(12-10-2019 09:49 PM)Fishpro10987 Wrote:  

(12-09-2019 05:02 PM)Psicosis Wrote:  

Quote:However, if it was ruled a catch, it’s first down Memphis, not in FG range. So not really a game changer.

First down at the 30 yard line is "not in field goal range." The hell are you on, dude, our kicker hit two 50-yarders in the championship game.

The ref said after further review the ball hit the ground. For the sake of transparency and leaving no doubt, the AAC should have released the determining video evidence. If none exists, admit a referee error like they have done in other instances.

I have watched that catch two dozen times. You can see the ball change direction in his lap, but I defy anybody to show me where the ground caused the movement.

If you can't see it, you can't overturn the damn call.

(12-10-2019 10:34 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(12-10-2019 09:49 PM)Fishpro10987 Wrote:  

(12-09-2019 05:02 PM)Psicosis Wrote:  

Quote:However, if it was ruled a catch, it’s first down Memphis, not in FG range. So not really a game changer.

First down at the 30 yard line is "not in field goal range." The hell are you on, dude, our kicker hit two 50-yarders in the championship game.

The ref said after further review the ball hit the ground. For the sake of transparency and leaving no doubt, the AAC should have released the determining video evidence. If none exists, admit a referee error like they have done in other instances.

I have watched that catch two dozen times. You can see the ball change direction in his lap, but I defy anybody to show me where the ground caused the movement.

If you can't see it, you can't overturn the damn call.

I agree 100%. Saw it move but no evidence it hit the ground.

(12-10-2019 10:34 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(12-10-2019 09:49 PM)Fishpro10987 Wrote:  

(12-09-2019 05:02 PM)Psicosis Wrote:  

Quote:However, if it was ruled a catch, it’s first down Memphis, not in FG range. So not really a game changer.

First down at the 30 yard line is "not in field goal range." The hell are you on, dude, our kicker hit two 50-yarders in the championship game.

The ref said after further review the ball hit the ground. For the sake of transparency and leaving no doubt, the AAC should have released the determining video evidence. If none exists, admit a referee error like they have done in other instances.

I have watched that catch two dozen times. You can see the ball change direction in his lap, but I defy anybody to show me where the ground caused the movement.

If you can't see it, you can't overturn the damn call.

^^^^^