(02-21-2013 12:52 PM)LouPower Wrote: I know you don't like Saint Louis, you've established that over and over. But to suggest that this is all SLU can do is absurd.
You could argue that he wasn't attacking just Saint Louis with that. You have to ask the same question about most of the schools not named Butler or Xavier. Is VCU past their peak after the Final Four? Is Creighton going to decline without Doug McDermott? &c.
Ideally, you look a variety of factors and weigh them properly. Things the C7 have to consider are:
1. Funding and Institutional Support
2. Coaching (especially the age of the coach)
3. Fan support (where they rank in the local hierarchy)
4. Recent Success
5. Historical tournament success
6. Historical "respect" (polls like this in the regular season are good for measuring program respect, but that doesn't mean they are great for measuring program quality or success)
The ideal candidate for the C7 has institutional support, a proven young coach with commitment to the program, the ability to fill their arena even during off years, Sweet 16s or farther within the last 5 to 10 years, a large amount of past success in different decades, and respect from the media and other coaches. How does Saint Louis fare on those metrics, compared to other candidates? That isn't an unfair question, because it is
essential to ask that question about every candidate.