(10-23-2019 02:26 PM)ODU BBALL Wrote:  

(10-23-2019 02:07 PM)JDTulane Wrote:  

(10-23-2019 01:18 PM)UC KMF Wrote:  

(10-23-2019 12:59 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  LOCK THEM UP!
LOCK THEM UP!
LOCK THEM UP!
LOCK THEM UP!
LOCK THEM UP!
LOCK THEM UP!
LOCK THEM UP!

Electronic devices transmitting potential top secret information is enough for jail time, but having 30k emails on an unsecured server with the same type of top secret information is not??? Seems right...

Lol 24 posts is all it took before "BUT THE EMAILS"

Crimes don't have to be solved and brought to justice early to still be crimes. Hillary (for example) broke laws (plural) by her gross mishandling of Classified Data, and anyone that would question that is either unknowing, or won't admit it due to their extreme political bias. I had a high level government clearance for nearly 40 years so I am well aware of what is required (by penalty of law) in the trusted handling of this country's secrets, and she failed miserably - and purposefully - on several accounts. The stated penalties for those failures are high, and yet she has not paid for any of it. At the same time, a Hollywood actress has recently been placed in jail for paying the sum of $15,000 to get help in getting her daughter into college. Yeah, not much of a double standard there is it?

You don't want to hear about it ...... TFB.

The bribes were 500k the "charitable donation" was 15k

Curious, how much longer are you guys going to go with this nonsensical "secret" ? You are aware that all these hearings have GOP representation in them, right? We live in a representative republic and you are being represented by those folks in the room. Nothing is secret. No rules are being broken.

You do realize that your continual insistence otherwise just makes you look foolish, right?

(10-23-2019 02:14 PM)ODU BBALL Wrote:  

(10-23-2019 12:59 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  LOCK THEM UP!
LOCK THEM UP!
LOCK THEM UP!
LOCK THEM UP!
LOCK THEM UP!
LOCK THEM UP!
LOCK THEM UP!

Patience, patience there Leftwing Grasshopper. Barr and Durham are making a list and checking it twice (just like Santa), and will soon enough be rounding up the people on the Left that have led the country into all of this illegal chaos. Don't play dumb by acting like you don't know who I am referring to. I gave you a few - but certainly not all - of the more obvious ones in a prior posting.

It's telling how the Dems have to do their dirty deeds in total secrecy. What's up with them having so many unidentified informants? Anonymous whistle blowers? Anonymous writers? Anonymous sources? So much to hide when they are doing their secret subversive maneuvers.

As for the House Republicans stroking the meeting today .... keep in mind that all of this is happening under the House "Leadership" (LOL) of Democrat Nancy Peloci. She is obviously not in control of her House with this happening and the "Squad" representing the radical Left pushing things on her.

*Pelosi was at her brother's funeral today.

(10-23-2019 02:22 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-23-2019 02:14 PM)ODU BBALL Wrote:  

(10-23-2019 12:59 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  LOCK THEM UP!
LOCK THEM UP!
LOCK THEM UP!
LOCK THEM UP!
LOCK THEM UP!
LOCK THEM UP!
LOCK THEM UP!

Patience, patience there Leftwing Grasshopper. Barr and Durham are making a list and checking it twice (just like Santa), and will soon enough be rounding up the people on the Left that have led the country into all of this illegal chaos. Don't play dumb by acting like you don't know who I am referring to. I gave you a few - but certainly not all - of the more obvious ones in a prior posting.

It's telling how the Dems have to do their dirty deeds in total secrecy. What's up with them having so many unidentified informants? Anonymous whistle blowers? Anonymous writers? Anonymous sources? So much to hide when they are doing their secret subversive maneuvers.

As for the House Republicans stroking the meeting today .... keep in mind that all of this is happening under the House "Leadership" (LOL) of Democrat Nancy Peloci. She is obviously not in control of her House with this happening and the "Squad" representing the radical Left pushing things on her.

Barr better hurry then, he might be in jail before much longer.

Yes, the Dems are desperately trying to cut them off at the pass before the truth rears it's ugly face aren't they? Do they have some paid for secret, unidentified, anonymous informants that are going to lie that he did something too?

People will say anything if you entice them with enough money, and Dems like Sorous have way more money than they would ever need for themselves. I am guessing that his name has come up in their (Barr and Duram's) investigation as they follow the money trail.

(10-23-2019 02:31 PM)tennis2k4 Wrote:  

(10-23-2019 02:14 PM)ODU BBALL Wrote:  

(10-23-2019 12:59 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  LOCK THEM UP!
LOCK THEM UP!
LOCK THEM UP!
LOCK THEM UP!
LOCK THEM UP!
LOCK THEM UP!
LOCK THEM UP!

Patience, patience there Leftwing Grasshopper. Barr and Durham are making a list and checking it twice (just like Santa), and will soon enough be rounding up the people on the Left that have led the country into all of this illegal chaos. Don't play dumb by acting like you don't know who I am referring to. I gave you a few - but certainly not all - of the more obvious ones in a prior posting.

It's telling how the Dems have to do their dirty deeds in total secrecy. What's up with them having so many unidentified informants? Anonymous whistle blowers? Anonymous writers? Anonymous sources? So much to hide when they are doing their secret subversive maneuvers.

As for the House Republicans stroking the meeting today .... keep in mind that all of this is happening under the House "Leadership" (LOL) of Democrat Nancy Peloci. She is obviously not in control of her House with this happening and the "Squad" representing the radical Left pushing things on her.

*Pelosi was at her brother's funeral today.

She lost control of the House long before today's date, long before.

(10-23-2019 02:31 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Curious, how much longer are you guys going to go with this nonsensical "secret" ? You are aware that all these hearings have GOP representation in them, right? We live in a representative republic and you are being represented by those folks in the room. Nothing is secret. No rules are being broken.

You do realize that your continual insistence otherwise just makes you look foolish, right?

Rather than call you something, I will give you credit for being uninformed about things Tom. If you are trying to convey that things are being done in a bipartisan method with these hearings then you are uninformed, or misstating the facts to suit your desired representation of things. A couple of days ago I was shocked to witness a House Democrat on TV say as much about how the information was being handed out to the other side.

(10-23-2019 02:40 PM)ODU BBALL Wrote:  

(10-23-2019 02:31 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Curious, how much longer are you guys going to go with this nonsensical "secret" ? You are aware that all these hearings have GOP representation in them, right? We live in a representative republic and you are being represented by those folks in the room. Nothing is secret. No rules are being broken.

You do realize that your continual insistence otherwise just makes you look foolish, right?

Rather than call you something, I will give you credit for being uninformed about things Tom. If you are trying to convey that things are being done in a bipartisan method with these hearings then you are uninformed, or misstating the facts to suit your desired representation of things. A couple of days ago I was shocked to witness a House Democrat on TV say as much about how the information was being handed out to the other side.

Dude, you're just plain wrong! These meetings are of house committees with Republicans who sit on those committees in attendance. They follow house rules and those GOP members are allotted time to question witnesses.

Now, if you have actual evidence to the contrary of what is happening, I'll gladly look at it.

But if you're claiming that there are more D's in the room than R's, you don't know how things work. The D's get more members and chair the committees because they hold the majority in the house. Elections have consequences I've been told.

(10-23-2019 02:28 PM)tennis2k4 Wrote:  

(10-23-2019 02:26 PM)ODU BBALL Wrote:  

(10-23-2019 02:07 PM)JDTulane Wrote:  

(10-23-2019 01:18 PM)UC KMF Wrote:  

(10-23-2019 12:59 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  LOCK THEM UP!
LOCK THEM UP!
LOCK THEM UP!
LOCK THEM UP!
LOCK THEM UP!
LOCK THEM UP!
LOCK THEM UP!

Electronic devices transmitting potential top secret information is enough for jail time, but having 30k emails on an unsecured server with the same type of top secret information is not??? Seems right...

Lol 24 posts is all it took before "BUT THE EMAILS"

Crimes don't have to be solved and brought to justice early to still be crimes. Hillary (for example) broke laws (plural) by her gross mishandling of Classified Data, and anyone that would question that is either unknowing, or won't admit it due to their extreme political bias. I had a high level government clearance for nearly 40 years so I am well aware of what is required (by penalty of law) in the trusted handling of this country's secrets, and she failed miserably - and purposefully - on several accounts. The stated penalties for those failures are high, and yet she has not paid for any of it. At the same time, a Hollywood actress has recently been placed in jail for paying the sum of $15,000 to get help in getting her daughter into college. Yeah, not much of a double standard there is it?

You don't want to hear about it ...... TFB.

The bribes were 500k the "charitable donation" was 15k

You're confusing the people and the facts of different cases. Huffman is the case I was referring to and she was accused of paying $15,000 (only). See link below.

https://news.yahoo.com/is-felicity-huffm...17766.html

Thread.

(10-23-2019 02:17 PM)gobluebigjon Wrote:  

(10-23-2019 02:14 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(10-23-2019 02:04 PM)gobluebigjon Wrote:  

(10-23-2019 02:01 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(10-23-2019 01:59 PM)gobluebigjon Wrote:  Haha not everyone is entitled to be in those hearings...my feelings are just fine

So, I guess you'll have to charge them with "false entitlement".

btw, I saw Steve Scalise walking through those doors as well. Surprised one of the dems didnt start shooting at him again.

Well laid out argument.

Scalise is not my concern either. Try harder

If you want to respond to me, why not take me off ignore and use your normal profile instead of this fake account?

Not sure who you are referring to but I have no other account. I show up here on occasion and like to argue. If you can’t handle that it’s not my problem that’s on you

Let me help you out. Go to your profile, see the 2 people who have given you positive reps over the past 4 years, and just pick one of them. Thats who I'm referring to.

(10-23-2019 02:52 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Thread.

It’s sad they did that and it’s even worse good people are defending it.

(10-23-2019 02:45 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-23-2019 02:40 PM)ODU BBALL Wrote:  

(10-23-2019 02:31 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Curious, how much longer are you guys going to go with this nonsensical "secret" ? You are aware that all these hearings have GOP representation in them, right? We live in a representative republic and you are being represented by those folks in the room. Nothing is secret. No rules are being broken.

You do realize that your continual insistence otherwise just makes you look foolish, right?

Rather than call you something, I will give you credit for being uninformed about things Tom. If you are trying to convey that things are being done in a bipartisan method with these hearings then you are uninformed, or misstating the facts to suit your desired representation of things. A couple of days ago I was shocked to witness a House Democrat on TV say as much about how the information was being handed out to the other side.

Dude, you're just plain wrong! These meetings are of house committees with Republicans who sit on those committees in attendance. They follow house rules and those GOP members are allotted time to question witnesses.

Now, if you have actual evidence to the contrary of what is happening, I'll gladly look at it.

But if you're claiming that there are more D's in the room than R's, you don't know how things work. Elections have consequences. The D's get more members because they hold the majority in the house. Elections have consequences I've been told.

Evidence be damned Tom. You have already made up your mind. The light of day is the best disinfectant. I'm not going to waste time looking up stuff that you yourself could if you wanted to genuinely know the truth. That said here is a quick one from today that should at the very least make you go hummmm if you are as righteous about the truth as you seemingly want to appear to be.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/poli...997318002/

(10-23-2019 02:54 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(10-23-2019 02:17 PM)gobluebigjon Wrote:  

(10-23-2019 02:14 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(10-23-2019 02:04 PM)gobluebigjon Wrote:  

(10-23-2019 02:01 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  So, I guess you'll have to charge them with "false entitlement".

btw, I saw Steve Scalise walking through those doors as well. Surprised one of the dems didnt start shooting at him again.

Well laid out argument.

Scalise is not my concern either. Try harder

If you want to respond to me, why not take me off ignore and use your normal profile instead of this fake account?

Not sure who you are referring to but I have no other account. I show up here on occasion and like to argue. If you can’t handle that it’s not my problem that’s on you

Let me help you out. Go to your profile, see the 2 people who have given you positive reps over the past 4 years, and just pick one of them. Thats who I'm referring to.

Haha I’m just me.

(10-23-2019 02:54 PM)gobluebigjon Wrote:  

(10-23-2019 02:52 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Thread.

It’s sad they did that and it’s even worse good people are defending it.

Define good?

(10-23-2019 02:56 PM)ODU BBALL Wrote:  

(10-23-2019 02:45 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-23-2019 02:40 PM)ODU BBALL Wrote:  

(10-23-2019 02:31 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Curious, how much longer are you guys going to go with this nonsensical "secret" ? You are aware that all these hearings have GOP representation in them, right? We live in a representative republic and you are being represented by those folks in the room. Nothing is secret. No rules are being broken.

You do realize that your continual insistence otherwise just makes you look foolish, right?

Rather than call you something, I will give you credit for being uninformed about things Tom. If you are trying to convey that things are being done in a bipartisan method with these hearings then you are uninformed, or misstating the facts to suit your desired representation of things. A couple of days ago I was shocked to witness a House Democrat on TV say as much about how the information was being handed out to the other side.

Dude, you're just plain wrong! These meetings are of house committees with Republicans who sit on those committees in attendance. They follow house rules and those GOP members are allotted time to question witnesses.

Now, if you have actual evidence to the contrary of what is happening, I'll gladly look at it.

But if you're claiming that there are more D's in the room than R's, you don't know how things work. Elections have consequences. The D's get more members because they hold the majority in the house. Elections have consequences I've been told.

Evidence be damned Tom. You have already made up your mind. The light of day is the best disinfectant. I'm not going to waste time looking up stuff that you yourself could if you wanted to genuinely know the truth. That said here is a quick one from today that should at the very least make you go hummmm if you are as righteous about the truth as you seemingly want to appear to be.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/poli...997318002/

Evidence? Did you even read your article?

Quote:WASHINGTON – A half-dozen Republican lawmakers sought access Wednesday to a closed-door deposition with a former State Department official that is part of the House impeachment inquiry, but they were blocked in an escalation of the partisan dispute over the investigation of President Donald Trump.

Three House committees – Foreign Affairs, Intelligence and Oversight and Reform – have been meeting privately for weeks with current and former administration officials to gather information about how Trump urged Ukraine to investigate Joe Biden, a political rival. The latest session Wednesday was with Michael McKinley, a former senior adviser to Secretary of State Mike Pompeo. A previous witness, Kurt Volker, a former special envoy to Ukraine, appeared Wednesday to review the transcript from his session Oct. 3.

Republicans have complained that the meetings should be public and transcripts should be released. Access has been limited to members of the three panels, which prevented one Republican from attending Monday and the half-dozen Wednesday. Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif., said private sessions are needed to prevent witnesses from hearing each other, the same protocol used by prosecutors in criminal investigations.

These committees have GOP members on them. ALL OF THEM! And it looks like one member missed a meeting or two. Wow. Sound the alarms!

(10-23-2019 02:56 PM)gobluebigjon Wrote:  Haha I’m just me.

Best to ignore trolls.

Quote:I'm not going to waste time looking up stuff

/end discussion with ODUBBall.

(10-23-2019 03:02 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-23-2019 02:56 PM)gobluebigjon Wrote:  Haha I’m just me.

Best to ignore trolls.

Says the biggest troll out there..

By the way, why are they going to arrest Barr again?

Quote:7. Hillary Brought Her Blackberry Into A Secure State Department Area. Here’s the FBI again: “State Diplomatic Security Service (DS) instructed Clinton that because her office was in a [Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility], the use of mobile devices in her office was prohibited…Clinton stored her personal BlackBerry in a desk drawer in DS ‘Post 1,’ which was located within the SCIF on Mahogany Row.”

New FBI Documents Show Hillary Was OBVIOUSLY A Criminal. Here Are The Top 11 Revelations.

THAT WAS THEN!

(10-23-2019 02:54 PM)gobluebigjon Wrote:  

(10-23-2019 02:52 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Thread.

It’s sad they did that and it’s even worse good people are defending it.

Perhaps do a bit more research on your precious Mieke before you embarrass yourself.

Also, quit responding to yourself.