The unofficial online home for fans of the Western Michigan University Broncos. Part of Collegiate Sports Nation (CSN).

Starting with gobaseline...

Who's voting for Trump? Not me.

(10-07-2016 11:36 PM)Charm City Bronco Wrote:  Starting with gobaseline...

Who's voting for Trump? Not me.

I haven't decided who I will vote for President yet.

So what draws you to whom your voting for? You seem like a well thought out rational individual.

(10-07-2016 11:41 PM)gobaseline Wrote:  I haven't decided who I will vote for President yet.

Sure you haven't. You've only turned the main page here into your own personal echo chamber for why you hate liberals and Democrats.

I haven't decided who to vote for, either. Tell you what, can I grab your pu55y and then make up my mind afterward?

He's a sheila?

(10-08-2016 12:23 AM)Charm City Bronco Wrote:  

(10-07-2016 11:41 PM)gobaseline Wrote:  I haven't decided who I will vote for President yet.

Sure you haven't. You've only turned the main page here into your own personal echo chamber for why you hate liberals and Democrats.

Head lines and stories right out of the news Charm. Washington Post, NY Times, NPR, PBS and Charlie Rose.

Instead of whining add some value with an intelligent insight instead of your normal dribble.

Both candidates are beyond horrible. I have never been shy about expressing by horror with how left this country has become in terms of government based socialism, and how willing the average Republican has been to accept that the federal government, and the President, is supposed to fix all the misfortunes in the world, and to "create jobs". Now everyone expects this abandonment of free enterprise, limited government, and individual liberties, giving way to big government. Most Americans wouldn't even know what I am referring to. The big parties cater to this thinking, and we now have become a blend of two brands of socialism; heavy, and less heavy.

At the same time Republicans have lost their mind with "social issues", and believe denying even hard working Americans rights because of religion, race or sexual preference is consistent with "conservative values", when in fact it is exactly opposite of the preservation of individual rights and liberties our founders based independence and our Constitution upon.

The Democrats are so far left that they would gleefully vote for the Constitution to be struck entirely and burned, in favor of the Communist manifesto.

Both candidates are pigs in every sense of the word. American voters are not "smart" as politicians love to say. They are dumb, blind, and naïve, and can be led by false promises of big government utopia.

I can't have it on my conscience that I voted for either of those two. We are doomed though not by Hillary or Donald, but by our collective stupidity in killing the goose that laid the golden eggs. Big government is doing us in. Both candidates love big government.

Trump supporter checking in.

With the latest revelations, WJC has to be thinking Trump has BFF potential....

(10-08-2016 08:37 AM)ESSSS Wrote:  With the latest revelations, WJC has to be thinking Trump has BFF potential....

They've both known that for decades.

For Hill's supporters they should be grappling with her allowing such where everyone else knows about it. Leading the invasion on the war on woman.

For DT, in spite of his comments of respect for woman don't confuse it with respect as the word is intentionally defined.

To Moomba's point, these two are PERFECTION for one another. Dumb and Dumber. Two peas in a pod. But they were/are only candidates.

The is on us for allowing these two clowns breathing air. Neither should have gotten close enough to the WH except for tour like the rest of us. Too busy with fantasy football, Hustlebelt Crutin and alt ID's. What the heck is Aleppo? Why are you asking?

We get what we deserve. "Going down. Next floor, Brazil."

I hear the "beeches" are beautiful down there. Sugar like sand and the water is like a bath.

He's a complete, 100% clown. Wouldn't vote for him if he was the last man standing. What a fraud. Give me a competent liar over an incompetent liar with SERIOUS mental issues any day.

(10-08-2016 09:52 AM)Broncos83 Wrote:  He's a complete, 100% clown. Wouldn't vote for him if he was the last man standing. What a fraud. Give me a competent liar over an incompetent liar with SERIOUS mental issues any day.

With Hillary's failures including losing her campaign to O'Bama, I wouldn't
exactly call her competent. As your taxes rise and are wasted to fix things like O'Bama Care, enjoy!!!

Ronald Reagan was called the Antichrist, Ronald Rayguns, whose incompetence was going to vault the World into Nuclear War-didn't happen. This card has been played before.

These two gangs have been feeding us $hit for years and this is just the culmination. Amazing that the people are once again buying in, reluctant or not.

Hey, I'm a Republican but we've made our own bed putting forth this complete idiot. Putting him in the POTUS role is a complete joke..."grab her by the p@&$@!". Are you serious?

That's just one of many. David Letterman was spot on, guys a loon.

America would be better if Both Trump AND Clinton would resign as their parties candidate.

"Next man in" isn't much better on either side. Maybe less slimy.

No

I'm going Clinton. I like the establishment. I like Wall Street and big banks. I like that she stood by her man. Obama was not strong enough to back her foreign policy, we'll be much stronger when she is running the show without him.

The other choice, well, it's all been said about that clown. All the best people suspect he is basically setting up a media audience to exploit with Ailes in their declining years. The guy is not top level political material.

What's Alleppo and Jill Stine are not real alternatives.

I am voting for Trump. I find him to be well informed, reflective, circumspect, given to mature thoughtful reflective behavior and unusually wise. His veracity, grasp of the facts and studiousness is legendary. His understanding of the nuances of foreign-policy is astonishing. He knows more than the generals do about ISIS, Believe me! While he has not been in formal government per se, his lifetime record of community service is well-known, exemplary and selfless. His repeated use of the bankruptcy code indicates an agility of sneakiness which is unparalleled in his display of business acumen.

His choice of running mate in Mike Pence exemplifies his ability to find individuals for his team who are objective, balanced and respectful of the rights of people different than himself.

Actually, here's how I feel

Quote:With Hillary's failures including losing her campaign to O'Bama, I wouldn't exactly call her competent.

So if someone lost in an election before, they're incompetent? Many presidents have lost elections before. Obama was an ideal candidate at the time for change post-GW who had bad #s.

One needs to be undefeated in all elections to be considered a competent person?