Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Rank the MAC
Author Message
Bookmark and Share
bobcat_backer Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 6,583
Joined: Oct 2005
Reputation: 64
I Root For: OHIO
Location: Westerville, Ohio
Post: #41
RE: Rank the MAC
(01-07-2022 04:14 AM)JSF Wrote:  
(01-07-2022 12:07 AM)Miggy Wrote:  
(01-06-2022 08:27 PM)JSF Wrote:  "Ohio, Ohio, and Ohio." - Tim O'Shea

Ohio averaging 64 ppg in 2 MAC games. As such, it’s hard to project Ohio as the MAC’s best team.

...this guy for real?

lol i know, right? how many points a team scores is his only way to define how good a team is. i mean, doesn't everyone do this?! lol
01-07-2022 09:54 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
NIU007 Online
Legend
*

Posts: 34,249
Joined: Sep 2004
Reputation: 318
I Root For: NIU, MAC
Location: Naperville, IL
Post: #42
RE: Rank the MAC
(01-07-2022 09:45 AM)kreed5120 Wrote:  
(01-07-2022 09:25 AM)NIU007 Wrote:  
(01-07-2022 09:22 AM)kreed5120 Wrote:  
(01-06-2022 06:14 PM)Ken Barna Wrote:  Dear kreed5120,
Your arrogance is showing. First of all, financial situations are always the concern of universities in the MAC, and whether or not a coach should be removed, plays a big part. Also, who is to say whether any coach hired to take over a team, should pass a litmus test as to being the best coach available?

All these teams I named have no problem coming up with money to pay buy outs to underperforming football coaches yet will hang on and extend underperforming basketball coaches. I actually do think EMU did make a decent hire this last go around, but do you sincerely believe over the previous 10 years that EMU was committed to winning MAC basketball? Answer honestly.

I don't remember the last time we bought out a football coach.

You've had such a nice run of success that you haven't needed to.

If we did, we wouldn't have the money to buy them out either.
01-07-2022 10:49 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
NIU007 Online
Legend
*

Posts: 34,249
Joined: Sep 2004
Reputation: 318
I Root For: NIU, MAC
Location: Naperville, IL
Post: #43
RE: Rank the MAC
(01-07-2022 09:50 AM)Ken Barna Wrote:  Dear kreed5120,
The first few years of Coach Murphy's tenure were considered decent, but as time went on it was obvious he was not developing the talent he had, and was scheduling many NAIA teams just to try and get to twenty wins in a season.
Eastern does not have the funds to pay for a buyout and at the same time hire a new coach. That is why Murphy remained coach until his contract expired, or he took another job. I suppose that Eastern would fit your example of commitment, but financially it was out of the question.

That sounds a lot like Montgomery. One year we had 20 wins just because the schedule was really weak. And it seemed like the players didn't develop.
01-07-2022 10:55 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
kreed5120 Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 2,106
Joined: Feb 2016
Reputation: 54
I Root For: Akron
Location:
Post: #44
RE: Rank the MAC
(01-07-2022 09:54 AM)bobcat_backer Wrote:  
(01-07-2022 04:14 AM)JSF Wrote:  
(01-07-2022 12:07 AM)Miggy Wrote:  
(01-06-2022 08:27 PM)JSF Wrote:  "Ohio, Ohio, and Ohio." - Tim O'Shea

Ohio averaging 64 ppg in 2 MAC games. As such, it’s hard to project Ohio as the MAC’s best team.

...this guy for real?

lol i know, right? how many points a team scores is his only way to define how good a team is. i mean, doesn't everyone do this?! lol

I wouldn't pay any attention to what he has said. Ohio isn't a strong offensive team, but that's fine. There is more than 1 way to win a basketball game. Especially in a year where there are no truly great all around teams. His fixation on offense makes no sense as what good is scoring 85 points if you give up 95? Assuming no injuries, Ohio is probably the surest bet to finish with a top 2-3 record in the MAC this year.
01-07-2022 11:13 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
bobcat_backer Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 6,583
Joined: Oct 2005
Reputation: 64
I Root For: OHIO
Location: Westerville, Ohio
Post: #45
RE: Rank the MAC
(01-07-2022 11:13 AM)kreed5120 Wrote:  
(01-07-2022 09:54 AM)bobcat_backer Wrote:  
(01-07-2022 04:14 AM)JSF Wrote:  
(01-07-2022 12:07 AM)Miggy Wrote:  
(01-06-2022 08:27 PM)JSF Wrote:  "Ohio, Ohio, and Ohio." - Tim O'Shea

Ohio averaging 64 ppg in 2 MAC games. As such, it’s hard to project Ohio as the MAC’s best team.

...this guy for real?

lol i know, right? how many points a team scores is his only way to define how good a team is. i mean, doesn't everyone do this?! lol

I wouldn't pay any attention to what he has said. Ohio isn't a strong offensive team, but that's fine. There is more than 1 way to win a basketball game. Especially in a year where there are no truly great all around teams. His fixation on offense makes no sense as what good is scoring 85 points if you give up 95? Assuming no injuries, Ohio is probably the surest bet to finish with a top 2-3 record in the MAC this year.

Agreed. 04-cheers
01-07-2022 11:26 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Miggy Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 2,260
Joined: Aug 2019
Reputation: -4
I Root For: Eastern Michigan and Tem
Location:
Post: #46
RE: Rank the MAC
(01-07-2022 11:26 AM)bobcat_backer Wrote:  
(01-07-2022 11:13 AM)kreed5120 Wrote:  
(01-07-2022 09:54 AM)bobcat_backer Wrote:  
(01-07-2022 04:14 AM)JSF Wrote:  
(01-07-2022 12:07 AM)Miggy Wrote:  Ohio averaging 64 ppg in 2 MAC games. As such, it’s hard to project Ohio as the MAC’s best team.

...this guy for real?

lol i know, right? how many points a team scores is his only way to define how good a team is. i mean, doesn't everyone do this?! lol

I wouldn't pay any attention to what he has said. Ohio isn't a strong offensive team, but that's fine. There is more than 1 way to win a basketball game. Especially in a year where there are no truly great all around teams. His fixation on offense makes no sense as what good is scoring 85 points if you give up 95? Assuming no injuries, Ohio is probably the surest bet to finish with a top 2-3 record in the MAC this year.

Agreed. 04-cheers


To be a top-tier MAC team, Ohio or any other MAC team has to have both a good offense and defense. Since Ohio presently doesn’t, we’ll have to see how that turns out. Most winning teams need a nice scoring margin over their opponents. Hard for that to happen if a team struggles to score points.

Surely, Toledo is one good balanced team. Still remains to be seen if there are good MAC all-round teams.To soon to say others aren’t.

Last season, lots of MAC teams were far better offensively than they were on defense.

Ohio fans should just hope Ohio’s offense improves.
(This post was last modified: 01-07-2022 11:54 AM by Miggy.)
01-07-2022 11:43 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
kreed5120 Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 2,106
Joined: Feb 2016
Reputation: 54
I Root For: Akron
Location:
Post: #47
RE: Rank the MAC
(01-07-2022 10:49 AM)NIU007 Wrote:  
(01-07-2022 09:45 AM)kreed5120 Wrote:  
(01-07-2022 09:25 AM)NIU007 Wrote:  
(01-07-2022 09:22 AM)kreed5120 Wrote:  
(01-06-2022 06:14 PM)Ken Barna Wrote:  Dear kreed5120,
Your arrogance is showing. First of all, financial situations are always the concern of universities in the MAC, and whether or not a coach should be removed, plays a big part. Also, who is to say whether any coach hired to take over a team, should pass a litmus test as to being the best coach available?

All these teams I named have no problem coming up with money to pay buy outs to underperforming football coaches yet will hang on and extend underperforming basketball coaches. I actually do think EMU did make a decent hire this last go around, but do you sincerely believe over the previous 10 years that EMU was committed to winning MAC basketball? Answer honestly.

I don't remember the last time we bought out a football coach.

You've had such a nice run of success that you haven't needed to.

If we did, we wouldn't have the money to buy them out either.

Akrons financial troubles are well publicized. I'm sure if they were able to come up with money to buy out 3 coaches in a 15 year span, NIU could manage to buy out a football coach if the need arose.
01-07-2022 11:46 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Luckeyone Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 5,159
Joined: Jan 2014
Reputation: 35
I Root For: EMU
Location:
Post: #48
RE: Rank the MAC
(01-07-2022 09:22 AM)kreed5120 Wrote:  
(01-06-2022 06:14 PM)Ken Barna Wrote:  Dear kreed5120,
Your arrogance is showing. First of all, financial situations are always the concern of universities in the MAC, and whether or not a coach should be removed, plays a big part. Also, who is to say whether any coach hired to take over a team, should pass a litmus test as to being the best coach available?

All these teams I named have no problem coming up with money to pay buy outs to underperforming football coaches yet will hang on and extend underperforming basketball coaches. I actually do think EMU did make a decent hire this last go around, but do you sincerely believe over the previous 10 years that EMU was committed to winning MAC basketball? Answer honestly.

Hey KReed - an emphatic No!!

For the most part it boils down to the leadership ability of the AD. Some ADs don’t want to rock the boat unless there’s a dumpster fire. Our former AD, specifically, Heather Lyke hired after Murphy was already coach, ruffled feathers at EMU by supplanting a big athletic vision for EMU. I would attribute our new student athletic performance center based on her initiatives. I have it on record that during a season she was going to fire Murphy at it’s conclusion. Unfortunately she got a 3x raise and was hired as Pitts AD. Our current AD has given me a lukewarm feeling but I do believe he made the best hire in Heath.

In addition, EMU has an investment group comprised of wealthy alumni who formed an enterprise called Game Above. I believe they will help EMU get rid of future underperforming coaches (Football, Basketball). Game above has already offered Caleb Williams $1M dollars to play for EMU football.
01-07-2022 11:46 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
NIU007 Online
Legend
*

Posts: 34,249
Joined: Sep 2004
Reputation: 318
I Root For: NIU, MAC
Location: Naperville, IL
Post: #49
RE: Rank the MAC
(01-07-2022 11:46 AM)kreed5120 Wrote:  
(01-07-2022 10:49 AM)NIU007 Wrote:  
(01-07-2022 09:45 AM)kreed5120 Wrote:  
(01-07-2022 09:25 AM)NIU007 Wrote:  
(01-07-2022 09:22 AM)kreed5120 Wrote:  All these teams I named have no problem coming up with money to pay buy outs to underperforming football coaches yet will hang on and extend underperforming basketball coaches. I actually do think EMU did make a decent hire this last go around, but do you sincerely believe over the previous 10 years that EMU was committed to winning MAC basketball? Answer honestly.

I don't remember the last time we bought out a football coach.

You've had such a nice run of success that you haven't needed to.

If we did, we wouldn't have the money to buy them out either.

Akrons financial troubles are well publicized. I'm sure if they were able to come up with money to buy out 3 coaches in a 15 year span, NIU could manage to buy out a football coach if the need arose.

We've been living on the cheap for a while, ever since Illinois' budget impasse a few years ago and a large drop in enrollment, in large part because of that. Still recovering from that. Our AD is a football guy though so we probably concentrate a lot more effort on that, and you may be right.
01-07-2022 12:01 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
kreed5120 Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 2,106
Joined: Feb 2016
Reputation: 54
I Root For: Akron
Location:
Post: #50
RE: Rank the MAC
(01-07-2022 11:46 AM)Luckeyone Wrote:  
(01-07-2022 09:22 AM)kreed5120 Wrote:  
(01-06-2022 06:14 PM)Ken Barna Wrote:  Dear kreed5120,
Your arrogance is showing. First of all, financial situations are always the concern of universities in the MAC, and whether or not a coach should be removed, plays a big part. Also, who is to say whether any coach hired to take over a team, should pass a litmus test as to being the best coach available?

All these teams I named have no problem coming up with money to pay buy outs to underperforming football coaches yet will hang on and extend underperforming basketball coaches. I actually do think EMU did make a decent hire this last go around, but do you sincerely believe over the previous 10 years that EMU was committed to winning MAC basketball? Answer honestly.

Hey KReed - an emphatic No!!

For the most part it boils down to the leadership ability of the AD. Some ADs don’t want to rock the boat unless there’s a dumpster fire. Our former AD, specifically, Heather Lyke hired after Murphy was already coach, ruffled feathers at EMU by supplanting a big athletic vision for EMU. I would attribute our new student athletic performance center based on her initiatives. I have it on record that during a season she was going to fire Murphy at it’s conclusion. Unfortunately she got a 3x raise and was hired as Pitts AD. Our current AD has given me a lukewarm feeling but I do believe he made the best hire in Heath.

In addition, EMU has an investment group comprised of wealthy alumni who formed an enterprise called Game Above. I believe they will help EMU get rid of future underperforming coaches (Football, Basketball). Game above has already offered Caleb Williams $1M dollars to play for EMU football.

I saw that group. It should certainly help moving forward.
01-07-2022 12:48 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Eagle66 Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,422
Joined: Jan 2006
Reputation: 32
I Root For: Ohio
Location: Cleveland, OH
Post: #51
RE: Rank the MAC
(01-07-2022 11:43 AM)Miggy Wrote:  
(01-07-2022 11:26 AM)bobcat_backer Wrote:  
(01-07-2022 11:13 AM)kreed5120 Wrote:  
(01-07-2022 09:54 AM)bobcat_backer Wrote:  
(01-07-2022 04:14 AM)JSF Wrote:  ...this guy for real?

lol i know, right? how many points a team scores is his only way to define how good a team is. i mean, doesn't everyone do this?! lol

I wouldn't pay any attention to what he has said. Ohio isn't a strong offensive team, but that's fine. There is more than 1 way to win a basketball game. Especially in a year where there are no truly great all around teams. His fixation on offense makes no sense as what good is scoring 85 points if you give up 95? Assuming no injuries, Ohio is probably the surest bet to finish with a top 2-3 record in the MAC this year.

Agreed. 04-cheers


To be a top-tier MAC team, Ohio or any other MAC team has to have both a good offense and defense. Since Ohio presently doesn’t, we’ll have to see how that turns out. Most winning teams need a nice scoring margin over their opponents. Hard for that to happen if a team struggles to score points.

Surely, Toledo is one good balanced team. Still remains to be seen if there are good MAC all-round teams.To soon to say others aren’t.

Last season, lots of MAC teams were far better offensively than they were on defense.

Ohio fans should just hope Ohio’s offense improves.

I’ve tried biting my tongue in responding to some of these posts but… oh well…

I think every teams fans should hope for all aspects to improve. However based on previous posts, you have a fixation on points scored, especially without regard for defense or pace. I’ve seen you say well EMU scored 85 against WMU and Ohio only scored 59 so they’ll match up. (And who knows they might if COVID lets them actually play) But then you neglect to mention Ohio held them to 47 while EMU gave up 79. What’s that mean? Not much it’s just one game. I don’t discount EMU could very well end up in the top of the standings, but it seems like just mentioning scoring all the time, is cherry picking the stats a bit. Especially when the sample size for conference play is so small. Heck you even say just above its “To soon to say others aren’t” good all around mac teams… but you’ve been on here constantly saying Ohio isn’t good… ohio isn’t a top 3 team... So which is it? Too early or not?

As for Ohio and their offense…. Bart Torvik’s adjusted offensive efficiency is “tempo free” as he puts it. By his metrics, Ohio is #5 in the mac offensively (133 overall) while his tempo free defense efficiency for Ohio is #1 in the MAC (and 52 overall).

https://barttorvik.com/trank.php?&begin=...ad=5&rpi=#

Long story short, I’ve got other things to worry about besides Ohio’s offense, I’m just enjoying watching them win games right now.


Edits for spelling.
(This post was last modified: 01-07-2022 01:14 PM by Eagle66.)
01-07-2022 01:08 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
bobcat_backer Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 6,583
Joined: Oct 2005
Reputation: 64
I Root For: OHIO
Location: Westerville, Ohio
Post: #52
RE: Rank the MAC
(01-07-2022 01:08 PM)Eagle66 Wrote:  
(01-07-2022 11:43 AM)Miggy Wrote:  
(01-07-2022 11:26 AM)bobcat_backer Wrote:  
(01-07-2022 11:13 AM)kreed5120 Wrote:  
(01-07-2022 09:54 AM)bobcat_backer Wrote:  lol i know, right? how many points a team scores is his only way to define how good a team is. i mean, doesn't everyone do this?! lol

I wouldn't pay any attention to what he has said. Ohio isn't a strong offensive team, but that's fine. There is more than 1 way to win a basketball game. Especially in a year where there are no truly great all around teams. His fixation on offense makes no sense as what good is scoring 85 points if you give up 95? Assuming no injuries, Ohio is probably the surest bet to finish with a top 2-3 record in the MAC this year.

Agreed. 04-cheers


To be a top-tier MAC team, Ohio or any other MAC team has to have both a good offense and defense. Since Ohio presently doesn’t, we’ll have to see how that turns out. Most winning teams need a nice scoring margin over their opponents. Hard for that to happen if a team struggles to score points.

Surely, Toledo is one good balanced team. Still remains to be seen if there are good MAC all-round teams.To soon to say others aren’t.

Last season, lots of MAC teams were far better offensively than they were on defense.

Ohio fans should just hope Ohio’s offense improves.

I’ve tried biting my tongue in responding to some of these posts but… oh well…

I think every teams fans should hope for all aspects to improve. However based on previous posts, you have a fixation on points scored, especially without regard for defense or pace. I’ve seen you say well EMU scored 85 against WMU and Ohio only scored 59 so they’ll match up. (And who knows they might if COVID lets them actually play) But then you neglect to mention Ohio held them to 47 while EMU gave up 79. What’s that mean? Not much it’s just one game. I don’t discount EMU could very well end up in the top of the standings, but it seems like just mentioning scoring all the time, is cherry picking the stats a bit. Especially when the sample size for conference play is so small. Heck you even say just above its “To soon to say others aren’t” good all around mac teams… but you’ve been on here constantly saying Ohio isn’t good… ohio isn’t a top 3 team... So which is it? Too early or not?

As for Ohio and their offense…. Bart Torvik’s adjusted offensive efficiency is “tempo free” as he puts it. By his metrics, Ohio is #5 in the mac offensively (133 overall) while his tempo free defense efficiency for Ohio is #1 in the MAC (and 52 overall).

https://barttorvik.com/trank.php?&begin=...ad=5&rpi=#

Long story short, I’ve got other things to worry about besides Ohio’s offense, I’m just enjoying watching them win games right now.


Edits for spelling.

04-bow
01-07-2022 01:38 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Miggy Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 2,260
Joined: Aug 2019
Reputation: -4
I Root For: Eastern Michigan and Tem
Location:
Post: #53
RE: Rank the MAC
(01-07-2022 01:38 PM)bobcat_backer Wrote:  
(01-07-2022 01:08 PM)Eagle66 Wrote:  
(01-07-2022 11:43 AM)Miggy Wrote:  
(01-07-2022 11:26 AM)bobcat_backer Wrote:  
(01-07-2022 11:13 AM)kreed5120 Wrote:  I wouldn't pay any attention to what he has said. Ohio isn't a strong offensive team, but that's fine. There is more than 1 way to win a basketball game. Especially in a year where there are no truly great all around teams. His fixation on offense makes no sense as what good is scoring 85 points if you give up 95? Assuming no injuries, Ohio is probably the surest bet to finish with a top 2-3 record in the MAC this year.

Agreed. 04-cheers


To be a top-tier MAC team, Ohio or any other MAC team has to have both a good offense and defense. Since Ohio presently doesn’t, we’ll have to see how that turns out. Most winning teams need a nice scoring margin over their opponents. Hard for that to happen if a team struggles to score points.

Surely, Toledo is one good balanced team. Still remains to be seen if there are good MAC all-round teams.To soon to say others aren’t.

Last season, lots of MAC teams were far better offensively than they were on defense.

Ohio fans should just hope Ohio’s offense improves.

I’ve tried biting my tongue in responding to some of these posts but… oh well…

I think every teams fans should hope for all aspects to improve. However based on previous posts, you have a fixation on points scored, especially without regard for defense or pace. I’ve seen you say well EMU scored 85 against WMU and Ohio only scored 59 so they’ll match up. (And who knows they might if COVID lets them actually play) But then you neglect to mention Ohio held them to 47 while EMU gave up 79. What’s that mean? Not much it’s just one game. I don’t discount EMU could very well end up in the top of the standings, but it seems like just mentioning scoring all the time, is cherry picking the stats a bit. Especially when the sample size for conference play is so small. Heck you even say just above its “To soon to say others aren’t” good all around mac teams… but you’ve been on here constantly saying Ohio isn’t good… ohio isn’t a top 3 team... So which is it? Too early or not?

As for Ohio and their offense…. Bart Torvik’s adjusted offensive efficiency is “tempo free” as he puts it. By his metrics, Ohio is #5 in the mac offensively (133 overall) while his tempo free defense efficiency for Ohio is #1 in the MAC (and 52 overall).

https://barttorvik.com/trank.php?&begin=...ad=5&rpi=#

Long story short, I’ve got other things to worry about besides Ohio’s offense, I’m just enjoying watching them win games right now.


Edits for spelling.

04-bow

I didn’t cherry-pick discussing the WMU game, I discussed EMU’s offense playing WMU that was far better than Ohio’s offense playing WMU as EMU scored 85 points and Ohio just 59-points against a common opponent. But now I’ll address address EMU’s defense in that game since you raise it
as an issue.

As background, in EMU’s three prior games, EMU had shown it’s defense was good as it held it’s opponents to scoring in each game less than 60 points in regulation. It did so without forcing opponent turnovers and did so in large part because Nate Scott was very effective defending the rim.


Nate Scott did not play in the WNU game, in his absence, EMU adjusted their defense In the first half, and EMU forced many turnovers that held WMU to scoring but 30-points. At the same time EMU scored 47 points, and led WMU, 47-30, a 17-point margin at the half. Ohio only led WMU 28-24 at the end of the first-half.

In the second half, EMU did not try to force turnovers and stopped doing other things that resulted in WMU scoring 79 points.

So, I’m not concerned about EMU’s defense.

As for it’s offense, EMU scoring 85 points was a break-out game for their offense. They played far differently in it’s offensive and defensive schemes schemes in the WMU game. That gives me some confidence going forward in EMU’s capability to both score points and limit opponents scoring.

Massey ranks Ohio’s offense 169th among DIv 1 teams in the nation. Ohio averaging 64 points in it’s first two MAC games is not good.

I’m glad at least some Ohio fans realize Ohio’s offense is suspect. Hope Ohio fans realize that relying solely on their defense might not lead to success in MAC play.
(This post was last modified: 01-07-2022 04:32 PM by Miggy.)
01-07-2022 04:13 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
bobcat_backer Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 6,583
Joined: Oct 2005
Reputation: 64
I Root For: OHIO
Location: Westerville, Ohio
Post: #54
RE: Rank the MAC
(01-07-2022 04:13 PM)Miggy Wrote:  
(01-07-2022 01:38 PM)bobcat_backer Wrote:  
(01-07-2022 01:08 PM)Eagle66 Wrote:  
(01-07-2022 11:43 AM)Miggy Wrote:  
(01-07-2022 11:26 AM)bobcat_backer Wrote:  Agreed. 04-cheers


To be a top-tier MAC team, Ohio or any other MAC team has to have both a good offense and defense. Since Ohio presently doesn’t, we’ll have to see how that turns out. Most winning teams need a nice scoring margin over their opponents. Hard for that to happen if a team struggles to score points.

Surely, Toledo is one good balanced team. Still remains to be seen if there are good MAC all-round teams.To soon to say others aren’t.

Last season, lots of MAC teams were far better offensively than they were on defense.

Ohio fans should just hope Ohio’s offense improves.

I’ve tried biting my tongue in responding to some of these posts but… oh well…

I think every teams fans should hope for all aspects to improve. However based on previous posts, you have a fixation on points scored, especially without regard for defense or pace. I’ve seen you say well EMU scored 85 against WMU and Ohio only scored 59 so they’ll match up. (And who knows they might if COVID lets them actually play) But then you neglect to mention Ohio held them to 47 while EMU gave up 79. What’s that mean? Not much it’s just one game. I don’t discount EMU could very well end up in the top of the standings, but it seems like just mentioning scoring all the time, is cherry picking the stats a bit. Especially when the sample size for conference play is so small. Heck you even say just above its “To soon to say others aren’t” good all around mac teams… but you’ve been on here constantly saying Ohio isn’t good… ohio isn’t a top 3 team... So which is it? Too early or not?

As for Ohio and their offense…. Bart Torvik’s adjusted offensive efficiency is “tempo free” as he puts it. By his metrics, Ohio is #5 in the mac offensively (133 overall) while his tempo free defense efficiency for Ohio is #1 in the MAC (and 52 overall).

https://barttorvik.com/trank.php?&begin=...ad=5&rpi=#

Long story short, I’ve got other things to worry about besides Ohio’s offense, I’m just enjoying watching them win games right now.


Edits for spelling.

04-bow

I didn’t cherry-pick discussing the WMU game, I discussed EMU’s offense playing WMU that was far better than Ohio’s offense playing WMU as EMU scored 85 points and Ohio just 59-points against a common opponent. But now I’ll address address EMU’s defense in that game since you raise it
as an issue.

As background, in EMU’s three prior games, EMU had shown it’s defense was good as it held it’s opponents to scoring in each game less than 60 points in regulation. It did so without forcing opponent turnovers and did so in large part because Nate Scott was very effective defending the rim.


Nate Scott did not play in the WNU game, in his absence, EMU adjusted their defense In the first half, and EMU forced many turnovers that held WMU to scoring but 30-points. At the same time EMU scored 47 points, and led WMU, 47-30, a 17-point margin at the half. Ohio only led WMU 28-24 at the end of the first-half.

In the second half, EMU did not try to force turnovers and stopped doing other things that resulted in WMU scoring 79 points.

So, I’m not concerned about EMU’s defense.

As for it’s offense, EMU scoring 85 points was a break-out game for their offense. They played far differently in it’s offensive and defensive schemes schemes in the WMU game. That gives me some confidence going forward in EMU’s capability to both score points and limit opponents scoring.

Massey ranks Ohio’s offense 169th among DIv 1 teams in the nation. Ohio averaging 64 points in it’s first two MAC games is not good.

I’m glad at least some Ohio fans realize Ohio’s offense is suspect. Hope Ohio fans realize that relying solely on their defense might not lead to success in MAC play.

So, is scoring 80 points against a team that gives up only 62.5 points per game enough for you to say maybe we're in the top half of the MAC this year? 03-lmfao
01-07-2022 08:40 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.