(10-21-2019 11:26 AM)bullet Wrote: (10-21-2019 10:35 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote: (10-21-2019 10:28 AM)TrueBlueDrew Wrote: That article is a gigantic sack of **** and here’s why:
The author is clearly uneducated on the topic and extremely slanted, the kind of garbage journalism one has come to expect from The Federalist. In the very first paragraph, she lays out her bias that being LGBT is all about sex and that people who are in LGBT relationships are to be considered less-than when compared to “sexually faithful biological parents.”
She then goes on to try to rationalize how teaching students that same sex couples exist and that’s okay is akin to teaching them sexual positions by saying things like “sexual attraction is not the same as love.” People who oversexualize those in LGBT relationships usually have some personal issues within themselves that they need to work out, and if the author is currently in a marriage where sexual attraction and love are two different things, I feel very sorry for her. She then goes on the ramble about how it should be considered Sex Ed even though the material doesn’t mention intercourse at all, again trying to draw the distinction that gay people are sexually deviant.
Oversexualizing LGBT relationships, lumping pedophiles in with the LGBT, and the slippery-slope to beastiality argument have been common scare tactics from the far right for the last century. The reality is that most gay couples have the same aspirations as straight couples of finding love, starting a family, and building a life together.
No, it isn't nearly that complicated. It's simply projecting mental illness onto 3-5 year olds.
Rather succinct explanation. In a little more wordy way:
Discussing this with pre-schoolers is 100% not age appropriate. Hiding the timing of the class from the parents is 100% not appropriate. Forcing pre-schoolers to take it against their parent's wishes is 100% not appropriate. And yes, all this stuff is ultimately about sex which the children at that age don't understand.
The Federalist is always very logical. Some people just don't like the opinions and so attack the messenger. That's what people do when they can't justify their argument with logic.
Bullet, it's all about cramming the kids brains with the social agenda of the world before parents in the nuclear family teach them their values, assuming the parents have any values or not.
IMO, there is no clearer indication of the recruitment to a life style than the pre-conditioning of non sexualized children to receptivity of a lifestyle that many Americans still hold to be unacceptable or immoral. The LGBTQ issue has never been about equal rights. It's always been about access to your children. They have equal rights, the right to same sex marriage, and the other things they claimed made them less than equal. Now they want your children to first think they are normal, and second to be receptive to their message. And the manipulation here is that if you try to prevent it then you are the hater, the oppressor, and the one who is immoral.
There is no way in hell that any kids under the age of 10 need to be learning a thing about sex. Before kids reach puberty the only thing they need to know is to tell somebody they trust when someone tries to touch them inappropriately or when a stranger offers them candy, etc.
Once puberty kicks in and they become aware of their sexuality then biology class can teach them about reproduction, and disease. But even then they don't need anyone telling them what to experiment with or telling them if they don't try the other side that they are homophobic, all of which are current manipulations.
If kids are going to turn out to be gay or lesbian they will know it soon enough and school guidance counselors and parental involvement can take it from there. But we aren't even talking about 1 in 10 children which is why this is really all about recruitment and the recruitment isn't for LGBTQ rights, or even sex. It's about enhancing political power.
So this crap is way off the field of play, let alone way off base.
How did this happen?
The schools started teaching our kids all of the bad things this country had done rather than the good things, or even both the good and bad.
Parents did nothing.
The schools then started teaching the kids that whites were bad and focused on the positive contributions of minorities while focusing on the past sins of some whites.
Parents did nothing.
Then the schools claimed the right to question your children about their discipline at home and involving Family and Children's services when the school did not approve of home discipline.
Parents did nothing.
Then the schools started pushing the LGBTQ agenda at the High School science level.
Parents did nothing.
Then Heather Has Two Mommies appeared on Elementary school reading lists.
Parents did nothing.
Now they want to precondition your preschoolers to sexual orientations they are not even thinking about.
Just what the hell does it take to wake people up as to the godless, amoral, political agenda of Public Education? We are long past the point of telling these people where to get off!
The sad part is that it isn't really even about the LGBTQ community, or whites, or minorities. These are all core value issues and identity issues and the attack upon them is aimed precisely at overturning capitalism, the religious nature of the core values of the country, and to accomplish it by the preconditioning of our children by socialist adversaries utilizing public education against us. And any defense of our core values becomes a damned hate crime. Hello Gulliver the Communist Liliputians have tied you down with all manner of bureaucratic resolutions and now control your children.
/
Illinois LGBT indoctrination to pre-schoolers
