+- CSNbbs (https://csnbbs.com)
+-- Forum: Active Boards (/forum-769.html)
+--- Forum: AACbbs (/forum-460.html)
+---- Forum: Members (/forum-401.html)
+----- Forum: MemphisTigers.org (/forum-446.html)
+------ Forum: Dockery-Finch Memorial Tiger Sports Forum (/forum-499.html)
+------ Thread: Tigers - Statistics - Ranking (/thread-840850.html)
Tigers - Statistics - Ranking - Tiger1983 - 01-23-2018 09:58 AM
I derived a statistical ranking summary as of 1/21/18. It ranks where the Tigers rank by category (eg, scoring offense) by range. For example, we are in the top 25% in D-1 in seven categories.
0% to 25%: 7
26% to 50%: 5
51% to 75%: 13
76% to 100%: 7
Source: http://web1.ncaa.org/stats/StatsSrv/ranksummary
RE: Tigers - Statistics - Ranking - ncrdbl1 - 01-23-2018 03:47 PM
Official ranking unadjusted raw numbers 1/2/18
Scoring off 274th
Scoring Def 117th
Scoring Margin 217th
FG% 202nd
FG%Def 104th
3 FG per game 327th
3 FG% 344th
3 FG Def 296th
FT% 232nd
Rebound Margin 128th
Asst per game 241st
Ass/To ratio 264th
Blocked Shot per game 79th
Steals per game 199th
Turnovers Per game 224th
Turnover Margin 239th
PF per game 45th
Total Blocks 74th
Total Asst 230th
Total rebounds 187th
FT Attempts 46th
FT made 60th
3 FT attempts 280th
Total 3 FG made 321st
Total Steals 190th
Fewest Turnovers 237th
Fewest Fouls 68th
Off Rebounds per game 61st
Def rebounds per game 302nd
Turnovers forced 206th
Total Rebounds per game 205th
RE: Tigers - Statistics - Ranking - NigelTufnel - 01-24-2018 09:55 AM
(01-23-2018 03:47 PM)ncrdbl1 Wrote: Official ranking unadjusted raw numbers 1/2/18
Scoring off 274th
Scoring Def 117th
Scoring Margin 217th
FG% 202nd
FG%Def 104th
3 FG per game 327th
3 FG% 344th
3 FG Def 296th
FT% 232nd
Rebound Margin 128th
Asst per game 241st
Ass/To ratio 264th
Blocked Shot per game 79th
Steals per game 199th
Turnovers Per game 224th
Turnover Margin 239th
PF per game 45th
Total Blocks 74th
Total Asst 230th
Total rebounds 187th
FT Attempts 46th
FT made 60th
3 FT attempts 280th
Total 3 FG made 321st
Total Steals 190th
Fewest Turnovers 237th
Fewest Fouls 68th
Off Rebounds per game 61st
Def rebounds per game 302nd
Turnovers forced 206th
Total Rebounds per game 205th
In other words, chuck it up, rebound it and get fouled.
RE: Tigers - Statistics - Ranking - holyterror - 01-24-2018 09:59 AM
Kinda hard to believe those numbers add up to a winning record.
RE: Tigers - Statistics - Ranking - gusrob - 01-24-2018 10:06 AM
(01-24-2018 09:59 AM)holyterror Wrote: Kinda hard to believe those numbers add up to a winning record.
it wouldn't vs decent competition
RE: Tigers - Statistics - Ranking - salukiblue - 01-24-2018 10:49 AM
Memphis' record of 13-7 outperfoms their +/- of +0.4.
Most upper tier conference teams who have a near 0.0 +/- hover around .500.
RE: Tigers - Statistics - Ranking - holyterror - 01-24-2018 10:58 AM
(01-24-2018 10:06 AM)gusrob Wrote:(01-24-2018 09:59 AM)holyterror Wrote: Kinda hard to believe those numbers add up to a winning record.
it wouldn't vs decent competition
Yep. 16-16, here we come. Yay.
RE: Tigers - Statistics - Ranking - cmt - 01-24-2018 03:35 PM
(01-24-2018 10:58 AM)holyterror Wrote:(01-24-2018 10:06 AM)gusrob Wrote:(01-24-2018 09:59 AM)holyterror Wrote: Kinda hard to believe those numbers add up to a winning record.
it wouldn't vs decent competition
Yep. 16-16, here we come. Yay.
I think we'll still have a winning record, because we've already won the games we weren't supposed to.
RE: Tigers - Statistics - Ranking - macgar32 - 01-25-2018 11:34 AM
(01-24-2018 10:49 AM)salukiblue Wrote: Memphis' record of 13-7 outperfoms their +/- of +0.4.
Most upper tier conference teams who have a near 0.0 +/- hover around .500.
That's because when we lose we do it by double digits
RE: Tigers - Statistics - Ranking - salukiblue - 01-25-2018 11:56 AM
(01-25-2018 11:34 AM)macgar32 Wrote:(01-24-2018 10:49 AM)salukiblue Wrote: Memphis' record of 13-7 outperfoms their +/- of +0.4.
Most upper tier conference teams who have a near 0.0 +/- hover around .500.
That's because when we lose we do it by double digits
...and that is usually a trademark of a team more in the range of a .500 record.
RE: Tigers - Statistics - Ranking - macgar32 - 01-25-2018 11:18 PM
(01-25-2018 11:56 AM)salukiblue Wrote:(01-25-2018 11:34 AM)macgar32 Wrote:(01-24-2018 10:49 AM)salukiblue Wrote: Memphis' record of 13-7 outperfoms their +/- of +0.4.
Most upper tier conference teams who have a near 0.0 +/- hover around .500.
That's because when we lose we do it by double digits
...and that is usually a trademark of a team more in the range of a .500 record.
If you watch Memphis they don't have guys who continue to play when they get up.
They stop running start walking the ball up and Martin turns his switch off unless he us making shots. We just aren't going to blow many teams out. That is on Tubby for allowing different intensity levels... You should play the same regardless of score
And losing games by double digits is not a sign of a .500 team. It's all about who they are losing to... Problem is Memphis ain't losing to world beaters
RE: Tigers - Statistics - Ranking - Dylan - 01-25-2018 11:20 PM
(01-25-2018 11:18 PM)macgar32 Wrote:(01-25-2018 11:56 AM)salukiblue Wrote:(01-25-2018 11:34 AM)macgar32 Wrote:(01-24-2018 10:49 AM)salukiblue Wrote: Memphis' record of 13-7 outperfoms their +/- of +0.4.
Most upper tier conference teams who have a near 0.0 +/- hover around .500.
That's because when we lose we do it by double digits
...and that is usually a trademark of a team more in the range of a .500 record.
If you watch Memphis they don't have guys who continue to play when they get up.
They stop running start walking the ball up and Martin turns his switch off unless he us making shots. We just aren't going to blow many teams out. That is on Tubby for allowing different intensity levels... You should play the same regardless of score
We’ve had to make frantic comebacks in 7 of our 13 wins. Four of them we didn’t lead until the last minute. That’s why our point differential is so low.