Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Dismal non-conference year versus tourney teams
Author Message
Bookmark and Share
Todor Online
Heisman
*

Posts: 8,645
Joined: Jan 2019
Reputation: 914
I Root For: New Mexico State
Location:
Post: #1
Dismal non-conference year versus tourney teams
WAC versus the Sweet 16--
Dixie State lost to Gonzaga 112-67
Cal Bap lost to USC 97-87 in OT
Seattle lost to UCLA 78-52
Chicago lost to Loyola 88-51

WAC vs other tournament teams--
GCU lost to Colorado 74-64
UVU lost to BYU 82-60
RGV lost to Texas 91-55
Tarleton lost to Abilene 69-48
Chicago lost to Illinois 97-38
Chicago lost to Ohio 84-61
Chicago lost to Drake 111-67

04-cheers To better days.
(This post was last modified: 03-23-2021 04:29 AM by Todor.)
03-23-2021 04:28 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


DoubleRSU Offline
All American

Posts: 3,780
Joined: Aug 2015
I Root For: Seattle U
Location:
Post: #2
RE: Dismal non-conference year versus tourney teams
You can excuse Dixie and Tarleton off that list because it was their first transition year. We can wipe Chicago State off since that’s what we expect from them.

Definitely not great, but not too bad either.
03-23-2021 12:40 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
FirstandGoal Offline
2nd String
*

Posts: 405
Joined: Jan 2021
Reputation: 10
I Root For: Lamar
Location:
Post: #3
RE: Dismal non-conference year versus tourney teams
Only thing this really shows is the power conferences have better basketball programs overall and low to mid programs will play them for a payday.
03-23-2021 12:48 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


Todor Online
Heisman
*

Posts: 8,645
Joined: Jan 2019
Reputation: 914
I Root For: New Mexico State
Location:
Post: #4
RE: Dismal non-conference year versus tourney teams
(03-23-2021 12:40 PM)DoubleRSU Wrote:  You can excuse Dixie and Tarleton off that list because it was their first transition year. We can wipe Chicago State off since that’s what we expect from them.

Definitely not great, but not too bad either.

It wasn't meant as a name and shame. Just our games versus teams that made the tournament.

Incidentally, Portland, who Seattle beat, beat Oregon State. Just a side bar of no real consequence, something I noticed.

Other side note, NMSU's 1 D1 non con game was not a tournament team. Otherwise, I believe everyone else had at least one.
03-23-2021 01:00 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
DoubleRSU Offline
All American

Posts: 3,780
Joined: Aug 2015
I Root For: Seattle U
Location:
Post: #5
RE: Dismal non-conference year versus tourney teams
(03-23-2021 01:00 PM)Todor Wrote:  
(03-23-2021 12:40 PM)DoubleRSU Wrote:  You can excuse Dixie and Tarleton off that list because it was their first transition year. We can wipe Chicago State off since that’s what we expect from them.

Definitely not great, but not too bad either.

It wasn't meant as a name and shame. Just our games versus teams that made the tournament.

Incidentally, Portland, who Seattle beat, beat Oregon State. Just a side bar of no real consequence, something I noticed.

Other side note, NMSU's 1 D1 non con game was not a tournament team. Otherwise, I believe everyone else had at least one.

I didn’t take it that way, just saying all things considered, not too bad. Not like a normal MEAC or SWAC non-conference resume.
03-23-2021 01:11 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.