No events in this range is what I keep seeing

(02-14-2022 04:04 PM)gdunn Wrote:  No events in this range is what I keep seeing

Looking like they listened for once. I'd live to be a fly on the wall for those Zoom meetings and phone calls from Friday till today

So who blinked?

(02-14-2022 04:12 PM)gdunn Wrote:  So who blinked?

I feel like if it was us, the schedule would be up.
Truth be told the real staring contest probably just started

(02-14-2022 03:14 PM)slycat Wrote:  

(02-14-2022 03:13 PM)HerdFanGuest Wrote:  

(02-14-2022 03:08 PM)slycat Wrote:  Judy when asked about the schedule release

Her Jeep must've broke down on the way back to the office

I feel I have used every good Jeep fail GIF for her and she isn't even our commish. Just been too easy to dunk.

I know what you mean. I feel like I’ve reached the end of those jeep gifs.

Well, maybe one more:

(02-14-2022 04:18 PM)FrankyP Wrote:  

(02-14-2022 03:14 PM)slycat Wrote:  

(02-14-2022 03:13 PM)HerdFanGuest Wrote:  

(02-14-2022 03:08 PM)slycat Wrote:  Judy when asked about the schedule release

Her Jeep must've broke down on the way back to the office

I feel I have used every good Jeep fail GIF for her and she isn't even our commish. Just been too easy to dunk.

I know what you mean. I feel like I’ve reached the end of those jeep gifs.

Well, maybe one more:

Looks like Judy leaving the office to avoid questions for not releasing the schedule

Where’s the schedule I was promised?! Rawr.

(02-14-2022 04:24 PM)Potomac Wrote:  Where’s the schedule I was promised?! Rawr.

Looks like it was option one, so I guess we'll resume to pointless bickering with rthe new Circus USA stans who have a hard time reading

This should end the Denial phase, Anger phase is next, followed by Bargaining, Depression and finally, Acceptance. They have a long way to go.

(02-14-2022 04:54 PM)APPrising Wrote:  This should end the Denial phase, Anger phase is next, followed by Bargaining, Depression and finally, Acceptance. They have a long way to go.

Lmao I was thinking the other day when we released statements they were going through the 5 stages of grief

(02-14-2022 04:57 PM)HerdFanGuest Wrote:  

(02-14-2022 04:54 PM)APPrising Wrote:  This should end the Denial phase, Anger phase is next, followed by Bargaining, Depression and finally, Acceptance. They have a long way to go.

Lmao I was thinking the other day when we released statements they were going through the 5 stages of grief

If ESPN is getting the schedules this week they better get over it fast.

(02-14-2022 04:57 PM)HerdFanGuest Wrote:  If ESPN is getting the schedules this week they better get over it fast.

They should've gotten over it last year, but Tech and a couple others will still be complaining come the CCG because something something no divisions hurt their chances

The real popcorn moment would be if the SBC scooped CUSA by releasing our schedule with all 14 teams on it before CUSA released their schedule. Of course this is a school issue between Marshall, USM, and ODU with CUSA and not a conference thing between SBC vs CUSA so it wouldn’t happen, but the free entertainment it’d provide would be great.

(02-14-2022 05:12 PM)SkullyMaroo Wrote:  The real popcorn moment would be if the SBC scooped CUSA by releasing our schedule with all 14 teams on it before CUSA released their schedule. Of course this is a school issue between Marshall, USM, and ODU with CUSA and not a conference thing between SBC vs CUSA so it wouldn’t happen, but the free entertainment it’d provide would be great.

You'd have to start charging for the forums at that point lmao
I would like to see one of the Faithful5 leak it someone though, even if it's a month from now when their real schedule is released

Here the kicker for CUSA, we all know that the AAC6 don’t care that the SBC3 left and aren’t going to vote to litigate because it doesn’t nothing for them except drag them into the fight they don’t care about. So with that, can the remaining 5 actually have a legal vote of members to force the issue??? That wouldn’t result in a proper forum that should be required by their bylaws, but I think we have all learned that CUSA bylaws aren’t exactly stellar.

Once you announce you are leaving you no longer have a vote. The Quorum would be for CUSA5. of that you have 3 stuck in CUSA and possibly 2 with eyes on the exits.

(02-14-2022 05:18 PM)Usajags Wrote:  Here the kicker for CUSA, we all know that the AAC6 don’t care that the SBC3 left and aren’t going to vote to litigate because it doesn’t nothing for them except drag them into the fight they don’t care about. So with that, can the remaining 5 actually have a legal vote of members to force the issue??? That wouldn’t result in a proper forum that should be required by their bylaws, but I think we have all learned that CUSA bylaws aren’t exactly stellar.

That's a good question for someone that knows more of the confrence bylaws.
I'd assume 5 would be enough for a vote since that situation it temporary. And I couldn't see more than a couple (WKU in particular) voting against going to litigation though

(02-14-2022 05:24 PM)Soaring Eagle Wrote:  Once you announce you are leaving you no longer have a vote. The Quorum would be for CUSA5. of that you have 3 stuck in CUSA and possibly 2 with eyes on the exits.

Lol. Here’s a news flash: the only ones not looking to bolt are the newbies….and even then I’m sure Lu would be more than happy to scoot if some other conf didn’t come a calling.

(02-14-2022 06:54 PM)FrankyP Wrote:  

(02-14-2022 05:24 PM)Soaring Eagle Wrote:  Once you announce you are leaving you no longer have a vote. The Quorum would be for CUSA5. of that you have 3 stuck in CUSA and possibly 2 with eyes on the exits.

Lol. Here’s a news flash: the only ones not looking to bolt are the newbies….and even then I’m sure Lu would be more than happy to scoot if some other conf didn’t come a calling.

It was like that every year in the Big South. They would say they are looking to upgrade and no one came calling. They took us leaving for the Belt really well. Liberty always wishes for the moon and gets upset when things don’t go their way

(02-14-2022 05:18 PM)Usajags Wrote:  Here the kicker for CUSA, we all know that the AAC6 don’t care that the SBC3 left and aren’t going to vote to litigate because it doesn’t nothing for them except drag them into the fight they don’t care about. So with that, can the remaining 5 actually have a legal vote of members to force the issue??? That wouldn’t result in a proper forum that should be required by their bylaws, but I think we have all learned that CUSA bylaws aren’t exactly stellar.

Most conference bylaws restrict decisions to those that have not announced they are leaving. My guess is that the CUSA is driven by 5 votes now.