(11-16-2017 03:50 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(11-16-2017 03:48 PM)solohawks Wrote:  

(11-16-2017 03:38 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  Just to make sure we are all on the same page here.


Moore is being accused of pedophilia.

again, pick up a Webster's dictionary

The man is being accused of sexually assaulting teenagers. Pedophilia is an attraction to children.

What is the republican alternate definition of this?

Quote:Pedophilia is defined as the fantasy or act of sexual activity with children who are generally age 13 years or younger.

Pedophilia - Psychology Today

(11-16-2017 03:45 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  Accusations without proof carry no weight in the court of law, only public opinion.

Right...and no one here, nor the accusers themselves are talking about any legal action as of now.

(11-16-2017 04:04 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-16-2017 03:50 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(11-16-2017 03:48 PM)solohawks Wrote:  

(11-16-2017 03:38 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  Just to make sure we are all on the same page here.


Moore is being accused of pedophilia.

again, pick up a Webster's dictionary

The man is being accused of sexually assaulting teenagers. Pedophilia is an attraction to children.

What is the republican alternate definition of this?

Quote:Pedophilia is defined as the fantasy or act of sexual activity with children who are generally age 13 years or younger.

Pedophilia - Psychology Today

Does anyone think that Roy isn't a creep?

I stand corrected. Since Moore was into 14 year olds and not 13 year olds. I guess he's okay.


Jesus.

(11-16-2017 04:05 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-16-2017 03:45 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  Accusations without proof carry no weight in the court of law, only public opinion.

Right...and no one here, nor the accusers themselves are talking about any legal action as of now.

So you agree that Moore shouldn't have to step down just because people are accusing him of actions with very little to no credible evidence. You should also agree that the onus of proof lies entirely on the accusers and they should present any and all evidence immediately and failure to do so clearly undermines their accusations.

(11-16-2017 04:19 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(11-16-2017 04:05 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-16-2017 03:45 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  Accusations without proof carry no weight in the court of law, only public opinion.

Right...and no one here, nor the accusers themselves are talking about any legal action as of now.

So you agree that Moore shouldn't have to step down just because people are accusing him of actions with very little to no credible evidence. You should also agree that the onus of proof lies entirely on the accusers and they should present any and all evidence immediately and failure to do so clearly undermines their accusations.

http://www.csnbbs.com/thread-832934-post...id14789392

There are now TEN separate women making accusations. Some are Republicans. I'm not aware of any Democrat that's an accusers. Most don't know each other either. At some point the mere volume of the accusations reinforces the credibility of the accusations.

(11-16-2017 04:50 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(11-16-2017 04:19 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(11-16-2017 04:05 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-16-2017 03:45 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  Accusations without proof carry no weight in the court of law, only public opinion.

Right...and no one here, nor the accusers themselves are talking about any legal action as of now.

So you agree that Moore shouldn't have to step down just because people are accusing him of actions with very little to no credible evidence. You should also agree that the onus of proof lies entirely on the accusers and they should present any and all evidence immediately and failure to do so clearly undermines their accusations.

http://www.csnbbs.com/thread-832934-post...id14789392

There are now TEN separate women making accusations. Some are Republicans. I'm not aware of any Democrat that's an accusers. Most don't know each other either. At some point the mere volume of the accusations reinforces the credibility of the accusations.

I am so glad you think the number of accusations should matter instead of evidence... I am also so glad you are not a judge nor an attorney.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

(11-16-2017 04:50 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(11-16-2017 04:19 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(11-16-2017 04:05 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-16-2017 03:45 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  Accusations without proof carry no weight in the court of law, only public opinion.

Right...and no one here, nor the accusers themselves are talking about any legal action as of now.

So you agree that Moore shouldn't have to step down just because people are accusing him of actions with very little to no credible evidence. You should also agree that the onus of proof lies entirely on the accusers and they should present any and all evidence immediately and failure to do so clearly undermines their accusations.

http://www.csnbbs.com/thread-832934-post...id14789392

There are now TEN separate women making accusations. Some are Republicans. I'm not aware of any Democrat that's an accusers. Most don't know each other either. At some point the mere volume of the accusations reinforces the credibility of the accusations.

I think some of the accusations are probably credible. The guy is a hardcore traditionalist from rural Alabama and was 30 and unmarried. I think he probably, in an old fashioned manner, courted teenage girls and their parents. Probably not very unusual or far-fetched for the time and place where most women were married before 21. Not illegal either and the extent of most of the allegations.

I think Dan Rather signed the yearbook at the same time he wrote Bush's National Guard papers and Hitler's Diary.

(Seriously, I think Moore is a weirdo. But I couldn't pass on the above for all of those who think a fake document never happens).

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G870A using Tapatalk

Having sex with a boy or girl under 13 is the same sentence you get for the ages of 14 to 18. Moore is a pedophile, and he would still be charged the same either way. It is illegal no matter what and under the legal sense, anybody under 18 that someone accused of sexually assaulted is a pedophile.

Fox News' latest poll has Jones up by 8 percentage points over Moore now.

(11-16-2017 03:35 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(11-16-2017 03:05 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(11-16-2017 02:01 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(11-16-2017 01:50 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  Such anger. Y'all take this shite way too seriously.

As for the topic, I am still waiting for the apology from McConnell, Ryan, McCain, Allred, and the DNC for this disgusting smear tactic.

For what? Four more women came forward in the last 2 days.

came forward with what? Don't tell me, let me guess. Accusations without any sort of evidence. Of course that is enough for the left to convict a republican.

Nine accusers now. LOL.

Accusations of what?

Being an older guy chasing skirts? And? This is the first guy doing that?

(11-16-2017 03:50 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(11-16-2017 03:48 PM)solohawks Wrote:  

(11-16-2017 03:38 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  Just to make sure we are all on the same page here.


Moore is being accused of pedophilia.

again, pick up a Webster's dictionary

The man is being accused of sexually assaulting teenagers. Pedophilia is an attraction to children.

What is the republican alternate definition of this?

Oh my...


Bless your heart.

(11-16-2017 04:05 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(11-16-2017 04:04 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-16-2017 03:50 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(11-16-2017 03:48 PM)solohawks Wrote:  

(11-16-2017 03:38 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  Just to make sure we are all on the same page here.


Moore is being accused of pedophilia.

again, pick up a Webster's dictionary

The man is being accused of sexually assaulting teenagers. Pedophilia is an attraction to children.

What is the republican alternate definition of this?

Quote:Pedophilia is defined as the fantasy or act of sexual activity with children who are generally age 13 years or younger.

Pedophilia - Psychology Today

Does anyone think that Roy isn't a creep?

Is that illegal? Disqualifying now?

I may find you creepy at times, what penalty should you face cause of that?

NO!

First it sets a bad precedent accusers can come out of the woodwork to take out any candidate "activists" may dislike. Second the Gloria Allred coached accuser has a story inconsistent with all accusers, since she is the only one that said there was attempted rape. Finally the 40 year old accusations are disturbing but appear to be a phase the most recent incidents involve women out of their teens. Was he a pedophile? So far no accuser that was a teen at the time said he had sex with them. He's a creep if any of the accusations are true, but now accusations against lots of well known people are coming out. When will someone be falsely accused? Should accusations beyond the statute of limitations be legal? I don't like Moore, but this is shaping up to be a political hit job to help dems get control of the senate.

(11-16-2017 06:59 PM)THE NC Herd Fan Wrote:  NO!

First it sets a bad precedent accusers can come out of the woodwork to take out any candidate "activists" may dislike. Second the Gloria Allred coached accuser has a story inconsistent with all accusers, since she is the only one that said there was attempted rape. Finally the 40 year old accusations are disturbing but appear to be a phase the most recent incidents involve women out of their teens. Was he a pedophile? So far no accuser that was a teen at the time said he had sex with them. He's a creep if any of the accusations are true, but now accusations against lots of well known people are coming out. When will someone be falsely accused? Should accusations beyond the statute of limitations be legal? I don't like Moore, but this is shaping up to be a political hit job to help dems get control of the senate.

Exactly what it is. It will backfire. Ask Al Fraken if you dont believe me. Just the beginning.

(11-16-2017 04:50 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote:  

(11-16-2017 04:19 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(11-16-2017 04:05 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-16-2017 03:45 PM)200yrs2late Wrote:  Accusations without proof carry no weight in the court of law, only public opinion.

Right...and no one here, nor the accusers themselves are talking about any legal action as of now.

So you agree that Moore shouldn't have to step down just because people are accusing him of actions with very little to no credible evidence. You should also agree that the onus of proof lies entirely on the accusers and they should present any and all evidence immediately and failure to do so clearly undermines their accusations.

http://www.csnbbs.com/thread-832934-post...id14789392

There are now TEN separate women making accusations. Some are Republicans. I'm not aware of any Democrat that's an accusers. Most don't know each other either. At some point the mere volume of the accusations reinforces the credibility of the accusations.

What you are aware of doesn't matter, nor does the number of accusations. Your responses to this are sounding even more stupid than usual.

Sent from my SM-G900R4 using CSNbbs mobile app

(11-16-2017 07:15 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(11-16-2017 06:59 PM)THE NC Herd Fan Wrote:  NO!

First it sets a bad precedent accusers can come out of the woodwork to take out any candidate "activists" may dislike. Second the Gloria Allred coached accuser has a story inconsistent with all accusers, since she is the only one that said there was attempted rape. Finally the 40 year old accusations are disturbing but appear to be a phase the most recent incidents involve women out of their teens. Was he a pedophile? So far no accuser that was a teen at the time said he had sex with them. He's a creep if any of the accusations are true, but now accusations against lots of well known people are coming out. When will someone be falsely accused? Should accusations beyond the statute of limitations be legal? I don't like Moore, but this is shaping up to be a political hit job to help dems get control of the senate.

Exactly what it is. It will backfire. Ask Al Fraken if you dont believe me. Just the beginning.

you left out, "the worst executed hatchet job attempt evah"

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/...erved/amp/

Roy Moore appears to be demanding he release of the yearbook, the only piece of actual evidence presented thus far, within 48 hours. Trying to prevent potential spoilation of evidence by the accuser and her attorney

BUT MUH BETTING ODDS

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk