12 years too late.

Quote:A couple in Camillus is asking for a court’s help to get their 30-year-old son out of their house.

In filings to the Supreme Court of New York State, Christina and Mark Rotondo say they’ve been trying to get their son, Michael Rotondo, to leave their home for several months. […]

According to filings by the couple, they have been informed that because Michael is a family member, they can only have him removed from the home through an ejectment proceeding.

In a response filed to the court Wednesday, Michael Rotondo contends that the five written notices did not provide a reasonable amount of time for him to leave, citing Kosa v. Legg as precedent “that there is ‘Common law requirement of six-month notice to quit before tenant may be removed through ejectment action.” His response asserts none of the notes amount to a six-month notice.

In a previous response dated April 9, Michael Rotondo claims no cause was given for him to leave the home, that the attempts to remove him from the home are retaliatory, according to the filing. Michael Rotondo has also asserted that for the eight years he’s lived with his parents, he “has never been expected to contribute to household expenses, or assisted with chores and the maintenance of the premises, or assisted with chores and the maintenance of the premises, and claims that this is simply a component of his living agreement,” according to the filing.

Keep reading here....

I left the day after I graduated Hs at 17.....

it's hardly shocking it's a yankee wanker 'family' enviro....

it's too funny how those condescending dipshites continually look down on the south.....

they have no clue what "the south will rise again" actually means.....

in 20 years, middle/south will dominate if the cards are played correctly....

the dipshites have priced themselves out of viablity.....

PISS OFF BUGGERS

I'm sorry Mark and Chrissy but you brought this on yourselves. Freakin maroons...

Mike Rotondo...... Irwin R. Scheister???

Can they not take his stuff and throw it out or sell it ?

(05-21-2018 07:22 AM)solohawks Wrote:  Can they not take his stuff and throw it out or sell it ?

Maybe just change the locks?

Instead of wasting the court's time, how about throwing all his stuff out on the front lawn?

He'll get the message, and perhaps a bit of shame as well.

It's NY, so there's every reason to believe the laws probably favor the squatter in a "forced" eviction.

Aye ye ye.

Under that logic a kid never has to move out.

My parents made a common law agreement with me when I came out of the womb

Just crazy

(05-20-2018 11:06 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  

12 years too late.

Quote:A couple in Camillus is asking for a court’s help to get their 30-year-old son out of their house.

In filings to the Supreme Court of New York State, Christina and Mark Rotondo say they’ve been trying to get their son, Michael Rotondo, to leave their home for several months. […]

According to filings by the couple, they have been informed that because Michael is a family member, they can only have him removed from the home through an ejectment proceeding.

In a response filed to the court Wednesday, Michael Rotondo contends that the five written notices did not provide a reasonable amount of time for him to leave, citing Kosa v. Legg as precedent “that there is ‘Common law requirement of six-month notice to quit before tenant may be removed through ejectment action.” His response asserts none of the notes amount to a six-month notice.

In a previous response dated April 9, Michael Rotondo claims no cause was given for him to leave the home, that the attempts to remove him from the home are retaliatory, according to the filing. Michael Rotondo has also asserted that for the eight years he’s lived with his parents, he “has never been expected to contribute to household expenses, or assisted with chores and the maintenance of the premises, or assisted with chores and the maintenance of the premises, and claims that this is simply a component of his living agreement,” according to the filing.

Keep reading here....

It’s interesting that this dispute in the eyes of New York is viewed as some sort of implied contract—-yet one of the most basic common law requirements of a contract is “consideration” (usually labor or money). In one of his filings, the son literally argued that “no consideration” (neither money or work) was just part of the deal. That seems like a pretty dim witted argument for a lawyer to make when trying to use an “implied contract” as a defense.

(05-21-2018 08:27 AM)BadgerMJ Wrote:  Instead of wasting the court's time, how about throwing all his stuff out on the front lawn?

He'll get the message, and perhaps a bit of shame as well.

A 30 year old still living with his parents and remaining there after he was asked to leave has no shame.

I'd be embarrassed to tell people that he was my son. It's okay to help them get a leg up but it's not okay for them to place their leg on you and use it as a footstool.

This America is what we've evolved into.

Thanks Bernie.

Things just got a bit more awkward...what do you say when you pass each other in the hallway? Our lawyer will be calling you on the home phone tomorrow. Oh, please put your laundry away so Dad and I can do ours.

Well, here is the son.



Article here....

(05-22-2018 06:35 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  Well, here is the son.



Article here....

Quote:In a redacted filing, Michael said he runs his own “successful” business, calling it “the overwhelmingly superior choice for the [his] economic well being over the working of a full-time job.”

Reached by phone Tuesday, Michael confirmed he’s still bumming it at home, and would not elaborate on the nature of his business.

Bernie Sanders Internet Team Volunteer

Quote:On Tuesday, Judge Donald Greenwood ordered the parents’ lawyer Anthony Adorante to draft an order outlining terms of the eviction but allowed Michael to remain at the home until an official eviction date is set, the son said.

This guy is a real piece of work...more details in link.

Read here...

Sounds like the dad needs to grow a pair.

Quote:“It’s really unfair to me and really outrageous,” said the son — a self-described “businessman” who has a young boy of his own, of whom he lost custody.

I wonder why...

(05-22-2018 09:35 PM)UCGrad1992 Wrote:  

Quote:“It’s really unfair to me and really outrageous,” said the son — a self-described “businessman” who has a young boy of his own, of whom he lost custody.

I wonder why...

Usually not for separating sons from their father, but in this case it is a blessing.

He is waiting for his windfall. How does he pay a lawyer? With food stamps?

Quote:In 2017, Michael sued Best Buy for $338,500 for firing him two years earlier for not working Saturdays. That case is still pending.