(07-05-2018 12:55 PM)OsageJ Wrote:  

(07-03-2018 12:45 PM)JCGSU Wrote:  

(06-28-2018 04:51 PM)arkstfan Wrote:  Reporting G5 schools plus UTA and UALR.
https://247sports.com/college/arkansas-s...119439194/

ArkSt's numbers jump around more than any other schools. Reported contributions have been 2012 $84,237 2013 $403,388 2014 $1,560,468 2015 $6,281980 2016 $2,220,434 2017 $9,594,061 In 2016 ArkSt had $18M come from "other". I have a feeling ArkSt reports differently than almost anyone in the conference. Using one time large donations to big building projects as reference to the rest of the FBS is not giving a real picture.

Don't you wish Southern had that problem.

Absolutely but that is not the point. Also we have several times for the stadium expansion, baseball stadium, Bishop building, and FOC etc etc. It is why most have names on them.

Just saying for comparison sake using your one time large donations for infrequent large capital projects to the others teams is basically useless. I have no idea why ArkSt fans are getting in their feelings about common sense stuff. I dont think you are fudging the numbers I am just saying they are not typical numbers. You would have to take out the capital projects donations to see what is TYPICAL.

(07-07-2018 02:13 PM)JCGSU Wrote:  

(07-05-2018 12:55 PM)OsageJ Wrote:  

(07-03-2018 12:45 PM)JCGSU Wrote:  

(06-28-2018 04:51 PM)arkstfan Wrote:  Reporting G5 schools plus UTA and UALR.
https://247sports.com/college/arkansas-s...119439194/

ArkSt's numbers jump around more than any other schools. Reported contributions have been 2012 $84,237 2013 $403,388 2014 $1,560,468 2015 $6,281980 2016 $2,220,434 2017 $9,594,061 In 2016 ArkSt had $18M come from "other". I have a feeling ArkSt reports differently than almost anyone in the conference. Using one time large donations to big building projects as reference to the rest of the FBS is not giving a real picture.

Don't you wish Southern had that problem.

Absolutely but that is not the point. Also we have several times for the stadium expansion, baseball stadium, Bishop building, and FOC etc etc. It is why most have names on them.

Just saying for comparison sake using your one time large donations for infrequent large capital projects to the others teams is basically useless. I have no idea why ArkSt fans are getting in their feelings about common sense stuff. I dont think you are fudging the numbers I am just saying they are not typical numbers. You would have to take out the capital projects donations to see what is TYPICAL.

Again...the numbers we had for 2016 are TYPICAL. We did not have a single capital project going on.

You want high numbers? Take a look at what next years look like for us when the North End Zone donations and the Basketball Arena naming rights get included...