Paul.... this is so tiresome really.

The act of going. I was going to give someone something.

Here's a definition
the act of departing
departure, going away, leaving


by defintion. I was going to give SOAF some neg ratings. As in I was going to leave him ratings. I thought better of it. I deleted said ratings. This whole act. You're a buffoon. I left SOAF neg ratings and took them back. "I was going to give him neg ratings", then I "I thought WHY????" This whole exercise in semantics.............. REALLY?????? This is like the fish sandwich debate with Fo. Does it really FCKIN MATTER if it was a Walleye sandwich or Perch. Seriously DUDE. Your fckin retarded. STOP.

Quote:The fact that you willfully ignore facts and continue your lies shows the type of person you are.

Prove it. Show the threads were I said what you claim I said. You've been sprouting this tripe for too long. I can't remember exactly what it was, but you claim this happened. Prove it. I am aware of two things in that particular thread. I remember I commented specifically you like to change arguments in mid stream. You extrapoliated that defense with the time stamp. I let it go. Thinking at the time I'll just make sure to copy everything you say so you don't have the same chance. PUT UP OR SHUT UP TIME.

Seriously PAUL

Don't you ever tire of being pummeled? Now go away chiuaua. You've already have recieved too much of my attention.

Here's the dictionary. FOOL

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/going

(09-05-2010 07:53 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  PUT UP OR SHUT UP TIME.

Gladly you f*cking c*nt.

Quote:Machiavelli Wrote:
I could care less when you edited it.

I know that mach. If you cared when I edited it, you'd admit that when you posted this:

Quote:
What's crazy and he's been called out by me before on this. On post 28. At first he said there was only one article. The Daily Kos one. Now when you go back he edited it. Now it says "one of the first one he came across was a Daily Kos poll". So my argument the last four posts now is muted. He never said it was only one post. Niner you are a fraud of the FIRST ORDER. You went back and edited out where you said you only found one article.

and this

Quote:
Wow, why did you edit that out Niner????????????????

and then this

Quote:
I WANT THE TRUTH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Why did you edit out that you could only find one article!

you were too ignorant to realize edits are time stamped, and thus I could not possibly have gone back to edit post 28 to "mute" your argument.

It's really ok mach. Most morons don't know they're morons. I don't expect anything more from you. But the laugh I've gotten out of you showing it yet again will last me the week.

Nighty night.

Thread. Your stupidity about me editing starts at post 114.

I was man enough to admit my mistake when you caught it. I'm quite certain you won't be you worthless piece of sh!t.

Niner.

One would think someone would be a tad more humble with said embarassment. I mean you have been shown a fool. You called someone out with "a bait". Then go on and on about it. Why on Earth someone would say the idiotic things you said without the facts is beyond me. If I ever called someone out the way you did and THEN that exact same day start another one. Just show the thread. I believe we are arguing two different scenarios. Wouldn't be the 1st time you've been wrong. OBVIOUSLY.

(09-05-2010 08:08 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Niner.

One would think someone would be a tad more humble with said embarassment. I mean you have been shown a fool. You called someone out with "a bait". Then go on and on about it. Why on Earth someone would say the idiotic things you said without the facts is beyond me. If I ever called someone out the way you did and THEN that exact same day start another one. Just show the thread. I believe we are arguing two different scenarios. Wouldn't be the 1st time you've been wrong. OBVIOUSLY.

Thanks for proving my point. You're not willing to admit you made a mistake. It's not in your chemistry. You're not a man of character. You're a liar and scum.

I had facts mach, nice try to rewrite history. I had a chart I was going off of. When you pointed out I was wrong I went back and realized the chart I used for reference wasn't accurate. I acknowledge that mistake and granted your point that you did say buy BAC at its low point. You're not going to somehow get me to back off pointing out your lies and mistakes by going back to a mistake I made that I've already freely admitted to.

I did that because I'm a man mach. I know I make mistakes. And as what I posted above shows, you make mistakes and are wrong. The difference is you're a little b!tch who can't admit it. You choose to lie and dodge when you're proven wrong. You are a man of no character and no ethics.

You're a disgrace. I feel pity for your family to have to be led by a man as deficient as you in character. I can only hope your kids look to your wife as their example.

F8ck you and die.

(09-05-2010 07:53 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  

Quote:The fact that you willfully ignore facts and continue your lies shows the type of person you are.

Prove it. Show the threads were I said what you claim I said. You've been sprouting this tripe for too long. I can't remember exactly what it was, but you claim this happened. Prove it. I am aware of two things in that particular thread. I remember I commented specifically you like to change arguments in mid stream. You extrapoliated that defense with the time stamp. I let it go. Thinking at the time I'll just make sure to copy everything you say so you don't have the same chance. PUT UP OR SHUT UP TIME.

Let's start with this bull. Niner has been spouting this tripe? You let it go?

Every time you get into a dispute with him, YOU always start copying his posts and make your same wrong accusation that you are doing so because you have caught him editing. YOU bring this up, not Niner.

The man made a mistake. He admitted it. You, you little snot-nosed punk, never will.

(09-05-2010 07:49 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Paul.... this is so tiresome really.

The act of going. I was going to give someone something.

Here's a definition
the act of departing
departure, going away, leaving


by defintion. I was going to give SOAF some neg ratings. As in I was going to leave him ratings. I thought better of it. I deleted said ratings. This whole act. You're a buffoon. I left SOAF neg ratings and took them back. "I was going to give him neg ratings", then I "I thought WHY????" This whole exercise in semantics.............. REALLY?????? This is like the fish sandwich debate with Fo. Does it really FCKIN MATTER if it was a Walleye sandwich or Perch. Seriously DUDE. Your fckin retarded. STOP.

(09-05-2010 07:58 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Seriously PAUL

Don't you ever tire of being pummeled? Now go away chiuaua. You've already have recieved too much of my attention.

Here's the dictionary. FOOL

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/going

Now for this bull.

I have no idea whether or not the mods can look at the logs and back-up what I said or not. I don't know if anyone including Sum knows what you did. I went out on a limb without proof of your lie and gambled that I wouldn't look the fool. Thank you for at least offering the proof of your lie, even if you can't admit it is a lie. You could have remained silent, dumbasss.

(08-31-2010 12:33 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  How do they work? SOAF gave me 4 neg 3's. I was going to return in kind but then I thought, Why???????

As I pointed out in that topic and this one, that is a bold face lie. You DID give him negs. I assumed you were the one who deleted them. I was right. 9 days later you want to lie and say you didn't. Now you admit your lie and spin it.

This isn't semantics. You lied.

And thanks for the Walleye/Perch mention. You can't help but read my posts. You are right that the kind of sandwich didn't matter. But that wasn't my point. You were questioning Torch's memory and I just offered the proof that yours was faulty regarding that topic.

I have been pummeled on occasions in my life. You have yet to cause a minor twitch in my furthest extremities.

Edit: added "s" on the last your.

Ohhh Niner. I just reread that thread. Two points.

1. This wasn't the first time obviously I accused you of it.

2. In that particular thread you covered your tracks 4 whole hours before I mentioned it. It's just amazing. Now, what I question. Is this habitual or did you edit it out without malice. I don't know. I just know that you do it. Editing it out before I bring it up doesn't mean you didn't do it.

I'll keep on copying and pasting your responses with me. Avoids the confusion. Have a wonderful night. I know I will. BWAHHAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!

(09-05-2010 08:58 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Ohhh Niner. I just reread that thread. Two points.

1. This wasn't the first time obviously I accused you of it.

2. In that particular thread you covered your tracks 4 whole hours before I mentioned it. It's just amazing. Now, what I question. Is this habitual or did you edit it out without malice. I don't know. I just know that you do it. Editing it out before I bring it up doesn't mean you didn't do it.

I'll keep on copying and pasting your responses with me. Avoids the confusion. Have a wonderful night. I know I will. BWAHHAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!

You're a liar of the first order. The artful dodge doesn't change it.

You admit you have no proof I change posts. You know you're lying, but you don't care. It shows your lack of character and the kind of person you are. You can't run from that, you can't ignore that, you can't spin it away.

You are a deplorable thing. I'm sure you will sleep well. People with no conscience usually do.

The character bit. Too rich............. I mean seriously.......... This is "THE BEST THREAD EVAHHHHHHH". You don't know when to let go. Then go with the righteous indignation route. Ohhh gawd. spare me.................

(09-05-2010 07:49 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Paul.... this is so tiresome really.

The act of going. I was going to give someone something.

Here's a definition
the act of departing
departure, going away, leaving


by defintion. I was going to give SOAF some neg ratings. As in I was going to leave him ratings. I thought better of it. I deleted said ratings. This whole act. You're a buffoon. I left SOAF neg ratings and took them back. "I was going to give him neg ratings", then I "I thought WHY????" This whole exercise in semantics.............. REALLY?????? This is like the fish sandwich debate with Fo. Does it really FCKIN MATTER if it was a Walleye sandwich or Perch. Seriously DUDE. Your fckin retarded. STOP.

And you used the wrong definition, Teach.
Google "going to" not going, stupido.

Quote:Here's a definition
the act of departing
departure, going away, leaving

Ah, wrong.

Your statement "I was going to" was

a 1) planned actions in the future

You were "going to" give him negs but didn't.

As you yourself now admit, you did give him negs.

Who's the buffoon? Who's retarded? Come on, say it, it's you.

Dude.... your thread offered no proof................ You can't prove it. I can't prove it. I just know you do it. Conciously, Subconciously. I don't know. I just know it happens. I'll keep copying in our discussions. There's a pattern there.


As for the mistake. I don't know when I'll make a mistake. I try not to call people out. If I ever do. I'll try to make sure I have some facts. If.... I mean if I make a mistake. (There was one time in 2nd grade when I finished 2nd in the spelling bee.) I mean. I know I'm capable of making a mistake. I just can't remember the last time I did. You'll say the stimulus thing. Understand. I choose not to defend it. It very well might have worked. No one will ever know because we don't know where we would have been without it. You could argue Obama and the deficit, but you really can't even call that a "mistake" per say. I said if Obama doesn't do x I'll do y. So even there, it's not really a mistake. Just lost a bet. But if I do ever make a mistake I'll try to be a little more humble than you.

Now I've been wondering. What have you learned from tonight's mistake and what will you do in the future to not repeat it? Do some introspection here. This could become a positive for you. Some lemons and lemonade kind of thing.

(09-05-2010 08:58 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Ohhh Niner. I just reread that thread. Two points.

1. This wasn't the first time obviously I accused you of it.

2. In that particular thread you covered your tracks 4 whole hours before I mentioned it. It's just amazing. Now, what I question. Is this habitual or did you edit it out without malice. I don't know. I just know that you do it. Editing it out before I bring it up doesn't mean you didn't do it.

I'll keep on copying and pasting your responses with me. Avoids the confusion. Have a wonderful night. I know I will. BWAHHAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!

This is un-freaking-believable.

(09-05-2010 09:12 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  Dude.... your thread offered no proof................ You can't prove it. I can't prove it. I just know you do it. Conciously, Subconciously. I don't know. I just know it happens. I'll keep copying in our discussions. There's a pattern there.


As for the mistake. I don't know when I'll make a mistake. I try not to call people out. If I ever do. I'll try to make sure I have some facts. If.... I mean if I make a mistake. (There was one time in 2nd grade when I finished 2nd in the spelling bee.) I mean. I know I'm capable of making a mistake. I just can't remember the last time I did. You'll say the stimulus thing. Understand. I choose not to defend it. It very well might have worked. No one will ever know because we don't know where we would have been without it. You could argue Obama and the deficit, but you really can't even call that a "mistake" per say. I said if Obama doesn't do x I'll do y. So even there, it's not really a mistake. Just lost a bet.

Now I've been wondering. What have you learned from tonight's mistake and what will you do in the future to not repeat it? Do some introspection here. This could become a positive for you. Some lemons and lemonade kind of thing.

This is more unbelievable than the last. Proof? I thought you had finally figured this out. THE TIME STAMPS!!!

Your last paragraph, I hope you save that crap for the little children and don't pull that in life with men because I hope you know any man would knock your teeth out for that sh!t. On further introspection, go ahead, talk like that to a man.

I want to, but I can't let this go.

There's a crime at 6 o clock. The robber leaves fingerprints. The robber then goes back at midnight and erases the finger prints. "THE next day" Cop says the robber probably went back and erased his fingerprints.

How is this different from what you did?

(09-05-2010 09:40 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  I want to, but I can't let this go.

There's a crime at 6 o clock. The robber leaves fingerprints. The robber then goes back at midnight and erases the finger prints. Cop says the robber probably went back and erased his fingerprints.

How is this different from what you did?

Wow...you really are just that stupid.

The time stamp of the post you are obsessed with was 7:10 PM. My edit was 7:11 PM. That is one minute afterwards.

You then post this

Quote:What's crazy and he's been called out by me before on this. On post 28. At first he said there was only one article. The Daily Kos one. Now when you go back he edited it. Now it says "one of the first one he came across was a Daily Kos poll". So my argument the last four posts now is muted. He never said it was only one post. Niner you are a fraud of the FIRST ORDER. You went back and edited out where you said you only found one article.

What time did you post this? 12:37 AM. A full 5 hours and 26 minutes after I made my edit. Your first post following my edit? 7:28 PM, a full 17 minutes after. The first of the four posts you reference? 12:25 AM. You were accusing me of editing my post at 7:11 PM to mute an attack you started at 12:25 AM.

So in your warped and deluded mind, you really think I edited a post, one minute after I posted it, in anticipation of what you would say about it 5 hours and 26 minutes later? That I could tell the future as to what your attack on my post would be, therefore 5 hours and 26 minutes before said attack, I edited my post to "mute" your attack?

Do you even approach the ability to realize how f*cking stupid that is?

Holy sh!t you are crazy as a sh!thouse rat.

(09-05-2010 09:40 PM)Machiavelli Wrote:  I want to, but I can't let this go.

There's a crime at 6 o clock. The robber leaves fingerprints. The robber then goes back at midnight and erases the finger prints. "THE next day" Cop says the robber probably went back and erased his fingerprints.

How is this different from what you did?

I understand your point in the thread you provided. In this case there is zero evidence of you editing out anything to mute my argument. I made a mistake in that thread.