RE: The Big East pro rata
Assuming your post is serious, this will not happen for these reasons:
1. East coast schools do not want to add more schools in the midwest - the value for Villanova, Georgetown, St Johns, Providence & UConn is playing in the Boston-DC corridor. Playing Dayton, St Louis, Loyola, etc do not add any value for them & those schools control the conference
2. The schools on your list will be available at anytime to whatever schools are left in the Big East - there is no urgency to add. Let's say that Xavier, Butler, DePaul, Seton Hall & Providence get left behind. Well Dayton, St Louis, Loyola, etc will be very happy to join these schools in a new conference. There is no risk.
3. Big East schools, except for Georgetown, Villanova & UConn, are in a fight for students. Every school elevated to the Big East is a more able competitor for students since the profile is raised. DePaul & Marquette have no desire to raise Loyola's profile, Butler & Xavier don't want to raise Dayton's profile, etc.
4. Big East has a realistic chance to get schools like Boston College, Syracuse, Notre Dame, Pitt, Wake Forest, etc if the ACC implodes. It may be a small chance, but UConn came back & has thrived. If the ACC doesn't work out, Big East Football could be reborn with ND as a non-football member. As long as this could potentially happen, the conference will not expand.
5. Big East schools genuinely like the round robin basketball format with close travel & basketball first schools. While they would change if the $$$ was big, adding the schools you mentioned will not add significant $$ and it would end the round robin. Once you play 1x per year instead of 2x, the conference just isn't as close.
|