(01-21-2022 06:34 PM)YNot Wrote: (01-21-2022 05:28 PM)schmolik Wrote: For those of you who don't care about basketball (which according to my pick contest is everyone here), here's a look back.
Way back in 1996 the WAC made a big splash and expanded to 16 teams, picking off three former SWC to its existing members along with others. They were to my knowledge the first 16 team conference. They lasted three seasons in football before the MWC-WAC split.
In football, teams were split into four four team quads. The teams had played three seasons in the WAC, two in the original divisions and one with the quads shifted before the MWC-WAC split.
Did the quads contribute to the WAC failing? Should they have just stuck to a regular set of two divisions of eight teams each? Back then no one was even considering divisionless alignments. Would the WAC still be together today? It's unlikely that Utah would resist a call from the Pac-12 or BYU, TCU, or Houston from the Big 12 but would the Mountain West exist if the WAC "got it right"? Could the WAC have gotten it right? Were the quads a concept doomed to fail or did the WAC just choose them totally wrong?
Certainly the idea of a 16 team football conference is relevant (or will be) soon after Oklahoma and Texas join the SEC. Should they even bother with quads? Is a 16 team SEC doomed for an inevitable split like the WAC and 16 team Big East eventually did?
CFB teams often only played 11 regular-season games at the time and a 9-game conference schedule wasn't really on the radar. A 9-game WAC schedule would have allowed the legacy WAC schools to play each other more often, while also playing frequently in both California and Texas.
But, with only an 8-game schedule, the 7 legacy schools in the middle hardly played each other...and they felt it. Air Force, Colorado State, and Wyoming on the one side (Quad 2 with UNLV) and BYU, Utah and New Mexico on the other (Quad 3 with UTEP). BYU never had Air Force, Colorado State, or Wyoming on its WAC schedule during the short 16-team WAC lifespan, though we did face Wyoming and Air Force in WAC championship games.
The original 8-team MWC was WAC Quads 2 and 3 minus UTEP plus San Diego State (another legacy member).
I'm excited to see what the 16-team SEC does. I'm certain they will play at least 9 conference games, which should help with more cross-conference scheduling opportunities.
SEC should play without divisions, counting results over two seasons.
3 permanent opponents, the other 12 in groups of six alternating years. The permanent opponents count as a win or loss over the two years, the other games count double.
For
14 teams conferences
3 permanent opponents, the other 10 in groups of five alternating years (8 games)
3 permanent opponents, the other 10 three times over five years (9 games)
4 permanent opponents, the other 9 five times over nine years (9 games)
5 permanent opponents. the other 8 in groups of four alternating years (9 games)
For
12 teams conferences
3 permanent opponents, the other 10 in groups of five alternating years (8 games)
4 permanent opponents, the other 9 five times over nine years (9 games)
5 permanent opponents, the other 6 in groups of three alternating years (8 games)
5 permanent opponents, the other 6, two times over three years (9 games)
Advantages:
(1) No unbalanced divisions (e.g. B1G)
(2) No nonsensical divisions (e.g. ACC)
(3) No contrived divisions (e.g. SEC)
(4) No advantage playing Vanderbilt, Northwestern, Duke, every season.
(5) No disadvantage playing Alabama, Ohio State, etc. every season.