(10-11-2017 08:46 PM)Arrowhead Wrote:  I hear they wouldn’t turn it down again if there only bowl choice.

To be honest and not trolling I don't think ULM will get to 6 wins this year. Got a tough road to hoe by looking at the remaining schedule. If they do then Coach Viator deserves Sunbelt COY honors. Regardless your team is progressing each year with him as Coach. Next year should be bowl or bust.

The NOBowl would prefer ULM or ULL (and sometimes LaTech) to be in the game since that would guarantee a good crowd. ULM sent 24,000+ to Shreveport in 2012 for a bowl game in freezing temps. I wouldn't mind doing a game indoors next time! But we gotta win at least three more games or nothing happens.

(10-11-2017 09:08 PM)SOT1977 Wrote:  The NOBowl would prefer ULM or ULL (and sometimes LaTech) to be in the game since that would guarantee a good crowd. ULM sent 24,000+ to Shreveport in 2012 for a bowl game in freezing temps. I wouldn't mind doing a game indoors next time! But we gotta win at least three more games or nothing happens.

Did you really send 24,000 to the Indy bowl? The crowd looked terrible from the pictures I saw. Tech played N. Illinois in the Indy Bowl a few years back and had at least twice if not three times as many people at the game in freezing temps than ULM did. I don't think NOBowl would prefer ULM since you've only been in one bowl game the entire existence of playing I-A/FBS football. You're right about one thing gotta win three more games.

(10-11-2017 09:20 PM)deb025 Wrote:  

(10-11-2017 09:08 PM)SOT1977 Wrote:  The NOBowl would prefer ULM or ULL (and sometimes LaTech) to be in the game since that would guarantee a good crowd. ULM sent 24,000+ to Shreveport in 2012 for a bowl game in freezing temps. I wouldn't mind doing a game indoors next time! But we gotta win at least three more games or nothing happens.

Did you really send 24,000 to the Indy bowl? The crowd looked terrible from the pictures I saw. Tech played N. Illinois in the Indy Bowl a few years back and had at least twice if not three times as many people at the game in freezing temps than ULM did. I don't think NOBowl would prefer ULM since you've only been in one bowl game the entire existence of playing I-A/FBS football. You're right about one thing gotta win three more games.

Yes there was 24k from ULM there we were side that had all the fans. Come on man don’t play dumb.

(10-11-2017 09:32 PM)Golota Wrote:  

(10-11-2017 09:20 PM)deb025 Wrote:  

(10-11-2017 09:08 PM)SOT1977 Wrote:  The NOBowl would prefer ULM or ULL (and sometimes LaTech) to be in the game since that would guarantee a good crowd. ULM sent 24,000+ to Shreveport in 2012 for a bowl game in freezing temps. I wouldn't mind doing a game indoors next time! But we gotta win at least three more games or nothing happens.

Did you really send 24,000 to the Indy bowl? The crowd looked terrible from the pictures I saw. Tech played N. Illinois in the Indy Bowl a few years back and had at least twice if not three times as many people at the game in freezing temps than ULM did. I don't think NOBowl would prefer ULM since you've only been in one bowl game the entire existence of playing I-A/FBS football. You're right about one thing gotta win three more games.

Yes there was 24k from ULM there we were side that had all the fans. Come on man don’t play dumb.

If it was 24k it was close. Now ULM needs to get 24k at home. Should have a good crowd this weekend. On a three game winning streak and at home.

(10-11-2017 09:36 PM)deb025 Wrote:  

(10-11-2017 09:32 PM)Golota Wrote:  

(10-11-2017 09:20 PM)deb025 Wrote:  

(10-11-2017 09:08 PM)SOT1977 Wrote:  The NOBowl would prefer ULM or ULL (and sometimes LaTech) to be in the game since that would guarantee a good crowd. ULM sent 24,000+ to Shreveport in 2012 for a bowl game in freezing temps. I wouldn't mind doing a game indoors next time! But we gotta win at least three more games or nothing happens.

Did you really send 24,000 to the Indy bowl? The crowd looked terrible from the pictures I saw. Tech played N. Illinois in the Indy Bowl a few years back and had at least twice if not three times as many people at the game in freezing temps than ULM did. I don't think NOBowl would prefer ULM since you've only been in one bowl game the entire existence of playing I-A/FBS football. You're right about one thing gotta win three more games.

Yes there was 24k from ULM there we were side that had all the fans. Come on man don’t play dumb.

If it was 24k it was close. Now ULM needs to get 24k at home. Should have a good crowd this weekend. On a three game winning streak and at home.

Cheers for team that cant sell out against SEC squad.

*talks attendance smack.

BTW its gonna be a tough ride for us to get 6 (or 5 if we get a waiver), but its not guaranteed for Tech either. Y'all just lost to UAB

(10-11-2017 10:42 PM)Warhawkman Wrote:  

(10-11-2017 09:36 PM)deb025 Wrote:  

(10-11-2017 09:32 PM)Golota Wrote:  

(10-11-2017 09:20 PM)deb025 Wrote:  

(10-11-2017 09:08 PM)SOT1977 Wrote:  The NOBowl would prefer ULM or ULL (and sometimes LaTech) to be in the game since that would guarantee a good crowd. ULM sent 24,000+ to Shreveport in 2012 for a bowl game in freezing temps. I wouldn't mind doing a game indoors next time! But we gotta win at least three more games or nothing happens.

Did you really send 24,000 to the Indy bowl? The crowd looked terrible from the pictures I saw. Tech played N. Illinois in the Indy Bowl a few years back and had at least twice if not three times as many people at the game in freezing temps than ULM did. I don't think NOBowl would prefer ULM since you've only been in one bowl game the entire existence of playing I-A/FBS football. You're right about one thing gotta win three more games.

Yes there was 24k from ULM there we were side that had all the fans. Come on man don’t play dumb.

If it was 24k it was close. Now ULM needs to get 24k at home. Should have a good crowd this weekend. On a three game winning streak and at home.

Cheers for team that cant sell out against SEC squad.

*talks attendance smack.

BTW its gonna be a tough ride for us to get 6 (or 5 if we get a waiver), but its not guaranteed for Tech either. Y'all just lost to UAB

Start up UAB....Lol. But tech is a tough team.

(10-11-2017 09:36 PM)deb025 Wrote:  

(10-11-2017 09:32 PM)Golota Wrote:  

(10-11-2017 09:20 PM)deb025 Wrote:  

(10-11-2017 09:08 PM)SOT1977 Wrote:  The NOBowl would prefer ULM or ULL (and sometimes LaTech) to be in the game since that would guarantee a good crowd. ULM sent 24,000+ to Shreveport in 2012 for a bowl game in freezing temps. I wouldn't mind doing a game indoors next time! But we gotta win at least three more games or nothing happens.

Did you really send 24,000 to the Indy bowl? The crowd looked terrible from the pictures I saw. Tech played N. Illinois in the Indy Bowl a few years back and had at least twice if not three times as many people at the game in freezing temps than ULM did. I don't think NOBowl would prefer ULM since you've only been in one bowl game the entire existence of playing I-A/FBS football. You're right about one thing gotta win three more games.

Yes there was 24k from ULM there we were side that had all the fans. Come on man don’t play dumb.

If it was 24k it was close. Now ULM needs to get 24k at home. Should have a good crowd this weekend. On a three game winning streak and at home.

Idk what the crowds going to look like. It hasn’t been good so far. Going to take more that 3 wins. V’s got the players bought in and dialed in.