Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)


Post Reply 
Belt Better Off No Matter What?
Author Message
Bookmark and Share
Georgia_Power_Company Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,481
Joined: Oct 2013
Reputation: 122
I Root For: GA Southern
Location: Statesboro GA
Post: #101
RE: Belt Better Off No Matter What?
The Sun Belt has risen based on performance. I really don't want to add any schools that aren't committed to at least trying to compete in the Sun Belt. Rice just doesn't say "winner" to me. UTSA has much more potential to be a real long term solid program IMHO.
09-21-2021 08:51 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
ericsaid Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 9,233
Joined: May 2013
Reputation: 227
I Root For: App. State/ECU
Location: High Point, NC
Post: #102
RE: Belt Better Off No Matter What?
(09-21-2021 08:51 AM)Georgia_Power_Company Wrote:  The Sun Belt has risen based on performance. I really don't want to add any schools that aren't committed to at least trying to compete in the Sun Belt. Rice just doesn't say "winner" to me. UTSA has much more potential to be a real long term solid program IMHO.

Would love to have ECU (not happening but they are a cultural fit with football and baseball taking the cake), Marshall, USM, and UTSA.

Adding ECU, Marshall, and USM would immediately add like seven rivalry games to the schedule for the Sun Belt and would help Gill in selling the Sun Belt to ESPN advertisers.

UTSA would be a long-term add, but it would be cool to see some of the eastern Sun Belt schools recruit Texas, or at least leverage our visibility there for something positive.
09-21-2021 09:13 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Troy_Fan_15 Offline
Sun Belt Apologist
*

Posts: 4,910
Joined: Dec 2016
Reputation: 286
I Root For: Troy Trojans
Location:
Post: #103
RE: Belt Better Off No Matter What?
I just don’t see the reality of Rice joining the Sun Belt nor their fans wanting that move.
09-21-2021 09:15 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
APPdiesel Offline
All American
*

Posts: 2,564
Joined: Sep 2015
Reputation: 334
I Root For: App State
Location: Greenville, SC
Post: #104
Belt Better Off No Matter What?
I don’t like the thought of adding a bad football program to comfort another bad football program.

No to Rice.
(This post was last modified: 09-21-2021 09:32 AM by APPdiesel.)
09-21-2021 09:31 AM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
slycat Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 8,697
Joined: Apr 2012
Reputation: 568
I Root For: Texas State
Location: Manvel, TX
Post: #105
RE: Belt Better Off No Matter What?
Rice only makes the move out of desperation.

They will likely stay with whatever is left of CUSA. Seeing it looks like CUSA may lose up four they may just sit at ten. And if Marshall stays then they just need to add one. It would be interesting to see in JMU would want CUSA or SBC in that situation.

UAB (AAC)
UTSA (AAC)
USM (SBC)
Marshall (SBC)

Of course if MWC takes two from CUSA, then it gets interesting.
09-21-2021 09:31 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
GoBigRed26 Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 2,074
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation: 130
I Root For: stAte
Location: Little Rock, AR
Post: #106
RE: Belt Better Off No Matter What?
(09-21-2021 05:29 AM)rokamortis Wrote:  If they don’t go AAC or MWC, would we consider recruiting Rice to the SBC as a travel partner for TX State? Would they have any interest?

If the main reason we haven't been interested in Liberty is that they are a private school while all our current members are public Universities, we should stay consistent with that and look at UTSA or UNT before Rice.
09-21-2021 09:36 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
arkstfan Away
Sorry folks
*

Posts: 25,907
Joined: Feb 2004
Reputation: 997
I Root For: Fresh Starts
Location:
Post: #107
RE: Belt Better Off No Matter What?
(09-21-2021 08:51 AM)Georgia_Power_Company Wrote:  The Sun Belt has risen based on performance. I really don't want to add any schools that aren't committed to at least trying to compete in the Sun Belt. Rice just doesn't say "winner" to me. UTSA has much more potential to be a real long term solid program IMHO.

Rice makes the presidents happy. The presidents approve the athletic budget and vote on membership so I’m fine with making them happy.

Personally I’m fine with any two out of Marshall, FAU, WKU, USM and probably can be convinced others are acceptable
09-21-2021 10:44 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
RamblinRedWolf Offline
All American
*

Posts: 2,599
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation: 87
I Root For: Arkansas State
Location:
Post: #108
RE: Belt Better Off No Matter What?
(09-21-2021 10:44 AM)arkstfan Wrote:  
(09-21-2021 08:51 AM)Georgia_Power_Company Wrote:  The Sun Belt has risen based on performance. I really don't want to add any schools that aren't committed to at least trying to compete in the Sun Belt. Rice just doesn't say "winner" to me. UTSA has much more potential to be a real long term solid program IMHO.

Rice makes the presidents happy. The presidents approve the athletic budget and vote on membership so I’m fine with making them happy.

Personally I’m fine with any two out of Marshall, FAU, WKU, USM and probably can be convinced others are acceptable

My understanding is WKU/MTSU are attached at the hip (isn't that part of the reason why WKU got into CUSA was because of the Raiders wanting them in the league with them?)
09-21-2021 10:50 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
THUNDERStruck73 Offline
Complete Jackass
*

Posts: 13,166
Joined: Feb 2012
Reputation: 981
I Root For: Herd, Our Lady, & Heels
Location: Huntington, WV
Post: #109
RE: Belt Better Off No Matter What?
(09-21-2021 10:50 AM)RamblinRedWolf Wrote:  
(09-21-2021 10:44 AM)arkstfan Wrote:  
(09-21-2021 08:51 AM)Georgia_Power_Company Wrote:  The Sun Belt has risen based on performance. I really don't want to add any schools that aren't committed to at least trying to compete in the Sun Belt. Rice just doesn't say "winner" to me. UTSA has much more potential to be a real long term solid program IMHO.

Rice makes the presidents happy. The presidents approve the athletic budget and vote on membership so I’m fine with making them happy.

Personally I’m fine with any two out of Marshall, FAU, WKU, USM and probably can be convinced others are acceptable

My understanding is WKU/MTSU are attached at the hip (isn't that part of the reason why WKU got into CUSA was because of the Raiders wanting them in the league with them?)

WKU was the last school added due in part to MTSU and Marshall in trying to even out the divisions. The west was already set with UTSA, UNT, and LaTech all joining in 2013 to add to Rice, UTEP, and USM, and UAB

ECU, Tulane, and Tulsa left in after the 2013 season, so CUSA needed to add two east division schools because USM was shifting to the west and the Tulane replacement was also going to be in the west as well.
09-21-2021 08:51 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
arkstfan Away
Sorry folks
*

Posts: 25,907
Joined: Feb 2004
Reputation: 997
I Root For: Fresh Starts
Location:
Post: #110
RE: Belt Better Off No Matter What?
(09-21-2021 10:50 AM)RamblinRedWolf Wrote:  
(09-21-2021 10:44 AM)arkstfan Wrote:  
(09-21-2021 08:51 AM)Georgia_Power_Company Wrote:  The Sun Belt has risen based on performance. I really don't want to add any schools that aren't committed to at least trying to compete in the Sun Belt. Rice just doesn't say "winner" to me. UTSA has much more potential to be a real long term solid program IMHO.

Rice makes the presidents happy. The presidents approve the athletic budget and vote on membership so I’m fine with making them happy.

Personally I’m fine with any two out of Marshall, FAU, WKU, USM and probably can be convinced others are acceptable

My understanding is WKU/MTSU are attached at the hip (isn't that part of the reason why WKU got into CUSA was because of the Raiders wanting them in the league with them?)

Not true, MTSU dashed out the door without WKU and WKU would still be here if Tulsa hadn’t gotten an invite to AAC.
09-21-2021 09:12 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
deb025 Offline
Banned

Posts: 2,098
Joined: Aug 2015
I Root For: Louisiana Tech
Location:
Post: #111
RE: Belt Better Off No Matter What?
(09-21-2021 09:12 PM)arkstfan Wrote:  
(09-21-2021 10:50 AM)RamblinRedWolf Wrote:  
(09-21-2021 10:44 AM)arkstfan Wrote:  
(09-21-2021 08:51 AM)Georgia_Power_Company Wrote:  The Sun Belt has risen based on performance. I really don't want to add any schools that aren't committed to at least trying to compete in the Sun Belt. Rice just doesn't say "winner" to me. UTSA has much more potential to be a real long term solid program IMHO.

Rice makes the presidents happy. The presidents approve the athletic budget and vote on membership so I’m fine with making them happy.

Personally I’m fine with any two out of Marshall, FAU, WKU, USM and probably can be convinced others are acceptable

My understanding is WKU/MTSU are attached at the hip (isn't that part of the reason why WKU got into CUSA was because of the Raiders wanting them in the league with them?)

Not true, MTSU dashed out the door without WKU and WKU would still be here if Tulsa hadn’t gotten an invite to AAC.

Thank God for WKU that happened and they joined CUSA. Much better basketball conference imo. Gone are the days of WKU dominating the Sunbelt in men's basketball. They actually play in a decent league now. Iron sharpens Iron.
09-21-2021 09:22 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
arkstfan Away
Sorry folks
*

Posts: 25,907
Joined: Feb 2004
Reputation: 997
I Root For: Fresh Starts
Location:
Post: #112
RE: Belt Better Off No Matter What?
(09-21-2021 09:22 PM)deb025 Wrote:  
(09-21-2021 09:12 PM)arkstfan Wrote:  
(09-21-2021 10:50 AM)RamblinRedWolf Wrote:  
(09-21-2021 10:44 AM)arkstfan Wrote:  
(09-21-2021 08:51 AM)Georgia_Power_Company Wrote:  The Sun Belt has risen based on performance. I really don't want to add any schools that aren't committed to at least trying to compete in the Sun Belt. Rice just doesn't say "winner" to me. UTSA has much more potential to be a real long term solid program IMHO.

Rice makes the presidents happy. The presidents approve the athletic budget and vote on membership so I’m fine with making them happy.

Personally I’m fine with any two out of Marshall, FAU, WKU, USM and probably can be convinced others are acceptable

My understanding is WKU/MTSU are attached at the hip (isn't that part of the reason why WKU got into CUSA was because of the Raiders wanting them in the league with them?)

Not true, MTSU dashed out the door without WKU and WKU would still be here if Tulsa hadn’t gotten an invite to AAC.

Thank God for WKU that happened and they joined CUSA. Much better basketball conference imo. Gone are the days of WKU dominating the Sunbelt in men's basketball. They actually play in a decent league now. Iron sharpens Iron.

Sun Belt has had an at-large bid since the last time CUSA did. Might want to work on knocking off the rust.
09-21-2021 10:04 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
chiefsfan Offline
No Seriously, they let me be a mod
*

Posts: 43,763
Joined: Sep 2007
Reputation: 1066
I Root For: ASU
Location:
Post: #113
RE: Belt Better Off No Matter What?
(09-21-2021 09:12 PM)arkstfan Wrote:  
(09-21-2021 10:50 AM)RamblinRedWolf Wrote:  
(09-21-2021 10:44 AM)arkstfan Wrote:  
(09-21-2021 08:51 AM)Georgia_Power_Company Wrote:  The Sun Belt has risen based on performance. I really don't want to add any schools that aren't committed to at least trying to compete in the Sun Belt. Rice just doesn't say "winner" to me. UTSA has much more potential to be a real long term solid program IMHO.

Rice makes the presidents happy. The presidents approve the athletic budget and vote on membership so I’m fine with making them happy.

Personally I’m fine with any two out of Marshall, FAU, WKU, USM and probably can be convinced others are acceptable

My understanding is WKU/MTSU are attached at the hip (isn't that part of the reason why WKU got into CUSA was because of the Raiders wanting them in the league with them?)

Not true, MTSU dashed out the door without WKU and WKU would still be here if Tulsa hadn’t gotten an invite to AAC.

And make no mistake, WKU would gladly return the favor
09-21-2021 10:07 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
FrankyP Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,187
Joined: Jun 2019
Reputation: 386
I Root For: UL Ragin Cajuns
Location:
Post: #114
RE: Belt Better Off No Matter What?
(09-21-2021 10:04 PM)arkstfan Wrote:  
(09-21-2021 09:22 PM)deb025 Wrote:  
(09-21-2021 09:12 PM)arkstfan Wrote:  
(09-21-2021 10:50 AM)RamblinRedWolf Wrote:  
(09-21-2021 10:44 AM)arkstfan Wrote:  Rice makes the presidents happy. The presidents approve the athletic budget and vote on membership so I’m fine with making them happy.

Personally I’m fine with any two out of Marshall, FAU, WKU, USM and probably can be convinced others are acceptable

My understanding is WKU/MTSU are attached at the hip (isn't that part of the reason why WKU got into CUSA was because of the Raiders wanting them in the league with them?)

Not true, MTSU dashed out the door without WKU and WKU would still be here if Tulsa hadn’t gotten an invite to AAC.

Thank God for WKU that happened and they joined CUSA. Much better basketball conference imo. Gone are the days of WKU dominating the Sunbelt in men's basketball. They actually play in a decent league now. Iron sharpens Iron.

Sun Belt has had an at-large bid since the last time CUSA did. Might want to work on knocking off the rust.


LOL at a laturd poster bragging about basketball when it’s been 31 years since the last time they went dancing. Yeah, not since 1991. To put it in perspective here are just a few things that also happened in 1991:

—-Mikhail Gorbachev resigns as president of the Soviet Union and the Soviet Union officially ceases to exist

—-Rodney King video surfaces

—-Jeffrey Dahmer is arrested

—-Operation Desert Storm is happening.

Yep. Old Deb knows basketball.

Next they’ll try to say they have a better media deal.

03-thumbsup
(This post was last modified: 09-22-2021 05:16 AM by FrankyP.)
09-22-2021 05:13 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.