Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
2021 season opener
Author Message
Kaplony Offline
Palmetto State Deplorable

Posts: 25,393
Joined: Apr 2013
I Root For: Newberry
Location: SC
Post: #21
RE: 2021 season opener
(02-24-2020 01:46 PM)stever20 Wrote:  maybe the ACC bowls wouldn't be as good if Notre Dame wasn't around?? Ever think about that???

Indeed I have. It was brought up as a potential bonus to us selling out to them by the #goacc fanboys and has been thoroughly debunked.

We have essentially the same bowl lineup now as we had before they signed, except we downgraded the first non-BCS/New Year's Six bowl from the Peach Bowl to the kid sister of the Citrus. If anything our bowls are worse now than thy were before we added the parasites.
02-24-2020 02:41 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
stever20 Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 46,401
Joined: Nov 2011
Reputation: 740
I Root For: Sports
Location:
Post: #22
RE: 2021 season opener
(02-24-2020 02:41 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  
(02-24-2020 01:46 PM)stever20 Wrote:  maybe the ACC bowls wouldn't be as good if Notre Dame wasn't around?? Ever think about that???

Indeed I have. It was brought up as a potential bonus to us selling out to them by the #goacc fanboys and has been thoroughly debunked.

We have essentially the same bowl lineup now as we had before they signed, except we downgraded the first non-BCS/New Year's Six bowl from the Peach Bowl to the kid sister of the Citrus. If anything our bowls are worse now than thy were before we added the parasites.

That was going to happen regardless due to the NY6.

And yeah, I think having ND helped get the provision of Citrus/Outback now I think of if the Big Ten takes Orange bowl slot, ACC gets Citrus or Outback spot.
02-24-2020 02:55 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
quo vadis Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 50,157
Joined: Aug 2008
Reputation: 2419
I Root For: USF/Georgetown
Location: New Orleans
Post: #23
RE: 2021 season opener
(02-20-2020 12:40 PM)Michael in Raleigh Wrote:  Anyway, I dont like the App vs. ECU game being moved after it had been scheduled almost three years earlier than this Clemson vs. Georgia game, but it's just the way it is.

It's probably a good thing for both App and ECU. Play it on Saturday and it gets lost in the shuffle, but there will be a lot more exposure with the Thursday night time slot.
02-24-2020 02:56 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
quo vadis Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 50,157
Joined: Aug 2008
Reputation: 2419
I Root For: USF/Georgetown
Location: New Orleans
Post: #24
RE: 2021 season opener
(02-23-2020 12:04 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  Yes, Notre Dame is a parasite to ACC football. Contributes nothing yet gets to live off our bowl allotment.

03-lmfao

Kaplony at it again ... Notre Dame isn't a parasite on the ACC because ND is way more valuable than the average ACC team. Heck they are more valuable than all ACC teams, your Clemson included.

The ACC actually out-foxed the Irish, getting clearly more value from them than what they have to give. They get 4 or 5 games, almost half ND's schedule, which draws way more media interest than regular ACC games that basically nobody cares about and for what in return? Taking some 8-5 Boston College team's place in the Music City Bowl?

Heck the best proof of the one-sided nature of the deal was this year's bowl situation. Notre Dame went 10-2 or something and should have been the ACC replacement for Clemson in the Orange Bowl, but thanks to the smart negotiating of the ACC, they got stuck in a bozo third-run Orlando bowl vs a nobody Big 12 team while sorry UVA got to play in the Orange Bowl, when the whole world would have much rather seen a Florida - Notre Dame game..

So thank your lucky stars the Irish decided to affiliate with you guys and that the ACC negotiators out-dueled the ND negotiators in the bargain.
(This post was last modified: 02-24-2020 04:06 PM by JRsec.)
02-24-2020 03:06 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Captain Bearcat Offline
All-American in Everything
*

Posts: 9,501
Joined: Jun 2010
Reputation: 768
I Root For: UC
Location: IL & Cincinnati, USA
Post: #25
RE: 2021 season opener
(02-24-2020 02:41 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  
(02-24-2020 01:46 PM)stever20 Wrote:  maybe the ACC bowls wouldn't be as good if Notre Dame wasn't around?? Ever think about that???

Indeed I have. It was brought up as a potential bonus to us selling out to them by the #goacc fanboys and has been thoroughly debunked.

We have essentially the same bowl lineup now as we had before they signed, except we downgraded the first non-BCS/New Year's Six bowl from the Peach Bowl to the kid sister of the Citrus. If anything our bowls are worse now than thy were before we added the parasites.

The ACC bowl lineup hasn't improved because the ACC has fallen off a cliff. Notre Dame might be the only thing keeping the ACC bowl lineup from falling apart.

Clemson is a great media draw. But in 2013 when Notre Dame was added there were 3 other solid national media draws (FSU, Virginia Tech, & Miami). VT and Miami have been down for too long to draw national attention like they used to, and FSU has been way down in the past 3 years.
02-24-2020 03:14 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Kaplony Offline
Palmetto State Deplorable

Posts: 25,393
Joined: Apr 2013
I Root For: Newberry
Location: SC
Post: #26
RE: 2021 season opener
(02-24-2020 03:14 PM)Captain Bearcat Wrote:  
(02-24-2020 02:41 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  
(02-24-2020 01:46 PM)stever20 Wrote:  maybe the ACC bowls wouldn't be as good if Notre Dame wasn't around?? Ever think about that???

Indeed I have. It was brought up as a potential bonus to us selling out to them by the #goacc fanboys and has been thoroughly debunked.

We have essentially the same bowl lineup now as we had before they signed, except we downgraded the first non-BCS/New Year's Six bowl from the Peach Bowl to the kid sister of the Citrus. If anything our bowls are worse now than thy were before we added the parasites.

The ACC bowl lineup hasn't improved because the ACC has fallen off a cliff. Notre Dame might be the only thing keeping the ACC bowl lineup from falling apart.

Clemson is a great media draw. But in 2013 when Notre Dame was added there were 3 other solid national media draws (FSU, Virginia Tech, & Miami). VT and Miami have been down for too long to draw national attention like they used to, and FSU has been way down in the past 3 years.

Check your time frame then come back and tell the class where you made your mistake.
02-24-2020 03:30 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Kaplony Offline
Palmetto State Deplorable

Posts: 25,393
Joined: Apr 2013
I Root For: Newberry
Location: SC
Post: #27
RE: 2021 season opener
(02-24-2020 02:55 PM)stever20 Wrote:  
(02-24-2020 02:41 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  
(02-24-2020 01:46 PM)stever20 Wrote:  maybe the ACC bowls wouldn't be as good if Notre Dame wasn't around?? Ever think about that???

Indeed I have. It was brought up as a potential bonus to us selling out to them by the #goacc fanboys and has been thoroughly debunked.

We have essentially the same bowl lineup now as we had before they signed, except we downgraded the first non-BCS/New Year's Six bowl from the Peach Bowl to the kid sister of the Citrus. If anything our bowls are worse now than thy were before we added the parasites.

That was going to happen regardless due to the NY6.

And yeah, I think having ND helped get the provision of Citrus/Outback now I think of if the Big Ten takes Orange bowl slot, ACC gets Citrus or Outback spot.

The ACC was going to get that deal regardless because it was initiated by the Big 10 in a desire to diversify their bowl destinations in an attempt to avoid Florida fatigue. They had to make a deal with someone, and the ACC, with or without the parasites, was the only choice available.

And that agreement has now been dropped back from the Citrus to the Outback, so explain how exactly Notre Dame has benefited us at all.
02-24-2020 03:37 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
46566 Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 857
Joined: Dec 2019
Reputation: 12
I Root For: Gonzaga
Location: California
Post: #28
RE: 2021 season opener
(02-24-2020 03:37 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  
(02-24-2020 02:55 PM)stever20 Wrote:  
(02-24-2020 02:41 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  
(02-24-2020 01:46 PM)stever20 Wrote:  maybe the ACC bowls wouldn't be as good if Notre Dame wasn't around?? Ever think about that???

Indeed I have. It was brought up as a potential bonus to us selling out to them by the #goacc fanboys and has been thoroughly debunked.

We have essentially the same bowl lineup now as we had before they signed, except we downgraded the first non-BCS/New Year's Six bowl from the Peach Bowl to the kid sister of the Citrus. If anything our bowls are worse now than thy were before we added the parasites.

That was going to happen regardless due to the NY6.

And yeah, I think having ND helped get the provision of Citrus/Outback now I think of if the Big Ten takes Orange bowl slot, ACC gets Citrus or Outback spot.

The ACC was going to get that deal regardless because it was initiated by the Big 10 in a desire to diversify their bowl destinations in an attempt to avoid Florida fatigue. They had to make a deal with someone, and the ACC, with or without the parasites, was the only choice available.

And that agreement has now been dropped back from the Citrus to the Outback, so explain how exactly Notre Dame has benefited us at all.

The only benefit has been Notre Dame basketball and Olympic sports. ND jumped ship from the Big East when it was breaking up. The only fall back spots for ND is the AAC or Big East for Olympic sports.
02-24-2020 03:48 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Kaplony Offline
Palmetto State Deplorable

Posts: 25,393
Joined: Apr 2013
I Root For: Newberry
Location: SC
Post: #29
RE: 2021 season opener
(02-24-2020 03:48 PM)46566 Wrote:  
(02-24-2020 03:37 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  
(02-24-2020 02:55 PM)stever20 Wrote:  
(02-24-2020 02:41 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  
(02-24-2020 01:46 PM)stever20 Wrote:  maybe the ACC bowls wouldn't be as good if Notre Dame wasn't around?? Ever think about that???

Indeed I have. It was brought up as a potential bonus to us selling out to them by the #goacc fanboys and has been thoroughly debunked.

We have essentially the same bowl lineup now as we had before they signed, except we downgraded the first non-BCS/New Year's Six bowl from the Peach Bowl to the kid sister of the Citrus. If anything our bowls are worse now than thy were before we added the parasites.

That was going to happen regardless due to the NY6.

And yeah, I think having ND helped get the provision of Citrus/Outback now I think of if the Big Ten takes Orange bowl slot, ACC gets Citrus or Outback spot.

The ACC was going to get that deal regardless because it was initiated by the Big 10 in a desire to diversify their bowl destinations in an attempt to avoid Florida fatigue. They had to make a deal with someone, and the ACC, with or without the parasites, was the only choice available.

And that agreement has now been dropped back from the Citrus to the Outback, so explain how exactly Notre Dame has benefited us at all.

The only benefit has been Notre Dame basketball and Olympic sports. ND jumped ship from the Big East when it was breaking up. The only fall back spots for ND is the AAC or Big East for Olympic sports.

And we were stupid enough to fall for it, giving up good bowl spots for ACC members with nothing in return.

They desire independent football so much they should fully embrace it.
02-24-2020 03:59 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
JRsec Offline
Super Moderator
*

Posts: 38,198
Joined: Mar 2012
Reputation: 7916
I Root For: SEC
Location:
Post: #30
RE: 2021 season opener
(02-24-2020 03:06 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  
(02-23-2020 12:04 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  Yes, Notre Dame is a parasite to ACC football. Contributes nothing yet gets to live off our bowl allotment.

03-lmfao

Kaplony at it again ... Notre Dame isn't a parasite on the ACC because ND is way more valuable than the average ACC team. Heck they are more valuable than all ACC teams, your Clemson included.

The ACC actually out-foxed the Irish, getting clearly more value from them than what they have to give. They get 4 or 5 games, almost half ND's schedule, which draws way more media interest than regular ACC games that basically nobody cares about and for what in return? Taking some 8-5 Boston College team's place in the Music City Bowl?

Heck the best proof of the one-sided nature of the deal was this year's bowl situation. Notre Dame went 10-2 or something and should have been the ACC replacement for Clemson in the Orange Bowl, but thanks to the smart negotiating of the ACC, they got stuck in a bozo third-run Orlando bowl vs a nobody Big 12 team while sorry UVA got to play in the Orange Bowl, when the whole world would have much rather seen a Florida - Notre Dame game..

So thank your lucky stars the Irish decided to affiliate with you guys and that the ACC negotiators out-dueled the ND negotiators in the bargain.

There is truth and error in this post. It is true that Notre Dame's overall value is higher than anyone's in the ACC and almost higher than the top 3 products in the ACC combined with regard to football. But that has no relevance to the argument because Notre Dame keeps the rights to its home games and functions as a independent. So the only added value the ACC gets is the audience draw for the alternating 2 or 3 home games a year that one of their members has against Notre Dame.

That's not very much value.

What does Notre Dame get out of it? The get five guaranteed games a year. Why is that important to Notre Dame? Because nobody wanted to schedule them in the heart of their conference schedules so scheduling as a true independent got damned hard for the Irish to pull off year in and year out against any kind of a brand outside of their annuals with Stanford and USC.

Notre Dame has those 2 and likes to have another high value school to play each year and they can get that. But having 5 decent names to play for the bulk of the schedule without dropping down into the G5 regularly was tough to get on the dates they needed them. Partial membership solves that issue. That's a huge advantage for the Irish and only an advantage for 2 or 3 schools per year in the ACC. Advantage Notre Dame.

The ACC has to risk sharing its top bowl with the Irish. Advantage Notre Dame.

The ACC gets Notre Dame's minor sports. Advantage Notre Dame because in minor sports the reputation is already strong for the ACC.

So when Kaplony calls them a parasite he actually has a very valid point.

The only thing the Irish have done for the ACC is to stabilize the perception in 2011 that the ACC was vulnerable and they became an excuse for a damned ridiculously long GOR arrangement which has locked in competent football powers into giving away their value to basketball first schools in media revenue. And that's extremely parasitic for a school like Clemson, or Florida State when they are up to speed. The presidents at those two schools who signed a GOR that will last past the Baby Boom and their love for college football should be fired and smuggled out of town at night because if they hadn't signed that GOR both of those schools would be making oodles more elsewhere and Notre Dame was the excuse to sign. Advantage Notre Dame. Major loss for F.S.U. and Clemson.

So Quo before you jump on Kap for expressing his rational displeasure on this one you need to remove yourself and your past feelings from this equation and take a long hard look at actually what was gained by the Irish and what was lost by the ACC (particularly their football first schools) and then this will come more clearly into focus.

I also happen to know at a time when both F.S.U. and Clemson were going to bail and ESPN announced their moves to the SEC on a crawler that they Irish were insisting before they joined even in part that the football first schools had to be retained so ESPN backed away from their endorsement of the move following a blown big deal due to Tobacco Road's last minute change of heart which also precipitated Maryland's bolt to the Big 10.

So below the surface this isn't just woofing over Orange Bowl arrangements, but rather a general screw job that Clemson and F.S.U. got after being sold a bill of goods to sign that GOR especially with F.S.U.'s president at the time with a foot out of the door to a conference that didn't want to see that move happen.
(This post was last modified: 02-24-2020 04:28 PM by JRsec.)
02-24-2020 04:21 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Captain Bearcat Offline
All-American in Everything
*

Posts: 9,501
Joined: Jun 2010
Reputation: 768
I Root For: UC
Location: IL & Cincinnati, USA
Post: #31
RE: 2021 season opener
(02-24-2020 03:30 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  
(02-24-2020 03:14 PM)Captain Bearcat Wrote:  
(02-24-2020 02:41 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  
(02-24-2020 01:46 PM)stever20 Wrote:  maybe the ACC bowls wouldn't be as good if Notre Dame wasn't around?? Ever think about that???

Indeed I have. It was brought up as a potential bonus to us selling out to them by the #goacc fanboys and has been thoroughly debunked.

We have essentially the same bowl lineup now as we had before they signed, except we downgraded the first non-BCS/New Year's Six bowl from the Peach Bowl to the kid sister of the Citrus. If anything our bowls are worse now than thy were before we added the parasites.

The ACC bowl lineup hasn't improved because the ACC has fallen off a cliff. Notre Dame might be the only thing keeping the ACC bowl lineup from falling apart.

Clemson is a great media draw. But in 2013 when Notre Dame was added there were 3 other solid national media draws (FSU, Virginia Tech, & Miami). VT and Miami have been down for too long to draw national attention like they used to, and FSU has been way down in the past 3 years.

Check your time frame then come back and tell the class where you made your mistake.

Not sure what you're talking about. Notre Dame's first season in the ACC was 2013. The agreement was made in late 2012. Since then, FSU and Clemson switched places at the top, while VT and Miami have fallen off the map.



In 2013, Clemson was in year 4 of Dabo. 3 years in a row with 10+ wins. Before Dabo it had been 20 years since a 10-win season, but Clemson always had a big fanbase and they always had winning records. They were about equivalent to FSU today.

2013 FSU won the national title, their 3rd in 20 years. They were about where Clemson is today. Last losing season was 1976. Today, they have 2 straight losing seasons.

Virginia Tech won at least 10 games every year from 2004 - 2011. Since then, they've accomplished this once and haven't been ranked in the top-10 in any weekly poll. In 2018 VT had their first losing season since 1992.

In 2013, Miami was only 11 years removed from a national title, with only 1 losing season in those 11 years. They went 9-4 in 2013 and were ranked as high as 7th. Since then, they've been mediocre other than 10-3 in 2017. Today their national title is a distant memory.

There was also Louisville, which was coming off a Sugar Bowl win in 2012 and a 12-1 season in 2013. It was hoped they could use the ACC's exposure to grow into a national brand. But they've been unable to make the next step and haven't had a top-20 season since then.
02-24-2020 04:38 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Kaplony Offline
Palmetto State Deplorable

Posts: 25,393
Joined: Apr 2013
I Root For: Newberry
Location: SC
Post: #32
RE: 2021 season opener
(02-24-2020 04:38 PM)Captain Bearcat Wrote:  
(02-24-2020 03:30 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  
(02-24-2020 03:14 PM)Captain Bearcat Wrote:  
(02-24-2020 02:41 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  
(02-24-2020 01:46 PM)stever20 Wrote:  maybe the ACC bowls wouldn't be as good if Notre Dame wasn't around?? Ever think about that???

Indeed I have. It was brought up as a potential bonus to us selling out to them by the #goacc fanboys and has been thoroughly debunked.

We have essentially the same bowl lineup now as we had before they signed, except we downgraded the first non-BCS/New Year's Six bowl from the Peach Bowl to the kid sister of the Citrus. If anything our bowls are worse now than thy were before we added the parasites.

The ACC bowl lineup hasn't improved because the ACC has fallen off a cliff. Notre Dame might be the only thing keeping the ACC bowl lineup from falling apart.

Clemson is a great media draw. But in 2013 when Notre Dame was added there were 3 other solid national media draws (FSU, Virginia Tech, & Miami). VT and Miami have been down for too long to draw national attention like they used to, and FSU has been way down in the past 3 years.

Check your time frame then come back and tell the class where you made your mistake.

Not sure what you're talking about. Notre Dame's first season in the ACC was 2013. The agreement was made in late 2012. Since then, FSU and Clemson switched places at the top, while VT and Miami have fallen off the map.



In 2013, Clemson was in year 4 of Dabo. 3 years in a row with 10+ wins. Before Dabo it had been 20 years since a 10-win season, but Clemson always had a big fanbase and they always had winning records. They were about equivalent to FSU today.

2013 FSU won the national title, their 3rd in 20 years. They were about where Clemson is today. Last losing season was 1976. Today, they have 2 straight losing seasons.

Virginia Tech won at least 10 games every year from 2004 - 2011. Since then, they've accomplished this once and haven't been ranked in the top-10 in any weekly poll. In 2018 VT had their first losing season since 1992.

In 2013, Miami was only 11 years removed from a national title, with only 1 losing season in those 11 years. They went 9-4 in 2013 and were ranked as high as 7th. Since then, they've been mediocre other than 10-3 in 2017. Today their national title is a distant memory.

There was also Louisville, which was coming off a Sugar Bowl win in 2012 and a 12-1 season in 2013. It was hoped they could use the ACC's exposure to grow into a national brand. But they've been unable to make the next step and haven't had a top-20 season since then.

OK, whatever.

Point out exactly which bowl the ACC picked up because of Notre Dame?

The second tier game in the Citrus Bowl? Was already an ACC Bowl

The Belk? Already an ACC Bowl.

The Sun? Already an ACC Bowl.

The Music City? Already an ACC Bowl.

The Military? Already an ACC Bowl. (And this went to a conditional pick)

The Independence? Already an ACC Bowl.

The only bowls the ACC picked up after Notre Dame joined was two years of the Beef O'Brady's (Now the Gaspirilla), the Pinstripe (who didn't have any other conference choice other than a gutted AAC), a conditional with the Birmingham, a conditional with the Gator, the new bowl in Detroit, and the conditional Citrus pick mentioned earlier in the thread.

So explain to me exactly how Notre Dame benefited the ACC in it's bowl lineup. Be as specific as possible.
02-24-2020 04:57 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
46566 Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 857
Joined: Dec 2019
Reputation: 12
I Root For: Gonzaga
Location: California
Post: #33
RE: 2021 season opener
(02-24-2020 03:59 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  
(02-24-2020 03:48 PM)46566 Wrote:  
(02-24-2020 03:37 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  
(02-24-2020 02:55 PM)stever20 Wrote:  
(02-24-2020 02:41 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  Indeed I have. It was brought up as a potential bonus to us selling out to them by the #goacc fanboys and has been thoroughly debunked.

We have essentially the same bowl lineup now as we had before they signed, except we downgraded the first non-BCS/New Year's Six bowl from the Peach Bowl to the kid sister of the Citrus. If anything our bowls are worse now than thy were before we added the parasites.

That was going to happen regardless due to the NY6.

And yeah, I think having ND helped get the provision of Citrus/Outback now I think of if the Big Ten takes Orange bowl slot, ACC gets Citrus or Outback spot.

The ACC was going to get that deal regardless because it was initiated by the Big 10 in a desire to diversify their bowl destinations in an attempt to avoid Florida fatigue. They had to make a deal with someone, and the ACC, with or without the parasites, was the only choice available.

And that agreement has now been dropped back from the Citrus to the Outback, so explain how exactly Notre Dame has benefited us at all.

The only benefit has been Notre Dame basketball and Olympic sports. ND jumped ship from the Big East when it was breaking up. The only fall back spots for ND is the AAC or Big East for Olympic sports.

And we were stupid enough to fall for it, giving up good bowl spots for ACC members with nothing in return.

They desire independent football so much they should fully embrace it.

All the ACC has to do is ask Notre Dame for all sports membership by a set date. ACC could pass a conference bylaw that any school with more then 1 team in a conference sport to have football in the conference. Basically kick Notre Dame out but make it Notre Dames idea, do them a solid by waving or lowering the penalty for leaving. ACC no longer needs Notre Dame and with the new network there in better shape.
Notre Dame has only 2 conferences as possible landing points AAC as a non football member (UMass as football mostly not to invite UConn back) or the Big East. Notre Dame might get away with 3 games a year plus Navy.
02-24-2020 05:02 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
billybobby777 Offline
The REAL BillyBobby
*

Posts: 11,898
Joined: May 2013
Reputation: 502
I Root For: ECU, Army
Location: Houston dont sleepon
Post: #34
RE: 2021 season opener
(02-24-2020 01:43 PM)Hokie Mark Wrote:  
(02-23-2020 12:04 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  ...Notre Dame is a parasite to ACC football. Contributes nothing yet gets to live off our bowl allotment.

Nah, I see them as more like intestinal symbiotes.
07-coffee3

Worms
02-24-2020 07:08 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
TerryD Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 14,957
Joined: Feb 2006
Reputation: 918
I Root For: Notre Dame
Location: Grayson Highlands
Post: #35
RE: 2021 season opener
(02-24-2020 02:55 PM)stever20 Wrote:  
(02-24-2020 02:41 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  
(02-24-2020 01:46 PM)stever20 pid=
T'16696472 Wrote:
maybe the ACC bowls wouldn't be as good if Notre Dame wasn't around?? Ever think about that???

Indeed I have. It was brought up as a potential bonus to us selling out to them by the #goacc fanboys and has been thoroughly debunked.

We have essentially the same bowl lineup now as we had before they signed, except we downgraded the first non-BCS/New Year's Six bowl from the Peach Bowl to the kid sister of the Citrus. If anything our bowls are worse now than thy were before we added the parasites.

That was going to happen regardless due to the NY6.

And yeah, I think having ND helped get the provision of Citrus/Outback now I think of if the Big Ten takes Orange bowl slot, ACC gets Citrus or Outback spot.

Then there is the ACC Network, which John Swofford says may not have happened without ND.

There are also the increased ticket sales at many ACC venues when ND football comes to town.

Georgia Tech and Wake Forest are moving their ND games next season to NFL stadiums to sell more tickets.

Duke and other ACC teams jack up the ND ticket prices more than their other home games.

(I know, I went to the Duke game last season).

I also remember the hype and TV ratings for the 2014 FSU/ND game at Tallahassee and the 2015 ND/Clemson game at Clemson.

But no, ND adds nothing to the ACC in return for $6.4 million a year from the conference/ESPN and for minor bowl bid eligibility. 01-wingedeagle

P.S. JR, if you are referencing the Orange Bowl as the ACC's top bowl, ND is not part of that side of the deal. It cannot supplant an ACC member.
(This post was last modified: 02-24-2020 08:06 PM by TerryD.)
02-24-2020 07:59 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
TerryD Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 14,957
Joined: Feb 2006
Reputation: 918
I Root For: Notre Dame
Location: Grayson Highlands
Post: #36
RE: 2021 season opener
(02-24-2020 05:02 PM)46566 Wrote:  
(02-24-2020 03:59 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  
(02-24-2020 03:48 PM)46566 Wrote:  
(02-24-2020 03:37 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  
(02-24-2020 02:55 PM)stever20 Wrote:  That was going to happen regardless due to the NY6.

And yeah, I think having ND helped get the provision of Citrus/Outback now I think of if the Big Ten takes Orange bowl slot, ACC gets Citrus or Outback spot.

The ACC was going to get that deal regardless because it was initiated by the Big 10 in a desire to diversify their bowl destinations in an attempt to avoid Florida fatigue. They had to make a deal with someone, and the ACC, with or without the parasites, was the only choice available.

And that agreement has now been dropped back from the Citrus to the Outback, so explain how exactly Notre Dame has benefited us at all.

The only benefit has been Notre Dame basketball and Olympic sports. ND jumped ship from the Big East when it was breaking up. The only fall back spots for ND is the AAC or Big East for Olympic sports.

And we were stupid enough to fall for it, giving up good bowl spots for ACC members with nothing in return.

They desire independent football so much they should fully embrace it.

All the ACC has to do is ask Notre Dame for all sports membership by a set date. ACC could pass a conference bylaw that any school with more then 1 team in a conference sport to have football in the conference. Basically kick Notre Dame out but make it Notre Dames idea, do them a solid by waving or lowering the penalty for leaving. ACC no longer needs Notre Dame and with the new network there in better shape.
Notre Dame has only 2 conferences as possible landing points AAC as a non football member (UMass as football mostly not to invite UConn back) or the Big East. Notre Dame might get away with 3 games a year plus Navy.

ND and the ACC signed a series of contracts that lock in the current arrangement until 2036.

Sure, contracts are made to be broken, but at what cost and for what reason?

Both ND and the ACC are happy with the current arrangement.
02-24-2020 08:02 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
TerryD Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 14,957
Joined: Feb 2006
Reputation: 918
I Root For: Notre Dame
Location: Grayson Highlands
Post: #37
RE: 2021 season opener
(02-24-2020 04:21 PM)JRsec Wrote:  
(02-24-2020 03:06 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  
(02-23-2020 12:04 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  Yes, Notre Dame is a parasite to ACC football. Contributes nothing yet gets to live off our bowl allotment.

03-lmfao

Kaplony at it again ... Notre Dame isn't a parasite on the ACC because ND is way more valuable than the average ACC team. Heck they are more valuable than all ACC teams, your Clemson included.

The ACC actually out-foxed the Irish, getting clearly more value from them than what they have to give. They get 4 or 5 games, almost half ND's schedule, which draws way more media interest than regular ACC games that basically nobody cares about and for what in return? Taking some 8-5 Boston College team's place in the Music City Bowl?

Heck the best proof of the one-sided nature of the deal was this year's bowl situation. Notre Dame went 10-2 or something and should have been the ACC replacement for Clemson in the Orange Bowl, but thanks to the smart negotiating of the ACC, they got stuck in a bozo third-run Orlando bowl vs a nobody Big 12 team while sorry UVA got to play in the Orange Bowl, when the whole world would have much rather seen a Florida - Notre Dame game..

So thank your lucky stars the Irish decided to affiliate with you guys and that the ACC negotiators out-dueled the ND negotiators in the bargain.

There is truth and error in this post. It is true that Notre Dame's overall value is higher than anyone's in the ACC and almost higher than the top 3 products in the ACC combined with regard to football. But that has no relevance to the argument because Notre Dame keeps the rights to its home games and functions as a independent. So the only added value the ACC gets is the audience draw for the alternating 2 or 3 home games a year that one of their members has against Notre Dame.

That's not very much value.

What does Notre Dame get out of it? The get five guaranteed games a year. Why is that important to Notre Dame? Because nobody wanted to schedule them in the heart of their conference schedules so scheduling as a true independent got damned hard for the Irish to pull off year in and year out against any kind of a brand outside of their annuals with Stanford and USC.

Notre Dame has those 2 and likes to have another high value school to play each year and they can get that. But having 5 decent names to play for the bulk of the schedule without dropping down into the G5 regularly was tough to get on the dates they needed them. Partial membership solves that issue. That's a huge advantage for the Irish and only an advantage for 2 or 3 schools per year in the ACC. Advantage Notre Dame.

The ACC has to risk sharing its top bowl with the Irish. Advantage Notre Dame.

The ACC gets Notre Dame's minor sports. Advantage Notre Dame because in minor sports the reputation is already strong for the ACC.

So when Kaplony calls them a parasite he actually has a very valid point.

The only thing the Irish have done for the ACC is to stabilize the perception in 2011 that the ACC was vulnerable and they became an excuse for a damned ridiculously long GOR arrangement which has locked in competent football powers into giving away their value to basketball first schools in media revenue. And that's extremely parasitic for a school like Clemson, or Florida State when they are up to speed. The presidents at those two schools who signed a GOR that will last past the Baby Boom and their love for college football should be fired and smuggled out of town at night because if they hadn't signed that GOR both of those schools would be making oodles more elsewhere and Notre Dame was the excuse to sign. Advantage Notre Dame. Major loss for F.S.U. and Clemson.

So Quo before you jump on Kap for expressing his rational displeasure on this one you need to remove yourself and your past feelings from this equation and take a long hard look at actually what was gained by the Irish and what was lost by the ACC (particularly their football first schools) and then this will come more clearly into focus.

I also happen to know at a time when both F.S.U. and Clemson were going to bail and ESPN announced their moves to the SEC on a crawler that they Irish were insisting before they joined even in part that the football first schools had to be retained so ESPN backed away from their endorsement of the move following a blown big deal due to Tobacco Road's last minute change of heart which also precipitated Maryland's bolt to the Big 10.

So below the surface this isn't just woofing over Orange Bowl arrangements, but rather a general screw job that Clemson and F.S.U. got after being sold a bill of goods to sign that GOR especially with F.S.U.'s president at the time with a foot out of the door to a conference that didn't want to see that move happen.

Sounds like ND had the leverage and the better negotiators.

Isn't that capitalism at its finest?
02-24-2020 08:07 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
JRsec Offline
Super Moderator
*

Posts: 38,198
Joined: Mar 2012
Reputation: 7916
I Root For: SEC
Location:
Post: #38
RE: 2021 season opener
(02-24-2020 08:07 PM)TerryD Wrote:  
(02-24-2020 04:21 PM)JRsec Wrote:  
(02-24-2020 03:06 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  
(02-23-2020 12:04 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  Yes, Notre Dame is a parasite to ACC football. Contributes nothing yet gets to live off our bowl allotment.

03-lmfao

Kaplony at it again ... Notre Dame isn't a parasite on the ACC because ND is way more valuable than the average ACC team. Heck they are more valuable than all ACC teams, your Clemson included.

The ACC actually out-foxed the Irish, getting clearly more value from them than what they have to give. They get 4 or 5 games, almost half ND's schedule, which draws way more media interest than regular ACC games that basically nobody cares about and for what in return? Taking some 8-5 Boston College team's place in the Music City Bowl?

Heck the best proof of the one-sided nature of the deal was this year's bowl situation. Notre Dame went 10-2 or something and should have been the ACC replacement for Clemson in the Orange Bowl, but thanks to the smart negotiating of the ACC, they got stuck in a bozo third-run Orlando bowl vs a nobody Big 12 team while sorry UVA got to play in the Orange Bowl, when the whole world would have much rather seen a Florida - Notre Dame game..

So thank your lucky stars the Irish decided to affiliate with you guys and that the ACC negotiators out-dueled the ND negotiators in the bargain.

There is truth and error in this post. It is true that Notre Dame's overall value is higher than anyone's in the ACC and almost higher than the top 3 products in the ACC combined with regard to football. But that has no relevance to the argument because Notre Dame keeps the rights to its home games and functions as a independent. So the only added value the ACC gets is the audience draw for the alternating 2 or 3 home games a year that one of their members has against Notre Dame.

That's not very much value.

What does Notre Dame get out of it? The get five guaranteed games a year. Why is that important to Notre Dame? Because nobody wanted to schedule them in the heart of their conference schedules so scheduling as a true independent got damned hard for the Irish to pull off year in and year out against any kind of a brand outside of their annuals with Stanford and USC.

Notre Dame has those 2 and likes to have another high value school to play each year and they can get that. But having 5 decent names to play for the bulk of the schedule without dropping down into the G5 regularly was tough to get on the dates they needed them. Partial membership solves that issue. That's a huge advantage for the Irish and only an advantage for 2 or 3 schools per year in the ACC. Advantage Notre Dame.

The ACC has to risk sharing its top bowl with the Irish. Advantage Notre Dame.

The ACC gets Notre Dame's minor sports. Advantage Notre Dame because in minor sports the reputation is already strong for the ACC.

So when Kaplony calls them a parasite he actually has a very valid point.

The only thing the Irish have done for the ACC is to stabilize the perception in 2011 that the ACC was vulnerable and they became an excuse for a damned ridiculously long GOR arrangement which has locked in competent football powers into giving away their value to basketball first schools in media revenue. And that's extremely parasitic for a school like Clemson, or Florida State when they are up to speed. The presidents at those two schools who signed a GOR that will last past the Baby Boom and their love for college football should be fired and smuggled out of town at night because if they hadn't signed that GOR both of those schools would be making oodles more elsewhere and Notre Dame was the excuse to sign. Advantage Notre Dame. Major loss for F.S.U. and Clemson.

So Quo before you jump on Kap for expressing his rational displeasure on this one you need to remove yourself and your past feelings from this equation and take a long hard look at actually what was gained by the Irish and what was lost by the ACC (particularly their football first schools) and then this will come more clearly into focus.

I also happen to know at a time when both F.S.U. and Clemson were going to bail and ESPN announced their moves to the SEC on a crawler that they Irish were insisting before they joined even in part that the football first schools had to be retained so ESPN backed away from their endorsement of the move following a blown big deal due to Tobacco Road's last minute change of heart which also precipitated Maryland's bolt to the Big 10.

So below the surface this isn't just woofing over Orange Bowl arrangements, but rather a general screw job that Clemson and F.S.U. got after being sold a bill of goods to sign that GOR especially with F.S.U.'s president at the time with a foot out of the door to a conference that didn't want to see that move happen.

Sounds like ND had the leverage and the better negotiators.

Isn't that capitalism at its finest?
It's certainly not Notre Dame's fault if that's what you are asking? They acted in their self interest and used their leverage. The matters in question are all internal the ACC conference's leadership. But then that has been a constant predating most modern realignment.
02-24-2020 08:37 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.