MG61
Heisman
Posts: 5,137
Joined: Jun 2010
Reputation: 79
I Root For: UNT
Location:
|
RE: Ranking sunbelt receivers
(08-06-2010 04:35 PM)BlueRaiderFan. Wrote: (08-06-2010 03:49 PM)MG61 Wrote: Curious. Who besides some muts posters actually rate their receivers ahead of Troy and the best in the Belt ? Can any of you muts link us with any source other that muts posters ? IMHO the muts have the 3rd or 4th best receiving crew.:odie:
Don't blow your top. We have to have something to debate for a few more weeks.
I'm not blowing my top.....geeze. Just waiting for a link or links to a source or sources that is more credible than the homer muts posters making the claim. It's not a debate, it's just a muts claim:odie:
|
|
08-06-2010 04:45 PM |
|
BlueRaiderFan.
1st String
Posts: 2,223
Joined: May 2010
Reputation: 92
I Root For: Middle Tennesse
Location:
|
RE: Ranking sunbelt receivers
Would you accept a hastily made blog or bleacher report?
|
|
08-06-2010 05:25 PM |
|
MG61
Heisman
Posts: 5,137
Joined: Jun 2010
Reputation: 79
I Root For: UNT
Location:
|
RE: Ranking sunbelt receivers
(08-06-2010 05:25 PM)BlueRaiderFan. Wrote: Would you accept a hastily made blog or bleacher report?
|
|
08-06-2010 05:27 PM |
|
RaiderATO
Puddin' Stick
Posts: 6,093
Joined: May 2005
Reputation: 139
I Root For: MiddleTennessee
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
|
RE: Ranking sunbelt receivers
I think a fan of each team should get on here and list all of their WRs, adding an often baseless description afterward with "he is set to have a breakout season" or "he carved up HS competition" and possibly "he was solid at a JUCO" etc. and have no one read any of it.
It'll be a solid thread, I promise.
|
|
08-06-2010 06:37 PM |
|
trojanbrutha
Beltbbs Troy Football INsider
Posts: 4,622
Joined: Nov 2007
Reputation: 82
I Root For: TROY
Location: Greenville, AL
|
RE: Ranking sunbelt receivers
(08-06-2010 06:37 PM)Raider_ATO Wrote: I think a fan of each team should get on here and list all of their WRs, adding an often baseless description afterward with "he is set to have a breakout season" or "he carved up HS competition" and possibly "he was solid at a JUCO" etc. and have no one read any of it.
It'll be a solid thread, I promise.
Ohhhh! So that's what sarcasm is?
|
|
08-06-2010 07:39 PM |
|
MTPiKapp
Socialist
Posts: 16,860
Joined: Dec 2007
Reputation: 716
I Root For: MiddleTennessee
Location: Roswell, GA
|
RE: Ranking sunbelt receivers
(08-06-2010 03:49 PM)MG61 Wrote: Curious. Who besides some muts posters actually rate their receivers ahead of Troy and the best in the Belt ? Can any of you muts link us with any source other that muts posters ? IMHO the muts have the 3rd or 4th best receiving crew.:odie:
In my post I openly stated that it was my opinion by season's end we would have the second best group in the conference. I think that our guys are very underrated just because there isn't a real established number one guy in the bunch, but I believe that there are several who have the ability to fill that role. You're saying we have the 3rd or 4th I'm saying we have the 2nd, we're not really that far apart.
|
|
08-07-2010 11:10 AM |
|
MG61
Heisman
Posts: 5,137
Joined: Jun 2010
Reputation: 79
I Root For: UNT
Location:
|
RE: Ranking sunbelt receivers
(08-07-2010 11:10 AM)MTPiKapp Wrote: (08-06-2010 03:49 PM)MG61 Wrote: Curious. Who besides some muts posters actually rate their receivers ahead of Troy and the best in the Belt ? Can any of you muts link us with any source other that muts posters ? IMHO the muts have the 3rd or 4th best receiving crew.:odie:
In my post I openly stated that it was my opinion by season's end we would have the second best group in the conference. I think that our guys are very underrated just because there isn't a real established number one guy in the bunch, but I believe that there are several who have the ability to fill that role. You're saying we have the 3rd or 4th I'm saying we have the 2nd, we're not really that far apart.
OK, I'll agree it's just YOUR opinion.:odie:
|
|
08-07-2010 11:16 AM |
|
MTPiKapp
Socialist
Posts: 16,860
Joined: Dec 2007
Reputation: 716
I Root For: MiddleTennessee
Location: Roswell, GA
|
RE: Ranking sunbelt receivers
(08-07-2010 11:16 AM)MG61 Wrote: (08-07-2010 11:10 AM)MTPiKapp Wrote: (08-06-2010 03:49 PM)MG61 Wrote: Curious. Who besides some muts posters actually rate their receivers ahead of Troy and the best in the Belt ? Can any of you muts link us with any source other that muts posters ? IMHO the muts have the 3rd or 4th best receiving crew.:odie:
In my post I openly stated that it was my opinion by season's end we would have the second best group in the conference. I think that our guys are very underrated just because there isn't a real established number one guy in the bunch, but I believe that there are several who have the ability to fill that role. You're saying we have the 3rd or 4th I'm saying we have the 2nd, we're not really that far apart.
OK, I'll agree it's just YOUR opinion.:odie:
Isn't that what I said? Isn't pre-season prognostication always an opinion? Whether it be mine, yours, Stockstill's, Dodge's, Phil Steele's, etc.? If you know anyone who's pre-season prognostications are fact, let me know who they are so I can talk to them and head to Vegas.
|
|
08-07-2010 11:59 AM |
|
MG61
Heisman
Posts: 5,137
Joined: Jun 2010
Reputation: 79
I Root For: UNT
Location:
|
RE: Ranking sunbelt receivers
(08-07-2010 11:59 AM)MTPiKapp Wrote: (08-07-2010 11:16 AM)MG61 Wrote: (08-07-2010 11:10 AM)MTPiKapp Wrote: (08-06-2010 03:49 PM)MG61 Wrote: Curious. Who besides some muts posters actually rate their receivers ahead of Troy and the best in the Belt ? Can any of you muts link us with any source other that muts posters ? IMHO the muts have the 3rd or 4th best receiving crew.:odie:
In my post I openly stated that it was my opinion by season's end we would have the second best group in the conference. I think that our guys are very underrated just because there isn't a real established number one guy in the bunch, but I believe that there are several who have the ability to fill that role. You're saying we have the 3rd or 4th I'm saying we have the 2nd, we're not really that far apart.
OK, I'll agree it's just YOUR opinion.:odie:
Isn't that what I said? Isn't pre-season prognostication always an opinion? Whether it be mine, yours, Stockstill's, Dodge's, Phil Steele's, etc.? If you know anyone who's pre-season prognostications are fact, let me know who they are so I can talk to them and head to Vegas.
If you do go to Vegas, please say hello to my money for me.:odie:
|
|
08-07-2010 01:41 PM |
|
MTPiKapp
Socialist
Posts: 16,860
Joined: Dec 2007
Reputation: 716
I Root For: MiddleTennessee
Location: Roswell, GA
|
RE: Ranking sunbelt receivers
(08-07-2010 01:41 PM)MG61 Wrote: (08-07-2010 11:59 AM)MTPiKapp Wrote: (08-07-2010 11:16 AM)MG61 Wrote: (08-07-2010 11:10 AM)MTPiKapp Wrote: (08-06-2010 03:49 PM)MG61 Wrote: Curious. Who besides some muts posters actually rate their receivers ahead of Troy and the best in the Belt ? Can any of you muts link us with any source other that muts posters ? IMHO the muts have the 3rd or 4th best receiving crew.:odie:
In my post I openly stated that it was my opinion by season's end we would have the second best group in the conference. I think that our guys are very underrated just because there isn't a real established number one guy in the bunch, but I believe that there are several who have the ability to fill that role. You're saying we have the 3rd or 4th I'm saying we have the 2nd, we're not really that far apart.
OK, I'll agree it's just YOUR opinion.:odie:
Isn't that what I said? Isn't pre-season prognostication always an opinion? Whether it be mine, yours, Stockstill's, Dodge's, Phil Steele's, etc.? If you know anyone who's pre-season prognostications are fact, let me know who they are so I can talk to them and head to Vegas.
If you do go to Vegas, please say hello to my money for me.:odie:
Does it look anything like this?
|
|
08-07-2010 01:45 PM |
|