(08-08-2009 05:44 PM)Paul M Wrote: (08-08-2009 01:34 PM)RobertN Wrote: I don't buy that anyone can know if something this complicated will be a success or a failure until it is implemented and has been around a few years.
It's real easy to look around the world and see what works and what doesn't. It's simple as pie to look at what government already has straped us with and see they just aren't any good at any thing. And it's insane to find what doesn't work and say "hey, why don't we try that sh!tty system?"
That's what's so frustrating to me about this. The dems are determined to push things that have been found wanting everywhere they've been tried. The republicans have a great opportunity to look around, see what works, and adopt it as theirs, but instead they are just saying "no" to the democrat proposals.
What are some things we could do?
The French universal
private-sector free-market health care plan.
The Brazilian "all hands on deck" approach to energy self-sufficency.
The Norwegian and New Zealand (two countries that are greener than we are) approach to allowing offshore oil and gas drilling.
The Swedish (Swedish!!!!) privatization of social security.
The Swedish (Sweden again, and don't laugh, their air force is one of the best in the world), Israeli, and Swiss use of reserve forces to build a strong military withot spending an arm and a leg.
The European/Japanese high speed rail systems and urban mass transit.
The tax approach implemented by the former Soviet satellites in eastern Europe, consisting of flat taxes at relatively low levels applied equally to three different tax bases--payroll, business profits, and consumption--about 15 percent each.
The education systems used by every country in the worldwide top-10 (we are not) where students are placed on three or more different tracks depending on ability and interests.
Those would all be better approaches than anything that either democrats or republicans have placed on the table.