(01-19-2020 09:17 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote: I have absolutely no problem honoring Dorrie Miller, who is a genuine war hero of the highest sort.
I do have two minor objections:
1) This marks a break from the Navy tradition of naming carriers, and we have done too much breaking the traditions in this area. If we are going to do that, I would have preferred giving his name to the new submarine to be named USS Arizona, and leaving the name Arizona permanently unused in memory of the battleship sunk at Pearl Harbor. I would like to go back to historic naming conventions.
2) There was originally a belief that it was going to be named Ranger, in honor of John Paul Jones's ship and six subsequent Rangers, including the most recent, my old ship, CV-61.
For those who do not know, these are the historic ship naming conventions:
Battleships - States
Cruisers - Cities
Destroyers - War (primarily naval) heroes
Submarines - Fish and other sea animals
Modern technology has brought about three new ship types:
Aircraft carriers - Named for famous battles (Antietam, Saratoga) or famous former warships (Ranger, Constellation) or presidents (FDR, JFK, GHWB, Ford), with exceptions (Shangri-La, Kitty Hawk, Forrestal, Nimitz, Stennis).
Nuclear ballistic missile submarines - States (these are modern equivalents to battleships, so this makes sense)
Nuclear attack submarines - Cities (these are modern equivalents to cruisers, so this makes sense too).
Personally,
1) I would like to see CVNs named for presidents. I would also like to see us build a smaller class of conventional CVs (the cost of the Fords is outrageous, and significantly impairs our ability to maintain a fleet at required levels) named for historic battles or former warships (selfishly, Ranger was my first ship, and I would like to see another).
2) Given the advances in air independent propulsion (AIP subs can now actually be quieter than nukes because even when standing still, nukes have to run pumps to cool the reactor core) and the increasing cost of nuke subs, I would also like to see us build a class of AIPs to allow us to keep a larger number of subs and also to perform certain high-risk missions for which AIPs may be more appropriate than nukes, and I would like to return to fish names for those ships.