(03-26-2024 09:13 AM)randyfensfanclub1 Wrote: (03-26-2024 07:57 AM)HuskiePride12 Wrote: Not even going to read the article.
If NIU was playing the way they did from 2010-2014 right now we would have been in the AAC already. When they lost cincy and everyone to the big 12
Realignment is about football, markets and then more of that.
They were never going to AAC. Pipedream.
They never fit the mold of items like metro area/location, endowment, notoriety, multi-sport success over time. Not every member has all, but they have multiple.
The threads are there. Let's not re-write history.
Funny, because I think some believed NIU was above AAC. B12 or bust as NIU had it all.
Come to think of it, perhaps that is the biggest reason the belief that the 2 in charge of academics and sports "ruined it all."
Newsflash, NIU never had it other than football and some high enrollment for a time. The downfall was decades in the making. This group is what, 15 years old? The threads are there.
Agreed.
The AAC wasn't adding schools because they kicked azz at football.
They added:
UAB - Enrollment: 22,500, Endowment: $711M, Birmingham pop: 200k
FAU - Enrollment: 30,100, Endowment: $285M, Boca Raton pop: 97k (Miami metro: 6.138M)
Charlotte - Enrollment: 29,551, Endowment $314M, Charlotte pop: 875k
North Texas - Enrollment: 47k, Endowment: $292M, Denton pop: 140k (D-FW: 7.6M)
Rice - Enrollment: 8k, Endowment: $7.814B, Houston pop: 2.3M
UTSA - Enrollment: 34,742, Endowment: $277M, San Antonio pop: 1.434M
Let's compare that to:
NIU - Enrollment: 15,649, Endowment: $99.8M, DeKalb pop: 40k (which is down)
Simply put, NIU wasn't getting an invite. Some of those schools are good at football and some of them are not, but what they do have is (in some form or fashion), bodies and money.
Rice is the only outlier due to enrollment but they have a zillion dollars in their bank account, are a historic university and are located within the boundaries of the 4th largest city in America. They were also probably tabbed as a replacement for losing Houston.