The Communists are in charge. We needed a purge in the 50's.

I would advise conservative parents to quit attending any school board meetings since it will be a trap. Anything you protest will result in an arrest since the FBI agents observing it will deem it to be "intimidating" or "harassing". Not worth it. Garland is on a HUGE power trip; he wants constant revenge for NOT being selected to the Supreme Court (thank God). Resist giving him the satisfaction of having conservative and concerned parents arrested.

The better tactic is to coordinate with like minded parents and start a homeschool effort in your neighborhood. The vast majority of public schools are going to the dogs anyway; just walk away. Let them collapse into chaos. Your taxes will still support that BULLS HIT but that's life.

(10-04-2021 07:22 PM)boss man Wrote:  Garland is on a HUGE power trip; he wants constant revenge for NOT being selected to the Supreme Court (thank God).

God knows, Mitch McConnell has made some mistakes (and worse) over the 79 years of his life. But the Garland nomination to the US Supreme Court was, by several orders of magnitude, the most consequential test of his abilities as a Senator. I honestly believe that if McConnell had failed that test, this country would have been cursed not only with “Justice Garland” but also with “President Clinton.” Those were the stakes. And McConnell passed with flying colors.

A US Senator can be harassed but a school board funded by tax dollars can’t be questioned by those who pay the taxes.

(10-04-2021 09:23 PM)gdunn Wrote:  A US Senator can be harassed but a school board funded by tax dollars can’t be questioned by those who pay the taxes.

Well, duh! Sinema is not supporting the vegetable's nation-bankrupting $3.5T socialist agenda so it's fair game to harass her. On the flip side, if you speak out against socialist indoctrination and "whitey bad, black man superior" then you are now labeled an extremist by the FBI.

It says right in the front they are going after threats. In what world do you guys think threatening a public official is OK?

There have been videos of people following school board members out after mask related meetings shouting "I know where you live".

Not sure how you decided it was about CRT.

(10-04-2021 09:46 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  It says right in the front they are going after threats. In what world do you guys think threatening a public official is OK?

There have been videos of people following school board members out after mask related meetings shouting "I know where you live".

Not sure how you decided it was about CRT.

Ok thats one example of a "threat" at a single meeting.

Keep going...lets see more... you know... to the level that the AG of the United States has to put this out there like a dope.

This is 100% a threat from the feds to put down any political dissent. Period.


Sent from my SM-N975U using Tapatalk

(10-04-2021 09:46 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  It says right in the front they are going after threats. In what world do you guys think threatening a public official is OK?

There have been videos of people following school board members out after mask related meetings shouting "I know where you live".

Not sure how you decided it was about CRT.

"Or efforts to intimidate." That's a very broad brush, which is the concern here. It seems quite okay for people to publicly harass politicians or make threats of harm to them IF they are politicians on a certain side of the aisle. It's okay for some people to be doxxed and threatened if that person isn't part of a particular narrative. But if you speak out against a school board pushing racism, now the FBI is involved? And you think the Feds jumping in when average Joe says something to his local school board member is okay?

(10-04-2021 09:46 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  It says right in the front they are going after threats. In what world do you guys think threatening a public official is OK?

There have been videos of people following school board members out after mask related meetings shouting "I know where you live".

Not sure how you decided it was about CRT.

People were at Kavanaugh house. Intimidated and harassed (as the letter state is a issue) Sinema just yesterday and did the same to Rand Paul last year as he was walking with his wife in DC but none of these have drawn a investigation. Why?

(10-04-2021 07:58 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:  

(10-04-2021 07:22 PM)boss man Wrote:  Garland is on a HUGE power trip; he wants constant revenge for NOT being selected to the Supreme Court (thank God).

God knows, Mitch McConnell has made some mistakes (and worse) over the 79 years of his life. But the Garland nomination to the US Supreme Court was, by several orders of magnitude, the most consequential test of his abilities as a Senator. I honestly believe that if McConnell had failed that test, this country would have been cursed not only with “Justice Garland” but also with “President Clinton.” Those were the stakes. And McConnell passed with flying colors.

Sshtop, just stop.

Merrick garlyn was the moderate.

Nothing to worry about here, no gulags for intransigent tourists, that’d never happen…

Like or hate the Yertle, and there’s a reservoir for both, this was a complete home run.

This is straight up Gestapo stuff right here folks. Use the federal police to silence and intimidate opposition.


Do not even begin to give me the asinine threat argument. There are plenty of laws to cover that already.

Garland is a pos, plain and simple.

(10-04-2021 09:46 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  It says right in the front they are going after threats. In what world do you guys think threatening a public official is OK?

There have been videos of people following school board members out after mask related meetings shouting "I know where you live".

Not sure how you decided it was about CRT.

Do those threats include following folks into the bathroom? Just wondering.

(10-04-2021 09:46 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  It says right in the front they are going after threats. In what world do you guys think threatening a public official is OK?

There have been videos of people following school board members out after mask related meetings shouting "I know where you live".

Not sure how you decided it was about CRT.

Post those videos. I haven't seen one yet like that. Cite your sources or sit down and shut up.

And who gets to decide what a threat is? You? The school board? The FBI? In all the videos of school board meetings I've watched the meeting only descended into potential violence when one of the school board members went off on a parent questioning his authority. He went so far as to invite the man outside. I'm sure you've seen it.

And get your head out of your ass. I'd bet almost every single incident involved the teaching of CRT and parental opposition. These parents aren't suddenly showing up to previously unattended meetings because their kids are being fed crap lunches.

But spin away, no one here except your communist buddies believes you anyway. Is there any topic on which you won't immediately go into spin mode?

(10-04-2021 09:52 PM)maximus Wrote:  

(10-04-2021 09:46 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  It says right in the front they are going after threats. In what world do you guys think threatening a public official is OK?

There have been videos of people following school board members out after mask related meetings shouting "I know where you live".

Not sure how you decided it was about CRT.

Ok thats one example of a "threat" at a single meeting.

Keep going...lets see more... you know... to the level that the AG of the United States has to put this out there like a dope.

This is 100% a threat from the feds to put down any political dissent. Period.


Sent from my SM-N975U using Tapatalk

(10-04-2021 11:05 PM)shere khan Wrote:  This is straight up Gestapo stuff right here folks. Use the federal police to silence and intimidate opposition.


Do not even begin to give me the asinine threat argument. There are plenty of laws to cover that already.

Garland is a pos, plain and simple.

Yeah but they are so last century and weren't written by Garland. He needs something with his imprimatur on it to make his presence felt.

where's that thread about Civil War 2? This is the sort of thing that pushes us a little closer to it.

“While spirited debate about policy matters is protected under our Constitution, that protection does not extend to threats of violence or efforts to intimidate individuals based on their views.”

Liberals are tone deaf.

Black Lives Matter and their Antifa lap dogs attacked innocent people, destroyed businesses and public property for months. None have been prosecuted.

Garland proving everyday why he lacks the intestinal fortitude to sit on the SCOTUS. He is nothing more than a puppet of the socialists.

https://twitter.com/TheAmishDude/status/...99361?s=19

Sent from my SM-N975U using Tapatalk

(10-05-2021 07:33 AM)CardinalJim Wrote:  “While spirited debate about policy matters is protected under our Constitution, that protection does not extend to threats of violence or efforts to intimidate individuals based on their views.”

Liberals are tone deaf.

Black Lives Matter and their Antifa lap dogs attacked innocent people, destroyed businesses and public property for months. None have been prosecuted.

Garland proving everyday why he lacks the intestinal fortitude to sit on the SCOTUS. He is nothing more than a puppet of the socialists.

Uh, excuse me, CNN said that those were fiery, but mostly peaceful protests! They would NEVER lie to the public!

But yeah, when one side incites violence or actually perpetuates violence against innocent civilians, certain politicians, the police, etc. it's perfectly fine. When the other side even makes a veiled threat the feds step in to investigate? Something is seriously off with this.