the goal post. You set up an arbitrary delineation to prove a point.

You were proven wrong.

You moved your arbitrary delineation.

(11-29-2017 11:36 AM)Wudizzle Wrote:  

(11-29-2017 11:35 AM)pesik Wrote:  

(11-29-2017 11:31 AM)Wudizzle Wrote:  Thanks for following through on moving the goalpost.

thats not moving the goal post

It's literally the definition of moving the goal post. You set up an arbitrary delineation to prove a point.

You were proven wrong.

You moved your arbitrary delineation.

changing the goal post: if Colorado state was actually a 27 team and made the tourney and i didnt know that, "well you only beat one team that was good, can you handle it week in and week out in agood league" that is moving the goal post and redefining my argument

that was my main argument point, you rebutted with a technicality in evidence but that didnt change what the goal post was, which was who did you beat to get such cockiness...

it is moving the goal post is if we were having a debate who has more regular season tourney wins

Why are we talking about goalposts in a basketball thread? Y'all need to learn what terms go with which sports.

Was trying to speak in terms pesik would understand.

It didn't work.

I'm not surprised.

(11-29-2017 11:46 AM)Wudizzle Wrote:  Was trying to speak in terms pesik would understand.

It didn't work.

I'm not surprised.

im not surprised you dont get what moving the goal post is either...
-if i say boxer is 30-0 and doesnt deserve the hype becuase he hasnt beaten anyone good.
and then say they didnt even beat anyone with a title...noting one of his opponent, who isnt good, got a title on forfeit for the opponent testing positive for PED... doesnt change the original goal post

almost everyone here celebrates when wichita losses out of conference games (which is bad for our league)..but you for some reason dont think wichita fans have been trashing everyone here..

but whatever floats your boat

Not only do your long-winded takes suck, but your grammar sucks too. You have to at least do one of those two things right to attain any sort of credibility at all.

(11-29-2017 11:55 AM)ShockerFever Wrote:  Not only do your long-winded takes suck, but your grammar sucks too. You have to at least do one of those two things right to attain any sort of credibility at all.

wierdly enough. most people here find me more credible than you..

(11-29-2017 12:00 PM)pesik Wrote:  

(11-29-2017 11:55 AM)ShockerFever Wrote:  Not only do your long-winded takes suck, but your grammar sucks too. You have to at least do one of those two things right to attain any sort of credibility at all.

wierdly enough. most people here find me more credible than you..

The people in your head don’t count.

blah blah SOS blah blah OOC blah blah Kenpom blah blah

(11-29-2017 12:15 PM)Bearcats#1 Wrote:  blah blah SOS blah blah OOC blah blah Kenpom blah blah

So blah blah NCAA Tournament selection?

"We good, you no good"

#TheWuDizzScale #ShockerFeverSystem

(11-29-2017 12:43 PM)bearcatfan1211 Wrote:  "We good, you no good"

#TheWuDizzScale #ShockerFeverSystem

Find one time I've ever referenced UC as anything other than a Top10 - Top15 team on this or any other forum.

The word-twisting and hyperbole is next-level. And not from WSU fans.