(01-19-2024 09:15 AM)IamN2daRockets! Wrote: Thanks Coach....
Can you please write a short return message and explain how Rivals evaluates players and what is general system for doing so? Who covers what region? Is there a std. system used for evaluation, etc. I would certainly find it interesting.
Thanks again.
Go Rockets!
That’s a great question. I’ve asked this myself and haven’t received a clear response. Most of the evaluators at all of the recruiting services do not have any football experience, which is mind boggling to me. As far as Rivals goes, the Midwest analyst for the past couple of years actually did have experience and coached at the college level. Unfortunately, he recently left the company. Many of the 3 star MAC signees were then downgraded to 2 stars after he left. Frustrating as I thought most of the players were absolutely deserving of their 3 star rating.
The prospects that attend Rivals camps will receive ratings and many colleges will actually pay Rivals for camp film. I know the analysts try to see all the prospects in person, and especially the 4 and 5 star players even if they do not attend the camps, but a number of players will be evaluated off film and the offers they hold.
In essence a 2 star at Rivals equals a low 3 star for the other recruiting services. The other services have made a smart business decision in rating darn near every prospect a 3 star. The other services also have site ease of use to their advantage as Rivals system is from the early 2000s. Doesn’t necessarily mean there is more coverage, but there are more features.
I think all sites are barely keeping afloat with the portal ratings as there just doesn’t seem to be enough man power to accurately rate players in a short period of time and we’re seeing a wide range of ratings that don’t always make sense.
I try to make sure the MAC recruits get their due, which is why the Rivals database will always be up to date when it comes to the MAC as compared to the other services. Unfortunately, I have no control over the ratings.