(01-23-2022 11:02 PM)Eagle in the gym Wrote:  

(01-23-2022 10:20 PM)CardinalBlackTrojan Wrote:  Curious what CUSA's ultimate response will be if USM, ODU, and Marshall officially bolt early.

Traditionally have back room discussions to divorce. Very few facts become public from the exoduses.

Yes, but you know in messy divorces, the children always suffer the most. We're seeing that play out with Tech fans...

(01-23-2022 11:02 PM)Eagle in the gym Wrote:  

(01-23-2022 10:20 PM)CardinalBlackTrojan Wrote:  Curious what CUSA's ultimate response will be if USM, ODU, and Marshall officially bolt early.

Traditionally have back room discussions to divorce. Very few facts become public from the exoduses.

To that end, the public statement last week from CUSA pretty much confirmed we peace-ing out. If CUSA could and wanted to stop us, they would’ve handled that behind closed doors and the first press release would’ve been about how the 14 of us are committed to seeing things through until Summer ‘23.

(01-24-2022 12:55 AM)HarborPointe Wrote:  

(01-23-2022 11:02 PM)Eagle in the gym Wrote:  

(01-23-2022 10:20 PM)CardinalBlackTrojan Wrote:  Curious what CUSA's ultimate response will be if USM, ODU, and Marshall officially bolt early.

Traditionally have back room discussions to divorce. Very few facts become public from the exoduses.

To that end, the public statement last week from CUSA pretty much confirmed we peace-ing out. If CUSA could and wanted to stop us, they would’ve handled that behind closed doors and the first press release would’ve been about how the 14 of us are committed to seeing things through until Summer ‘23.

The more I've thought about the statement the more I'm thinking it's pretty much saying they hope we all stay but they won't keep us from competing from championships before we leave, nor will they prohibit the other 6 next season.

(01-23-2022 08:10 PM)DoubletapWolf Wrote:  

(01-23-2022 05:34 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  

(01-23-2022 05:23 PM)GaSoEagle Wrote:  Put simply— you don t invite the 4 new ADs unless it has already been decided

I'd do it to Tech...

(01-24-2022 07:59 AM)gdunn Wrote:  

(01-24-2022 12:55 AM)HarborPointe Wrote:  

(01-23-2022 11:02 PM)Eagle in the gym Wrote:  

(01-23-2022 10:20 PM)CardinalBlackTrojan Wrote:  Curious what CUSA's ultimate response will be if USM, ODU, and Marshall officially bolt early.

Traditionally have back room discussions to divorce. Very few facts become public from the exoduses.

To that end, the public statement last week from CUSA pretty much confirmed we peace-ing out. If CUSA could and wanted to stop us, they would’ve handled that behind closed doors and the first press release would’ve been about how the 14 of us are committed to seeing things through until Summer ‘23.

The more I've thought about the statement the more I'm thinking it's pretty much saying they hope we all stay but they won't keep us from competing from championships before we leave, nor will they prohibit the other 6 next season.

I totally agree with this: if they were all staying we would’ve heard from coosa about it by now.

(01-23-2022 05:34 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  

(01-23-2022 05:23 PM)GaSoEagle Wrote:  Put simply— you don t invite the 4 new ADs unless it has already been decided

I'd do it to Tech...

Here it is I've been calling them out for coming over here and stirring things up and you do this.. It's like Beetlejuice... You say it 3 times and they'll be swarming.

Meetings are today and tomorrow.

(01-24-2022 09:09 AM)gdunn Wrote:  

(01-23-2022 05:34 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  

(01-23-2022 05:23 PM)GaSoEagle Wrote:  Put simply— you don t invite the 4 new ADs unless it has already been decided

I'd do it to Tech...

Here it is I've been calling them out for coming over here and stirring things up and you do this.. It's like Beetlejuice... You say it 3 times and they'll be swarming.

LOL. I say let ‘em come. It usually results in them getting banned.

(01-24-2022 10:05 AM)FrankyP Wrote:  

(01-24-2022 09:09 AM)gdunn Wrote:  

(01-23-2022 05:34 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  

(01-23-2022 05:23 PM)GaSoEagle Wrote:  Put simply— you don t invite the 4 new ADs unless it has already been decided

I'd do it to Tech...

Here it is I've been calling them out for coming over here and stirring things up and you do this.. It's like Beetlejuice... You say it 3 times and they'll be swarming.

LOL. I say let ‘em come. It usually results in them getting banned.

Aren’t all 4 of them banned already?

(01-24-2022 10:05 AM)FrankyP Wrote:  

(01-24-2022 09:09 AM)gdunn Wrote:  

(01-23-2022 05:34 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  

(01-23-2022 05:23 PM)GaSoEagle Wrote:  Put simply— you don t invite the 4 new ADs unless it has already been decided

I'd do it to Tech...

Here it is I've been calling them out for coming over here and stirring things up and you do this.. It's like Beetlejuice... You say it 3 times and they'll be swarming.

LOL. I say let ‘em come. It usually results in them getting banned.

Not all of them are bad.. I don't understand why some got their ass on their shoulders..

It's been going like: USM poster posts ABC.

Other posters DEF, GHI.

Tech enters the conversation.. You suck and are deadweight.

USM posters counter.

Tech: Quit picking on me.

(01-24-2022 10:16 AM)APPrising Wrote:  

(01-24-2022 10:05 AM)FrankyP Wrote:  

(01-24-2022 09:09 AM)gdunn Wrote:  

(01-23-2022 05:34 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  

(01-23-2022 05:23 PM)GaSoEagle Wrote:  Put simply— you don t invite the 4 new ADs unless it has already been decided

I'd do it to Tech...

Here it is I've been calling them out for coming over here and stirring things up and you do this.. It's like Beetlejuice... You say it 3 times and they'll be swarming.

LOL. I say let ‘em come. It usually results in them getting banned.

Aren’t all 4 of them banned already?

From winning championships…Yes.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk