Mon 3/4
No games scheduled


Tue 3/5
Tulane 13-16 (4-13) NET 140 Q3 72
24 South Florida 23-5 (16-1) NET 79 Q2 85


Wed 3/6
Rice 11-19 (5-12) NET 237 Q4 64
Charlotte 18-11 (12-5) NET 110 Q2 69
CLT -7.5 | O/U 135.5

East Carolina 14-16 (7-10) NET 186 Q4 77
SMU 20-10 (11-6) NET 50 Q1 80
SMU -11.5 | O/U 140.5

FAU 23-7 (13-4) NET 37 Q2 80
North Texas 16-13 (9-8) NET 87 Q2 76
FAU -1.5 | O/U 136.5


Thu 3/7
UAB 19-11 (11-6) NET 128 Q3 100
Temple 11-19 (4-13) NET 214 Q3 72
UAB -2.5 | O/U 145.5


Fri 3/8
Wichita State 13-18 (5-13) NET 150 Q3 75
Tulane 14-16 (5-13) NET 140 Q3 85
9:00 PM ET / 8:00 PM CT ESPN2


Sat 3/9
Memphis 22-8 (11-6) NET 71 Q2
FAU 23-7 (13-4) NET 35 Q1
12:00 PM ET / 11:00 AM CT CBS

24 South Florida 23-5 (13-1) NET 79 Q3
Tulsa 15-14 (6-11) NET 197 Q3
3:00 PM ET / 2:00 PM CT ESPN+

Charlotte 18-11 (12-5) NET 110 Q3
East Carolina 14-16 (7-10) NET 185 Q3
4:00 PM ET / 3:00 PM CT ESPN+

North Texas 16-13 (9-8) NET 87 Q3
Rice 11-19 (5-12) NET 236 Q3
8:00 PM ET / 7:00 PM CT ESPN+


Sun 3/10
Temple 11-18 (4-12) NET 214 Q4
UTSA 11-19 (5-12) NET 260 Q4
3:00 PM ET / 2:00 PM CT ESPN+

SMU 20-10 (11-6) NET 50 Q2
UAB 18-11 (10-6) NET 128 Q2
3:00 PM ET / 2:00 PM CT ESPN+

Standings

24 South Florida 23-5 (16-1)
Florida Atlantic 23-7 (13-4)
Charlotte 18-11 (12-5)
Memphis 22-8 (11-6)
SMU 20-10 (11-6)
UAB 19-11 (11-6)
North Texas 16-13 (9-8)
East Carolina 14-16 (7-10)
Tulsa 15-14 (6-11)
Rice 11-19 (5-12)
UTSA 11-19 (5-12)
Tulane 14-16 (5-13)
Wichita State 13-18 (5-13)
Temple 11-19 (4-13)

230-186 (0.553)

Out of Conference Play
Week 1: 24-5 (.828)
Week 2: 11-12 (.478)
Week 3: 19-12 (.613)
Week 4: 12-10 (.545)
Week 5: 9-11 (.450)
Week 6: 14-6 (.700)
Week 7: 14-6 (.700)
Week 8: 7-4 (.636)
OOC Total: 110-66 (.625)
End of Out of Conference Play

Conference Play
Week 9: 14-14 (.500)
Week 10: 11-11 (.500)
Week 11: 14-14 (.500)
Week 12: 13-13 (.500)
Week 13: 12-12 (.500)
Week 14: 13-13 (.500)
Week 15: 13-13 (.500)
Week 16: 12-12 (.500)
Week 17: 12-12 (.500)
Week 18: 6-6 (.500)

Season: 230-186 (.553)

Polls
Preseason
AP
10 FAU
ORV Memphis (7)

Coaches
9 FAU
ORV Memphis (3)


Week 2
AP
10 FAU
ORV Memphis (53)

Coaches
10 FAU
ORV Memphis (40)


Week 3
AP
19 FAU
ORV Memphis (149)

Coaches
20 FAU
23 Memphis


Week 4
AP
13 FAU
ORV Memphis (108)

Coaches
17 FAU
ORV Memphis (63)


Week 5
AP
11 FAU
ORV Memphis (5)

Coaches
9 FAU
ORV Memphis (9)


Week 6
AP
15 FAU
ORV Memphis (56)

Coaches
14 FAU
ORV Memphis (26)


Week 7
AP
14 FAU
23 Memphis

Coaches
12 FAU
23 Memphis


Week 8
AP
7 FAU
19 Memphis

Coaches
6 FAU
18 Memphis


Week 9
AP
15 Memphis
17 FAU

Coaches
15 Memphis
17 FAU

Week 10
AP
13 Memphis
24 FAU

Coaches
13 Memphis
25 FAU

Week 11
AP
10 Memphis
23 FAU

Coaches
12 Memphis
ORV FAU (67)

Week 12
AP
19 Memphis
22 FAU

Coaches
22 Memphis
24 FAU

Week 13
AP
20 FAU
ORV Memphis (48)

Coaches
23 FAU
ORV Memphis (26)

Week 14
AP
20 FAU
ORV Memphis (5)

Coaches
22 FAU

Week 15
AP
24 FAU
ORV Memphis (8), South Florida (7)

Coaches
ORV FAU (63), South Florida (5)

Week 16
AP
ORV South Florida (45), FAU (27)

Coaches
ORV South Florida (35), FAU (9)

Week 17
AP
25 USF
ORV FAU (8)

Coaches
25 USF
ORV

Week 18
AP
24 USF
ORV FAU (4)

Coaches
24 USF
ORV

Week 18 Top 25 Results

1. Houston 1-0
2. UConn 1-0
3. Purdue 1-0
4. Tennessee 1-0
5. Arizona 1-0
6. Iowa State 1-0
7. North Carolina 1-0
8. Marquette 0-1
9. Duke 1-0
10. Creighton
11. Baylor 1-0
12. Illinois 0-1
13. Auburn 1-0
14. Kansas 1-0
15. Kentucky 1-0
16. Alabama 0-1
17. South Carolina 0-1
18. Washington St 0-1
19. Gonzaga
20. BYU 0-1
21. San Diego St 0-2
22. Utah St 1-0
23. Saint Mary's
24. South Florida 1-0
25. Dayton 2-0
    

Let's review the top four conference teams as of now by comparing their schedules. Here is the preseason poll. FAU-1, Memphis-2, USF-9, Charlotte-13. Because USF and Charlotte were projected to be in the bottom half they were given the easiest schedules by quite a bit.



USF played 2 games against:
* #12 Temple
* #14 UTSA
* #13 Charlotte CBI Champions
* #11 Rice
* #10 Tulsa
USF played the five worst preseason teams twice. (avg. #12)

USF played 1 game against:
* #8 Wichita State
* #4 UAB
* #2 Memphis
* #5 ECU
* #6 North Texas
* #1 FAU
* #3 Tulane
* #7 SMU
USF played the top 8 preseason teams only once.

Charlotte played two games against:
* #9 USF
* #14 UTSA
* #5 ECU
* #11 Rice
* #10 Tulsa
Charlotte played only one team in the upper half twice.


Charlotte played 1 game against:
* #8 Wichita State
* #4 UAB
* #2 Memphis
* #12 Temple
* #6 North Texas
* #1 FAU
* #3 Tulane
* #7 SMU
Charlotte played the top four preseason teams just once each.


FAU played 5 teams twice. #2 Memphis, #6 North Texas, #8 Wichita State, #4 UAB, #3 Tulane. Four teams in the top half. (avg. #4.6)

FAU played 8 teams once. #5 ECU, #13 Charlotte, #14 UTSA, #11 Rice, #10 Tulsa, #12 Temple, #9 USF, #7 SMU. Six teams in the bottom half. (avg. #9.5)


Memphis played 5 teams twice. #7 SMU, #3 Tulane, #8 Wichita State, #4 UAB, #1 FAU. Four teams in the top half. (avg. #4.6)

Memphis played 8 teams once. #5 ECU, #13 Charlotte, #14 UTSA, #11 Rice, #10 Tulsa, #12 Temple, #9 USF, #6 North Texas. (avg. #9.375)

Memphis and FAU by far had the most difficult schedules in the conference by far, if you go by preseason rankings.

I get trying not trying to hurt the favorites to keep their Net up, but they may have hurt the teams they were trying to protect. Both Memphis and FAU are in danger of not making the tournament. Especially Memphis.

(03-05-2024 07:07 PM)Memphis Yankee Wrote:  Let's review the top four conference teams as of now by comparing their schedules. Here is the preseason poll. FAU-1, Memphis-2, USF-9, Charlotte-13. Because USF and Charlotte were projected to be in the bottom half they were given the easiest schedules by quite a bit.



USF played 2 games against:
* #12 Temple
* #14 UTSA
* #13 Charlotte CBI Champions
* #11 Rice
* #10 Tulsa
USF played the five worst preseason teams twice. (avg. #12)

USF played 1 game against:
* #8 Wichita State
* #4 UAB
* #2 Memphis
* #5 ECU
* #6 North Texas
* #1 FAU
* #3 Tulane
* #7 SMU
USF played the top 8 preseason teams only once.

Charlotte played two games against:
* #9 USF
* #14 UTSA
* #5 ECU
* #11 Rice
* #10 Tulsa
Charlotte played only one team in the upper half twice.


Charlotte played 1 game against:
* #8 Wichita State
* #4 UAB
* #2 Memphis
* #12 Temple
* #6 North Texas
* #1 FAU
* #3 Tulane
* #7 SMU
Charlotte played the top four preseason teams just once each.


FAU played 5 teams twice. #2 Memphis, #6 North Texas, #8 Wichita State, #4 UAB, #3 Tulane. Four teams in the top half. (avg. #4.6)

FAU played 8 teams once. #5 ECU, #13 Charlotte, #14 UTSA, #11 Rice, #10 Tulsa, #12 Temple, #9 USF, #7 SMU. Six teams in the bottom half. (avg. #9.5)


Memphis played 5 teams twice. #7 SMU, #3 Tulane, #8 Wichita State, #4 UAB, #1 FAU. Four teams in the top half. (avg. #4.6)

Memphis played 8 teams once. #5 ECU, #13 Charlotte, #14 UTSA, #11 Rice, #10 Tulsa, #12 Temple, #9 USF, #6 North Texas. (avg. #9.375)

Memphis and FAU by far had the most difficult schedules in the conference by far, if you go by preseason rankings.

I get trying not trying to hurt the favorites to keep their Net up, but they may have hurt the teams they were trying to protect. Both Memphis and FAU are in danger of not making the tournament. Especially Memphis.

Memphis hurt itself by losing to lower teams like Tulane and Rice . Is a catch 22 if you play too many of the lower teams, then wins don’t help your NET and loses hurts more.
Even though USF won the league is paying for the easier schedule in the NET.

Can only beat the teams on the schedule. 16-1 in conference is amazing. Quit making excuses

I thought Memphis wanted to play ECU once

USF won games. There is very little anyone can argue against winning.

The league’s schedule was designed to provide the best opportunity for the projected best teams to maintain their NCAA Tournament resume. It was a wise strategy.

The problem is Memphis failure to win conference games and the failure of the rest of the conference (at this date) to replace Memphis - particularly USF who botched their OOC games.

(03-06-2024 09:04 AM)Tiger1983 Wrote:  The league’s schedule was designed to provide the best opportunity for the projected best teams to maintain their NCAA Tournament resume. It was a wise strategy.

The problem is Memphis failure to win conference games and the failure of the rest of the conference (at this date) to replace Memphis - particularly USF who botched their OOC games.

So you were set up to qualify for a high seed in the NCCAT and failed in conference. Who are you mad at?

USF improved immensely throughout the year. We knew we would be better as the year went on. New coach. New team. Nobody thought we'd improve this much though.

Edit: BTW I say failed because I think Memphis is a better team than they showed this year.

(03-06-2024 09:23 AM)Ocalabull Wrote:  

(03-06-2024 09:04 AM)Tiger1983 Wrote:  The league’s schedule was designed to provide the best opportunity for the projected best teams to maintain their NCAA Tournament resume. It was a wise strategy.

The problem is Memphis failure to win conference games and the failure of the rest of the conference (at this date) to replace Memphis - particularly USF who botched their OOC games.

So you were set up to qualify for a high seed in the NCCAT and failed in conference. Who are you mad at?

USF improved immensely throughout the year. We knew we would be better as the year went on. New coach. New team. Nobody thought we'd improve this much though.

Edit: BTW I say failed because I think Memphis is a better team than they showed this year.

I simply state a reasonable conclusion- namely Memphis’ failure to win conference games and USF’s failure to win OOC games and the rest of the conference’s failure to replace Memphis prevents the AAC from receiving two NCAA bids at this point.

I am unhappy the AAC to date has missed opportunities. Are you happy about it? SMH.

(03-06-2024 09:43 AM)Tiger1983 Wrote:  

(03-06-2024 09:23 AM)Ocalabull Wrote:  

(03-06-2024 09:04 AM)Tiger1983 Wrote:  The league’s schedule was designed to provide the best opportunity for the projected best teams to maintain their NCAA Tournament resume. It was a wise strategy.

The problem is Memphis failure to win conference games and the failure of the rest of the conference (at this date) to replace Memphis - particularly USF who botched their OOC games.

So you were set up to qualify for a high seed in the NCCAT and failed in conference. Who are you mad at?

USF improved immensely throughout the year. We knew we would be better as the year went on. New coach. New team. Nobody thought we'd improve this much though.

Edit: BTW I say failed because I think Memphis is a better team than they showed this year.

I simply state a reasonable conclusion- namely Memphis’ failure to win conference games and USF’s failure to win OOC games and the rest of the conference’s failure to replace Memphis prevents the AAC from receiving two NCAA bids at this point.

I am unhappy the AAC to date has missed opportunities. Are you happy about it? SMH.

My bad I thought you were the one that posted the large post too but see that was a different Memphis fan.

USF is now a Q2 home game!!!!!!!

(03-06-2024 10:37 AM)Ocalabull Wrote:  

(03-06-2024 09:43 AM)Tiger1983 Wrote:  

(03-06-2024 09:23 AM)Ocalabull Wrote:  

(03-06-2024 09:04 AM)Tiger1983 Wrote:  The league’s schedule was designed to provide the best opportunity for the projected best teams to maintain their NCAA Tournament resume. It was a wise strategy.

The problem is Memphis failure to win conference games and the failure of the rest of the conference (at this date) to replace Memphis - particularly USF who botched their OOC games.

So you were set up to qualify for a high seed in the NCCAT and failed in conference. Who are you mad at?

USF improved immensely throughout the year. We knew we would be better as the year went on. New coach. New team. Nobody thought we'd improve this much though.

Edit: BTW I say failed because I think Memphis is a better team than they showed this year.

I simply state a reasonable conclusion- namely Memphis’ failure to win conference games and USF’s failure to win OOC games and the rest of the conference’s failure to replace Memphis prevents the AAC from receiving two NCAA bids at this point.

I am unhappy the AAC to date has missed opportunities. Are you happy about it? SMH.

My bad I thought you were the one that posted the large post too but see that was a different Memphis fan.

No worries

(03-05-2024 09:52 PM)Sellular1 Wrote:  Can only beat the teams on the schedule. 16-1 in conference is amazing. Quit making excuses

Not making excuses. Trying to point out USF was given the weakest schedule according to preseason predictions. That award usually goes to the team predicted to finish last. USF was predicted to finish 9th. Charlotte played a weak schedule, but it was more difficult than USF's and they were predicted to finish 13th. Why? Is that an excuse or a fact? Is it an excuse or an observation?

Memphis and FAU were given the most difficult schedules and both are two spots lower than their predicted finish based on preseason rankings. That too is a fact.

Every team in the AAC play 5 teams twice, and 8 teams once. USF played the 5 lowest rated teams twice. That's a fact. Memphis and FAU played the highest rated teams twice. Fact. It would have been worse if they could have played themselves twice. lol

You just don't want anyone to point out the facts for discussion. Since you were being a wise guy, lets take it a step farther.

USF (Net 79) had a record of 7-4 OOC. You played 1 P5 team in Florida State State and won. FSU is 15-14, 9th in the ACC.

Memphis (Net 71) played 9 P5 teams going 10-2 with losses to Villanova and Ole Miss. The ACC teams we played and beat are in 3rd and 4th place. Virginia and Clemson. The four teams you lost to were C. Michigan, Maine, Hofstra, and UMass. Our so called bad losses came after losing two of our main players Mills and Brown. The four teams were USF, UAB, Tulane and Rice.

FAU (Net 35) played four P5 teams, Texas A&M, Virginia Tech, Illinois, and Arizona. They were 10-3 with losses to Illinois, Bryant and Florida Gulf Coast. They barely lost anything in the Net with their two bad losses. We were ranked 10th in the country at 15-2, and still only had a Net around 40. Kind of strange, don't you think.

As it stands USF is in the tournament. USF had 4 bad losses to our 2 bad losses. You have a NET of 79 to our NET of 71, and we're not in the tournament. FAU has 2 bad losses like Memphis, a NET of 35 to our 71 even though our overall records are almost the same. 22-8 vs 22-7. They played 4 P5 teams (to USF's 1), and Memphis played 9 P5 teams. FAU is also in the tournament. At least they played a difficult schedule as did Memphis.

What I don't understand is comparing the three of us, why we have to to win out to get into the tournament, and you two are already in. We had the most difficult schedule and the second highest NET. Something's not right.

(03-06-2024 01:05 PM)Memphis Yankee Wrote:  

(03-05-2024 09:52 PM)Sellular1 Wrote:  Can only beat the teams on the schedule. 16-1 in conference is amazing. Quit making excuses

Not making excuses. Trying to point out USF was given the weakest schedule according to preseason predictions. That award usually goes to the team predicted to finish last. USF was predicted to finish 9th. Charlotte played a weak schedule, but it was more difficult than USF's and they were predicted to finish 13th. Why? Is that an excuse or a fact? Is it an excuse or an observation?

Memphis and FAU were given the most difficult schedules and both are two spots lower than their predicted finish based on preseason rankings. That too is a fact.

Every team in the AAC play 5 teams twice, and 8 teams once. USF played the 5 lowest rated teams twice. That's a fact. Memphis and FAU played the highest rated teams twice. Fact. It would have been worse if they could have played themselves twice. lol

You just don't want anyone to point out the facts for discussion. Since you were being a wise guy, lets take it a step farther.

USF (Net 79) had a record of 7-4 OOC. You played 1 P5 team in Florida State State and won. FSU is 15-14, 9th in the ACC.

Memphis (Net 71) played 9 P5 teams going 10-2 with losses to Villanova and Ole Miss. The ACC teams we played and beat are in 3rd and 4th place. Virginia and Clemson. The four teams you lost to were C. Michigan, Maine, Hofstra, and UMass. Our so called bad losses came after losing two of our main players Mills and Brown. The four teams were USF, UAB, Tulane and Rice.

FAU (Net 35) played four P5 teams, Texas A&M, Virginia Tech, Illinois, and Arizona. They were 10-3 with losses to Illinois, Bryant and Florida Gulf Coast. They barely lost anything in the Net with their two bad losses. We were ranked 10th in the country at 15-2, and still only had a Net around 40. Kind of strange, don't you think.

As it stands USF is in the tournament. USF had 4 bad losses to our 2 bad losses. You have a NET of 79 to our NET of 71, and we're not in the tournament. FAU has 2 bad losses like Memphis, a NET of 35 to our 71 even though our overall records are almost the same. 22-8 vs 22-7. They played 4 P5 teams (to USF's 1), and Memphis played 9 P5 teams. FAU is also in the tournament. At least they played a difficult schedule as did Memphis.

What I don't understand is comparing the three of us, why we have to to win out to get into the tournament, and you two are already in. We had the most difficult schedule and the second highest NET. Something's not right.

Well USF beat both FAU and Memphis H2H...

Funny you left that out.

(03-06-2024 01:05 PM)Memphis Yankee Wrote:  

(03-05-2024 09:52 PM)Sellular1 Wrote:  Can only beat the teams on the schedule. 16-1 in conference is amazing. Quit making excuses

Not making excuses. Trying to point out USF was given the weakest schedule according to preseason predictions. That award usually goes to the team predicted to finish last. USF was predicted to finish 9th. Charlotte played a weak schedule, but it was more difficult than USF's and they were predicted to finish 13th. Why? Is that an excuse or a fact? Is it an excuse or an observation?

Memphis and FAU were given the most difficult schedules and both are two spots lower than their predicted finish based on preseason rankings. That too is a fact.

Every team in the AAC play 5 teams twice, and 8 teams once. USF played the 5 lowest rated teams twice. That's a fact. Memphis and FAU played the highest rated teams twice. Fact. It would have been worse if they could have played themselves twice. lol

You just don't want anyone to point out the facts for discussion. Since you were being a wise guy, lets take it a step farther.

USF (Net 79) had a record of 7-4 OOC. You played 1 P5 team in Florida State State and won. FSU is 15-14, 9th in the ACC.

Memphis (Net 71) played 9 P5 teams going 10-2 with losses to Villanova and Ole Miss. The ACC teams we played and beat are in 3rd and 4th place. Virginia and Clemson. The four teams you lost to were C. Michigan, Maine, Hofstra, and UMass. Our so called bad losses came after losing two of our main players Mills and Brown. The four teams were USF, UAB, Tulane and Rice.

FAU (Net 35) played four P5 teams, Texas A&M, Virginia Tech, Illinois, and Arizona. They were 10-3 with losses to Illinois, Bryant and Florida Gulf Coast. They barely lost anything in the Net with their two bad losses. We were ranked 10th in the country at 15-2, and still only had a Net around 40. Kind of strange, don't you think.

As it stands USF is in the tournament. USF had 4 bad losses to our 2 bad losses. You have a NET of 79 to our NET of 71, and we're not in the tournament. FAU has 2 bad losses like Memphis, a NET of 35 to our 71 even though our overall records are almost the same. 22-8 vs 22-7. They played 4 P5 teams (to USF's 1), and Memphis played 9 P5 teams. FAU is also in the tournament. At least they played a difficult schedule as did Memphis.

What I don't understand is comparing the three of us, why we have to to win out to get into the tournament, and you two are already in. We had the most difficult schedule and the second highest NET. Something's not right.

I don’t believe USF is in. I think USF will need to beat Tulsa and get to AAC Championship to really have a good shot at being in. And if they lose the AAC Title to anyone other than FAU the chances get lower

(03-06-2024 01:35 PM)Ocalabull Wrote:  

(03-06-2024 01:05 PM)Memphis Yankee Wrote:  

(03-05-2024 09:52 PM)Sellular1 Wrote:  Can only beat the teams on the schedule. 16-1 in conference is amazing. Quit making excuses

Not making excuses. Trying to point out USF was given the weakest schedule according to preseason predictions. That award usually goes to the team predicted to finish last. USF was predicted to finish 9th. Charlotte played a weak schedule, but it was more difficult than USF's and they were predicted to finish 13th. Why? Is that an excuse or a fact? Is it an excuse or an observation?

Memphis and FAU were given the most difficult schedules and both are two spots lower than their predicted finish based on preseason rankings. That too is a fact.

Every team in the AAC play 5 teams twice, and 8 teams once. USF played the 5 lowest rated teams twice. That's a fact. Memphis and FAU played the highest rated teams twice. Fact. It would have been worse if they could have played themselves twice. lol

You just don't want anyone to point out the facts for discussion. Since you were being a wise guy, lets take it a step farther.

USF (Net 79) had a record of 7-4 OOC. You played 1 P5 team in Florida State State and won. FSU is 15-14, 9th in the ACC.

Memphis (Net 71) played 9 P5 teams going 10-2 with losses to Villanova and Ole Miss. The ACC teams we played and beat are in 3rd and 4th place. Virginia and Clemson. The four teams you lost to were C. Michigan, Maine, Hofstra, and UMass. Our so called bad losses came after losing two of our main players Mills and Brown. The four teams were USF, UAB, Tulane and Rice.

FAU (Net 35) played four P5 teams, Texas A&M, Virginia Tech, Illinois, and Arizona. They were 10-3 with losses to Illinois, Bryant and Florida Gulf Coast. They barely lost anything in the Net with their two bad losses. We were ranked 10th in the country at 15-2, and still only had a Net around 40. Kind of strange, don't you think.

As it stands USF is in the tournament. USF had 4 bad losses to our 2 bad losses. You have a NET of 79 to our NET of 71, and we're not in the tournament. FAU has 2 bad losses like Memphis, a NET of 35 to our 71 even though our overall records are almost the same. 22-8 vs 22-7. They played 4 P5 teams (to USF's 1), and Memphis played 9 P5 teams. FAU is also in the tournament. At least they played a difficult schedule as did Memphis.

What I don't understand is comparing the three of us, why we have to to win out to get into the tournament, and you two are already in. We had the most difficult schedule and the second highest NET. Something's not right.

Well USF beat both FAU and Memphis H2H...

Funny you left that out.

Yes you did, and it's funny that you played us at home after all the distractions started, and we played in the worst crowd of the year because of an ice storm. Our administration told everyone not to go to the game because it was too dangerous.

We still managed to get a 20 point lead on you and pissed it away losing by one point. It triggered a 15 game winning streak for USF. You're welcome : )