(09-05-2020 09:56 AM)bullet Wrote: So if the president can be furloughed while school is in session, maybe you don't need a president.
The concept of a "furlough" for a salaried employee is a legal fiction. "Furlough" means that you don't work and you don't get paid for a given period of time. With hourly employees, that's easy to do - e.g., you tell an hourly worker that he is being furloughed one hour a day for the next month, and then instead of clocking in at 9 and out at 5 each day, he clocks out at 4 each day for that month and gets paid for 7 hours not 8.
But salaried employees, such as admins and faculty, can't have their "hours cut" like that because they don't work hours. They are basically "on call" all the time. E.g., when I (faculty) was hit with a 10% furlough 9 years ago, even though I was losing a month's salary, I wasn't able to just go on vacation for a month. I was expected to still meet all my classes, hold office hours, attend university meetings, and meet research goals - my whole job basically, but just get paid 10% less for it.
That's what is likely to happen here - the admins and coaches, etc. will all keep working, the furlough is basically a pay cut. But that distinction matters - a pernicious aspect of the difference between pay cut and furlough is the impact on retirement. If you are in a pension plan, from their POV the furlough means you didn't work during that time, even if you really did, so you don't accumulate service credit towards retirement. I had to pay over $4,000 to "buy back" that service credit even though I in-fact worked the whole damn time just like I always did. If they had called it a pay cut, then that wouldn't have been necessary. So that furlough hit my pocket twice. Still pisses me off thinking about it, LOL.