(03-18-2024 11:19 AM)TDenverFan Wrote: I like the idea the CIT had this year, create four pods of four teams, then have the winners of each mini tournament compete for the CIT title.
For example, Tarleton is hosting a pod with three other Texas teams. That seems like it would be better for fan interest, and reduce travel costs.
Obviously it didn't wind up working out, there weren't 16 teams interested in competing, but it wasn't a bad idea.
The pods are a good idea. Helps interest and attendance. I’m not sure precisely what the CIT structure is (meaning how they get paid) but having good attendance boosts a lot of things.
But the reason I like these tournaments, even if it’s pay to play, is that they are there for the teams/schools that need them. If a school doesn’t need it, fine. They can sit at home. But a team like High Point that won 24 or 25 games, they need to keep playing and see how far they can go. They have a first year coach who completely turned things around and built a lot of excitement on campus and they need to capitalize on it.
Chicago State has little history of success and only has one previous post season experience. They need it to help build momentum going into a new conference, because they had no conference tournament to play in the last couple of years and no realistic post season access, and as a feather in their cap for a season where they accomplished far more than has been the norm for them, even if it appears modest to an outside observer.
But more than anything, I see this as a treat for their players, most of whom are from Florida (the whole tournament is in Daytona Beach) and the fans at home who have not gotten to see them play in person hardly at all. Their road game at Stetson was the only game close to Florida, and they had a bigger crowd in attendance than they have at almost any home game all season. So maybe paying to play in this tournament is the school doing something for its players who have come so far to play there.
Maybe it’s nothing more than boost for overall morale, but that stuff can help turn things around. Knowing your school is behind you isn’t something all low major players in poorly funded programs always feel. If nothing else, if you have recruits in the pipeline (since most of their recruits come from that area) that can come see you play in person, to meet the team, for the coach to make personal contact with players and their parents, to see them have far more support than the other team most likely, that can pay off big too. For Chicago State, if you look it as a recruiting expense, that’s money well spent. Like I said, it all just depends on if a school needs the tournament, or if they don’t.
I doubt there is team in any non NCAA tournament who is more grateful than Chicago State considering what I explained about the tournament location, where they get players, and where they have the most friends, family and support.
As usual, I’ve turned a post into a novel, but I felt there was a lot to explain about why I feel like I do about these much maligned tournaments.