One issue is that there isnt an NCAAPA to negotiate licensing contracts with entities like EA Sports. The other issue is the potential with transfer portal *******. Imagine Levar Ball type of dad threatening to transfer his kid because Memphis car dealerships pay more than Austin ones..



Edit: Language

Things that were supposed to end college football...
-Desegregation
-Television
-The Miami Hurricanes
-Conference Realignment
-BCS
-The Playoffs
-Uptempo Offense
-Conference Championships
-Forward passing
-The Portal
-The Graduate Transfer Rule
-Overtime
-Instant Replay

I would bet you can add this to the list of things that should end college football... but won't.

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/10/29/richard-...sh-in.html

Everyone's scared of a monster that they don't know what it is yet. Wait until a structure comes out before losing your minds.

Pride | Passion | Purpose

(10-29-2019 06:55 PM)panama Wrote:  If you think that then you dont know what this is.

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

Well, then. What is this?

(10-30-2019 10:27 AM)StanMolsonMan Wrote:  Things that were supposed to end college football...
-Desegregation
-Television
-The Miami Hurricanes
-Conference Realignment
-BCS
-The Playoffs
-Uptempo Offense
-Conference Championships
-Forward passing
-The Portal
-The Graduate Transfer Rule
-Overtime
-Instant Replay
-NCAA clear college athletes to earn money off their names and likeness.
I would bet you can add this to the list of things that should end college football... but won't.

^^^This^^^

(10-30-2019 10:30 AM)APPrising Wrote:  https://www.cnbc.com/2019/10/29/richard-...sh-in.html

Why not? It's money athletes get from businesses fro endorsement deals. I don't see how that's not taxable income.

(10-30-2019 10:27 AM)StanMolsonMan Wrote:  Things that were supposed to end college football...
-Desegregation
-Television
-The Miami Hurricanes
-Conference Realignment
-BCS
-The Playoffs
-Uptempo Offense
-Conference Championships
-Forward passing
-The Portal
-The Graduate Transfer Rule
-Overtime
-Instant Replay

I would bet you can add this to the list of things that should end college football... but won't.

None (or at least almost none) blur the lines between amateur athletics and semi-pro athletics.

(10-30-2019 01:47 PM)EigenEagle Wrote:  

(10-30-2019 10:30 AM)APPrising Wrote:  https://www.cnbc.com/2019/10/29/richard-...sh-in.html

Why not? It's money athletes get from businesses fro endorsement deals. I don't see how that's not taxable income.

(10-30-2019 10:27 AM)StanMolsonMan Wrote:  Things that were supposed to end college football...
-Desegregation
-Television
-The Miami Hurricanes
-Conference Realignment
-BCS
-The Playoffs
-Uptempo Offense
-Conference Championships
-Forward passing
-The Portal
-The Graduate Transfer Rule
-Overtime
-Instant Replay

I would bet you can add this to the list of things that should end college football... but won't.

None (or at least almost none) blur the lines between amateur athletics and semi-pro athletics.

He's not talking about taxing the money received from the athletes' names, rather their athletic scholarship income.

If any ULL players get a cut, maybe they can afford to donate to the program.

(10-30-2019 06:13 AM)CoastalAlum2011 Wrote:  

(10-29-2019 11:28 PM)panama Wrote:  

(10-29-2019 07:19 PM)USAJag2011 Wrote:  

(10-29-2019 06:55 PM)panama Wrote:  If you think that then you dont know what this is.

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

Maybe I’m not clear on the change. It sounds like this will allow college athletes to make a profit for being a good athlete. Am I missing something? That sounds like pro football.

Owning your name and image is not the same as being paid a salary directly to play football. Additionally you will find this will affect an ifenetesibly small amount of athletes.

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

That’s literally exactly the problem.

But there is no legal basis to prevent someone from owning their name and image for monetary purposes.
.
The fact that people's image and name may differ in a marketing sense ...well thats just western capitalism.

However, nobody is going to get rich off this.


Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

What if they made it that only businesses who have a corporate office within 100 miles of the school or an athlete's home town could advertise?

What if, to gain access as an approved advertiser they also had to donate to the school.

What if to sign a deal with a male athlete you also had to advertise with a female athlete. Kinda like ticket bundles. You want Florida State tickets you also have to buy Wofford tickets.

Pride | Passion | Purpose

(10-30-2019 07:58 PM)panama Wrote:  

(10-30-2019 06:13 AM)CoastalAlum2011 Wrote:  

(10-29-2019 11:28 PM)panama Wrote:  

(10-29-2019 07:19 PM)USAJag2011 Wrote:  

(10-29-2019 06:55 PM)panama Wrote:  If you think that then you dont know what this is.

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

Maybe I’m not clear on the change. It sounds like this will allow college athletes to make a profit for being a good athlete. Am I missing something? That sounds like pro football.

Owning your name and image is not the same as being paid a salary directly to play football. Additionally you will find this will affect an ifenetesibly small amount of athletes.

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

That’s literally exactly the problem.

But there is no legal basis to prevent someone from owning their name and image for monetary purposes.
.
The fact that people's image and name may differ in a marketing sense ...well thats just western capitalism.

However, nobody is going to get rich off this.


Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

Some people are going to get very rich off of this. Some players and a lot of agents.

(10-30-2019 08:28 AM)DoubletapWolf Wrote:  

(10-30-2019 07:32 AM)runamuck Wrote:  looks like now the schools can just hook up the key players with their own fatcat alumni who can write them an endorsement check and once and for all do away with the cloak and dagger of trying to hide the transfer of cash. play for pay may have just reached the final frontier. sure one or two guys at the most visible programs may get big money but I think there will be a few guys at every school that will get a check of some kind from somebody. that local car dealer alumnus can just write a check and put a poster of the player he bought on display at the dealership.

Sounds like the old SMU . . the best team money can buy.

yes, back to the days of the free trans-ams..except now the player can just use the new cash he gets and buy whatever he wants.

(10-30-2019 07:18 AM)Arrowhead Wrote:  But big time programs boosters will be offering endorsement deals to players to get them on campus. Distance between haves and have nots just got bigger.

There will be some oversight for this. Sort of like there is now. Players can work for places but not be paid above the market rate for their service. I'd like to think Boosters will likely remain as uninvolved as their supposed to have been before.

Unless Joe Gibbs becomes a big booster for App....

Just kidding...

Sort of

this could be good.

The Sun Belt will get more exposure as being the better of the G5 conferences ahead of the MAC. Part of what plays into the perception of schools is visibility and the ratings of Sun Belt schools being higher than that of those two conferences should help drive that point home. Unless NCAA Football decides just to do a P5 version...which wouldn't surprise me.