Quote:Obviously: Notre Dame should not have been selected to play in the College Football Playoffs.
No, it's not obvious. And most would say they Did deserve to have a spot in the Top 4. You could make the argument they'd be #4 instead of #3, but that's about it. They were undefeated -- while having a P5-level schedule.
- Played no FCS teams
- Only played 4 teams under .500; the two G5s (BSU & Navy) + Florida State + USC
- Beat #7 Michigan
- Crushed #20 Syracuse
- Beat #22 @Northwestern
- They whipped 8-4 Stanford
- Beat 6-6 Vandy
- Crushed 6-6 Wake Forrest
- Crushed 6-6 VA-Tech
- They beat ACC Division Leader (albeit Pitt)
And didn't lose a game. Unless Ohio State was undefeated, or Georgia upset Alabama and Alabama moved down to bump ND out or something -- you can't make a case that ND should have been placed at #5 or lower.
Quote:Oklahoma was also a weak selection.
At first you could think they're a weak selection, but Oklahoma lost to Texas. Ohio State got THUMPED by 6-6 Purdue. Ohio State was too skitzo during the season + Oklahoma had a tougher opponent in their CCG, revenge on Texas, where Ohio State just had to play a feisty NW team in comparison. That said, I will agree that Ohio State is the #1 team I'd want facing Clemson or Alabama. Biggest chance to beat them, and are on their level -- IF they bring their A-game. But your ranking is based on what unfolded. Not Vegas betting odds right-now-if-playing.
Quote:and ( UCF if their starting QB was healthy.) We need an 8 team playoff. ( Sec, ACC, Big 10, Pac 12, AAC, Mtn.-West. and Big 12 Champions and one At-Large selection.
No, even with their healthy QB, they shouldn't have. They were ranked the same as if they had their healthy QB and didn't need a crazy comeback to win their CCG against no-defense-Memphis. They Would however, yes, get into an 8-team playoff. And I believe they should even if they were ranked the same as last year (#12) this year, as I do see UCF better last year than this year. HOWEVER...
... I do Not agree with an unconditional Conf Champ auto-selection. Especially (lol) *always* giving one to the AAC and MW no matter what. The MAC twice in somewhat recent years has had their Conf Champ better than even the improved AAC (Big East), and MW. The latter one helped prevent the "oh sh!t, there's not a good enough G5 to get the auto-bid without talks about removing it" ('16).
a) The AAC & MW aren't going to produce a high level Conf Champ every year.
b) Even the P5 Champs, when we're talking about an ELITE 8-team Playoff (not even grand bowls but PLAYOFFs; pickier) -- aren't necessarily going to be ranked all That high
Best way to do it is to forget about G5 vs P5: A max of 6 auto-bids for Conf Champs, Conditional with a max of 2 ranked lower than 8, but ranked above #x, where x is "close enough" to 8. Like #12 or #13 as the line drawn. Once in a great while, a P5 Champ will miss out. Half the years, the G5s will miss out. One in a great while, two G5s could get in (P5 conf champ upset as winner jumps up only to #15; UCF/Houston #8, other-G5-undefeated #12).
But you AVOID clear Wrongs: You can't give an auto-bid to a Conference Winner to a PLAYOFF who's *still ranked lower* than another Conference Winner who doesn't get to go. You could make a case for bowls, which is for $$ & viewership. Not for Actual Playoffs. It's a lot pickier, and understandably so.