(01-16-2020 04:39 AM)MUther Wrote:  

(01-15-2020 08:46 PM)georgia_tech_swagger Wrote:  The only thing that changed was the JavaScript being used was fixed (the transparency was not showing up properly due a conflict in JavaScript libraries). Previously it worked exactly the same ... but you couldn't see what was underneath. You prefer it to just be opaque basically?

However it was, was better, imo. For some reason this messes with me. Figured I give you a straight answer while you decrypt whatever the hell Stinkfist said. But it's not a big enough deal to me to force another change on others if they like it. Was just discussing it.

I made it just ever so slightly transparent ... very close to fully opaque. That work better for you?

thank you GTS....

(01-16-2020 08:29 PM)georgia_tech_swagger Wrote:  

(01-16-2020 04:39 AM)MUther Wrote:  

(01-15-2020 08:46 PM)georgia_tech_swagger Wrote:  The only thing that changed was the JavaScript being used was fixed (the transparency was not showing up properly due a conflict in JavaScript libraries). Previously it worked exactly the same ... but you couldn't see what was underneath. You prefer it to just be opaque basically?

However it was, was better, imo. For some reason this messes with me. Figured I give you a straight answer while you decrypt whatever the hell Stinkfist said. But it's not a big enough deal to me to force another change on others if they like it. Was just discussing it.

I made it just ever so slightly transparent ... very close to fully opaque. That work better for you?

yep