(05-23-2018 10:08 PM)NTTHOR Wrote:  

(05-23-2018 09:58 PM)goliath74 Wrote:  

(05-23-2018 09:57 PM)HogDawg Wrote:  

(05-23-2018 09:47 PM)goliath74 Wrote:  

(05-23-2018 09:42 PM)HogDawg Wrote:  See bolded part above. WE DON'T KNOW THAT, because FAU hasn't sent those alleged "corrected" numbers to the NCAA yet. FAU even admits it. Get a clue.

But we do know that the numbers he went to print with ARE wrong. Get bent.

....because FAU submitted the wrong numbers. Go fist yourself.

And FAU had stated the numbers were wrong. BEFORE THE PRINT time. So, reporter published numbers that he knew were wrong.

simple question, did fau report the numbers that they gave to the reporter, before he published his story, with the ncaa?

I don't know the answer, because neither the article nor the FAU statement answers this question. But what we do know, is that FAU had admitted the mistake and provided a different set of numbers that is while better than the 2016/2017 numbers are still in the ballpark. Reporter chose to go with numbers that he knew were wrong and that FAU had previously admitted to be wrong.

Palm Beach Post, despite being the paper of record in Boca Raton (Palm Beach County), has a history of needlessly attacking FAU for a reason and without. I mean the neighboring South Florida Sun-Sentinel (Broward County) has a far better relationship with FAU than the Palm Beach Post.

(05-23-2018 10:24 PM)goliath74 Wrote:  

(05-23-2018 10:08 PM)NTTHOR Wrote:  

(05-23-2018 09:58 PM)goliath74 Wrote:  

(05-23-2018 09:57 PM)HogDawg Wrote:  

(05-23-2018 09:47 PM)goliath74 Wrote:  But we do know that the numbers he went to print with ARE wrong. Get bent.

....because FAU submitted the wrong numbers. Go fist yourself.

And FAU had stated the numbers were wrong. BEFORE THE PRINT time. So, reporter published numbers that he knew were wrong.

simple question, did fau report the numbers that they gave to the reporter, before he published his story, with the ncaa?

I don't know the answer, because neither the article nor the FAU statement answers this question. But what we do know, is that FAU had admitted the mistake and provided a different set of numbers that is while better than the 2016/2017 numbers are still in the ballpark. Reporter chose to go with numbers that he knew were wrong and that FAU had previously admitted to be wrong.

Palm Beach Post, despite being the paper of record in Boca Raton (Palm Beach County), has a history of needlessly attacking FAU for a reason and without. I mean the neighboring South Florida Sun-Sentinel (Broward County) has a far better relationship with FAU than the Palm Beach Post.

we are running in circles with this...but thank you for your honesty with regards to fau submitting numbers.

just because fau gives the reporter a new set of numbers doesn't mean that they are right. fau lied about the numbers and the reporter published a story based upon the ncaa approved numbers. now a new set of numbers are given...why should the reporter believe those without documentation that they have been submitted/approved by the ncaa?

you will defend you school, saying they gave the right numbers before the article ran

others will say that we can't trust those numbers because fau lied previously about them and that they haven't been submitted to the ncaa.

do you see outsiders side to this story?

(05-23-2018 10:33 PM)NTTHOR Wrote:  

(05-23-2018 10:24 PM)goliath74 Wrote:  

(05-23-2018 10:08 PM)NTTHOR Wrote:  

(05-23-2018 09:58 PM)goliath74 Wrote:  

(05-23-2018 09:57 PM)HogDawg Wrote:  ....because FAU submitted the wrong numbers. Go fist yourself.

And FAU had stated the numbers were wrong. BEFORE THE PRINT time. So, reporter published numbers that he knew were wrong.

simple question, did fau report the numbers that they gave to the reporter, before he published his story, with the ncaa?

I don't know the answer, because neither the article nor the FAU statement answers this question. But what we do know, is that FAU had admitted the mistake and provided a different set of numbers that is while better than the 2016/2017 numbers are still in the ballpark. Reporter chose to go with numbers that he knew were wrong and that FAU had previously admitted to be wrong.

Palm Beach Post, despite being the paper of record in Boca Raton (Palm Beach County), has a history of needlessly attacking FAU for a reason and without. I mean the neighboring South Florida Sun-Sentinel (Broward County) has a far better relationship with FAU than the Palm Beach Post.

we are running in circles with this...but thank you for your honesty with regards to fau submitting numbers.

just because fau gives the reporter a new set of numbers doesn't mean that they are right. fau lied about the numbers and the reporter published a story based upon the ncaa approved numbers. now a new set of numbers are given...why should the reporter believe those without documentation that they have been submitted/approved by the ncaa?

you will defend you school, saying they gave the right numbers before the article ran

others will say that we can't trust those numbers because fau lied previously about them and that they haven't been submitted to the ncaa.

do you see outsiders side to this story?

But you did not address the 800-pound gorilla in the room! Did the reporter publish numbers that HE knew were bad and that FAU has admitted were wrong BEFORE the print time?

That's it. That's all that there should ever be said.

(05-23-2018 10:53 PM)goliath74 Wrote:  

(05-23-2018 10:33 PM)NTTHOR Wrote:  

(05-23-2018 10:24 PM)goliath74 Wrote:  

(05-23-2018 10:08 PM)NTTHOR Wrote:  

(05-23-2018 09:58 PM)goliath74 Wrote:  And FAU had stated the numbers were wrong. BEFORE THE PRINT time. So, reporter published numbers that he knew were wrong.

simple question, did fau report the numbers that they gave to the reporter, before he published his story, with the ncaa?

I don't know the answer, because neither the article nor the FAU statement answers this question. But what we do know, is that FAU had admitted the mistake and provided a different set of numbers that is while better than the 2016/2017 numbers are still in the ballpark. Reporter chose to go with numbers that he knew were wrong and that FAU had previously admitted to be wrong.

Palm Beach Post, despite being the paper of record in Boca Raton (Palm Beach County), has a history of needlessly attacking FAU for a reason and without. I mean the neighboring South Florida Sun-Sentinel (Broward County) has a far better relationship with FAU than the Palm Beach Post.

we are running in circles with this...but thank you for your honesty with regards to fau submitting numbers.

just because fau gives the reporter a new set of numbers doesn't mean that they are right. fau lied about the numbers and the reporter published a story based upon the ncaa approved numbers. now a new set of numbers are given...why should the reporter believe those without documentation that they have been submitted/approved by the ncaa?

you will defend you school, saying they gave the right numbers before the article ran

others will say that we can't trust those numbers because fau lied previously about them and that they haven't been submitted to the ncaa.

do you see outsiders side to this story?

But you did not address the 800-pound gorilla in the room! Did the reporter publish numbers that HE knew were bad and that FAU has admitted were wrong BEFORE the print time?

That's it. That's all that there should ever be said.

i guess that's a no...makes sense...it's always someone else's fault

(05-23-2018 10:53 PM)goliath74 Wrote:  

(05-23-2018 10:33 PM)NTTHOR Wrote:  

(05-23-2018 10:24 PM)goliath74 Wrote:  

(05-23-2018 10:08 PM)NTTHOR Wrote:  

(05-23-2018 09:58 PM)goliath74 Wrote:  And FAU had stated the numbers were wrong. BEFORE THE PRINT time. So, reporter published numbers that he knew were wrong.

simple question, did fau report the numbers that they gave to the reporter, before he published his story, with the ncaa?

I don't know the answer, because neither the article nor the FAU statement answers this question. But what we do know, is that FAU had admitted the mistake and provided a different set of numbers that is while better than the 2016/2017 numbers are still in the ballpark. Reporter chose to go with numbers that he knew were wrong and that FAU had previously admitted to be wrong.

Palm Beach Post, despite being the paper of record in Boca Raton (Palm Beach County), has a history of needlessly attacking FAU for a reason and without. I mean the neighboring South Florida Sun-Sentinel (Broward County) has a far better relationship with FAU than the Palm Beach Post.

we are running in circles with this...but thank you for your honesty with regards to fau submitting numbers.

just because fau gives the reporter a new set of numbers doesn't mean that they are right. fau lied about the numbers and the reporter published a story based upon the ncaa approved numbers. now a new set of numbers are given...why should the reporter believe those without documentation that they have been submitted/approved by the ncaa?

you will defend you school, saying they gave the right numbers before the article ran

others will say that we can't trust those numbers because fau lied previously about them and that they haven't been submitted to the ncaa.

do you see outsiders side to this story?

But you did not address the 800-pound gorilla in the room! Did the reporter publish numbers that HE knew were bad and that FAU has admitted were wrong BEFORE the print time?

That's it. That's all that there should ever be said.

No. The story was about the WRONG numbers that FAU submitted to the NCAA. The story wasn't about FAU trying to cover their tracks with a poorly constructed retraction. And by the way, I read somewhere in these materials that the supposed "corrected" numbers have yet to be submitted to the NCAA.

But again, the article was about the wrong numbers FAU submitted to the NCAA. The fact that FAU tried to cover it up with a new set of numbers later is immaterial to the story.

(05-24-2018 11:38 PM)HogDawg Wrote:  

(05-23-2018 10:53 PM)goliath74 Wrote:  

(05-23-2018 10:33 PM)NTTHOR Wrote:  

(05-23-2018 10:24 PM)goliath74 Wrote:  

(05-23-2018 10:08 PM)NTTHOR Wrote:  simple question, did fau report the numbers that they gave to the reporter, before he published his story, with the ncaa?

I don't know the answer, because neither the article nor the FAU statement answers this question. But what we do know, is that FAU had admitted the mistake and provided a different set of numbers that is while better than the 2016/2017 numbers are still in the ballpark. Reporter chose to go with numbers that he knew were wrong and that FAU had previously admitted to be wrong.

Palm Beach Post, despite being the paper of record in Boca Raton (Palm Beach County), has a history of needlessly attacking FAU for a reason and without. I mean the neighboring South Florida Sun-Sentinel (Broward County) has a far better relationship with FAU than the Palm Beach Post.

we are running in circles with this...but thank you for your honesty with regards to fau submitting numbers.

just because fau gives the reporter a new set of numbers doesn't mean that they are right. fau lied about the numbers and the reporter published a story based upon the ncaa approved numbers. now a new set of numbers are given...why should the reporter believe those without documentation that they have been submitted/approved by the ncaa?

you will defend you school, saying they gave the right numbers before the article ran

others will say that we can't trust those numbers because fau lied previously about them and that they haven't been submitted to the ncaa.

do you see outsiders side to this story?

But you did not address the 800-pound gorilla in the room! Did the reporter publish numbers that HE knew were bad and that FAU has admitted were wrong BEFORE the print time?

That's it. That's all that there should ever be said.

No. The story was about the WRONG numbers that FAU submitted to the NCAA. The story wasn't about FAU trying to cover their tracks with a poorly constructed retraction. And by the way, I read somewhere in these materials that the supposed "corrected" numbers have yet to be submitted to the NCAA.

But again, the article was about the wrong numbers FAU submitted to the NCAA. The fact that FAU tried to cover it up with a new set of numbers later is immaterial to the story.

I do not care what the article was about. The article used numbers that both the reporter knew to be wrong and FAU had admitted to be wrong, which made it a hatchet job.

Nothing else even matters.

(05-24-2018 11:42 PM)goliath74 Wrote:  

(05-24-2018 11:38 PM)HogDawg Wrote:  

(05-23-2018 10:53 PM)goliath74 Wrote:  

(05-23-2018 10:33 PM)NTTHOR Wrote:  

(05-23-2018 10:24 PM)goliath74 Wrote:  I don't know the answer, because neither the article nor the FAU statement answers this question. But what we do know, is that FAU had admitted the mistake and provided a different set of numbers that is while better than the 2016/2017 numbers are still in the ballpark. Reporter chose to go with numbers that he knew were wrong and that FAU had previously admitted to be wrong.

Palm Beach Post, despite being the paper of record in Boca Raton (Palm Beach County), has a history of needlessly attacking FAU for a reason and without. I mean the neighboring South Florida Sun-Sentinel (Broward County) has a far better relationship with FAU than the Palm Beach Post.

we are running in circles with this...but thank you for your honesty with regards to fau submitting numbers.

just because fau gives the reporter a new set of numbers doesn't mean that they are right. fau lied about the numbers and the reporter published a story based upon the ncaa approved numbers. now a new set of numbers are given...why should the reporter believe those without documentation that they have been submitted/approved by the ncaa?

you will defend you school, saying they gave the right numbers before the article ran

others will say that we can't trust those numbers because fau lied previously about them and that they haven't been submitted to the ncaa.

do you see outsiders side to this story?

But you did not address the 800-pound gorilla in the room! Did the reporter publish numbers that HE knew were bad and that FAU has admitted were wrong BEFORE the print time?

That's it. That's all that there should ever be said.

No. The story was about the WRONG numbers that FAU submitted to the NCAA. The story wasn't about FAU trying to cover their tracks with a poorly constructed retraction. And by the way, I read somewhere in these materials that the supposed "corrected" numbers have yet to be submitted to the NCAA.

But again, the article was about the wrong numbers FAU submitted to the NCAA. The fact that FAU tried to cover it up with a new set of numbers later is immaterial to the story.

I do not care what the article was about. The article used numbers that both the reporter knew to be wrong and FAU had admitted to be wrong, which made it a hatchet job.

Nothing else even matters.

fau lied about their numbers ...nothing else matters

(05-25-2018 11:31 AM)NTTHOR Wrote:  

(05-24-2018 11:42 PM)goliath74 Wrote:  

(05-24-2018 11:38 PM)HogDawg Wrote:  

(05-23-2018 10:53 PM)goliath74 Wrote:  

(05-23-2018 10:33 PM)NTTHOR Wrote:  we are running in circles with this...but thank you for your honesty with regards to fau submitting numbers.

just because fau gives the reporter a new set of numbers doesn't mean that they are right. fau lied about the numbers and the reporter published a story based upon the ncaa approved numbers. now a new set of numbers are given...why should the reporter believe those without documentation that they have been submitted/approved by the ncaa?

you will defend you school, saying they gave the right numbers before the article ran

others will say that we can't trust those numbers because fau lied previously about them and that they haven't been submitted to the ncaa.

do you see outsiders side to this story?

But you did not address the 800-pound gorilla in the room! Did the reporter publish numbers that HE knew were bad and that FAU has admitted were wrong BEFORE the print time?

That's it. That's all that there should ever be said.

No. The story was about the WRONG numbers that FAU submitted to the NCAA. The story wasn't about FAU trying to cover their tracks with a poorly constructed retraction. And by the way, I read somewhere in these materials that the supposed "corrected" numbers have yet to be submitted to the NCAA.

But again, the article was about the wrong numbers FAU submitted to the NCAA. The fact that FAU tried to cover it up with a new set of numbers later is immaterial to the story.

I do not care what the article was about. The article used numbers that both the reporter knew to be wrong and FAU had admitted to be wrong, which made it a hatchet job.

Nothing else even matters.

fau lied about their numbers ...nothing else matters

And apologized and fixed them. This should have been the end of it.

why? fau lied about numbers and still haven't, to my knowledge, submitted them to the ncaa. the reporter didn't know if the numbers were true or false. fau has proved that they will lie about information

(05-25-2018 02:55 PM)NTTHOR Wrote:  why? fau lied about numbers and still haven't, to my knowledge, submitted them to the ncaa. the reporter didn't know if the numbers were true or false. fau has proved that they will lie about information

But he did know that his numbers, the numbers he went to print WERE WRONG. ANd the numbers FAU did give him, were in the ballpark of last year's numbers, so, at least they were reasonable. He went to print with numbers that were both wrong (and he knew that) AND unreasonable (he knew that, too)

his numbers were the numbers that fau reported, so he should have used those....expose fau for their lying. the ncaa submitted numbers are the correct numbers, not numbers that fau gives him that are "in the ballpark of last year's".

(05-25-2018 03:24 PM)NTTHOR Wrote:  his numbers were the numbers that fau reported, so he should have used those....expose fau for their lying. the ncaa submitted numbers are the correct numbers, not numbers that fau gives him that are "in the ballpark of last year's".

He KNEW the numbers he was going to press with were wrong and FAU had told him so. If he went to print solely to expose FAU (after they had admitted the numbers were wrong and have apologized) then the problem is no longer with FAU but with the reporter.

(05-25-2018 03:58 PM)goliath74 Wrote:  

(05-25-2018 03:24 PM)NTTHOR Wrote:  his numbers were the numbers that fau reported, so he should have used those....expose fau for their lying. the ncaa submitted numbers are the correct numbers, not numbers that fau gives him that are "in the ballpark of last year's".

He KNEW the numbers he was going to press with were wrong and FAU had told him so. If he went to print solely to expose FAU (after they had admitted the numbers were wrong and have apologized) then the problem is no longer with FAU but with the reporter.

gotta disagree, that is the perfect time to expose a liar....right after they are caught, admit it, and then try and give you new "corrected" numbers. kudos to this reporter.

do you really not see an outsiders view to this issue? do you really think that all blame is on the reporter?

(05-25-2018 08:59 PM)NTTHOR Wrote:  

(05-25-2018 03:58 PM)goliath74 Wrote:  

(05-25-2018 03:24 PM)NTTHOR Wrote:  his numbers were the numbers that fau reported, so he should have used those....expose fau for their lying. the ncaa submitted numbers are the correct numbers, not numbers that fau gives him that are "in the ballpark of last year's".

He KNEW the numbers he was going to press with were wrong and FAU had told him so. If he went to print solely to expose FAU (after they had admitted the numbers were wrong and have apologized) then the problem is no longer with FAU but with the reporter.

gotta disagree, that is the perfect time to expose a liar....right after they are caught, admit it, and then try and give you new "corrected" numbers. kudos to this reporter.

do you really not see an outsiders view to this issue? do you really think that all blame is on the reporter?

I blame the reporter in not giving us the news. He gives us bad numbers (thus - untruth), when he already knows this, the school has apologized, and offered new numbers.

I think he should be fired.

(05-25-2018 10:55 PM)goliath74 Wrote:  

(05-25-2018 08:59 PM)NTTHOR Wrote:  

(05-25-2018 03:58 PM)goliath74 Wrote:  

(05-25-2018 03:24 PM)NTTHOR Wrote:  his numbers were the numbers that fau reported, so he should have used those....expose fau for their lying. the ncaa submitted numbers are the correct numbers, not numbers that fau gives him that are "in the ballpark of last year's".

He KNEW the numbers he was going to press with were wrong and FAU had told him so. If he went to print solely to expose FAU (after they had admitted the numbers were wrong and have apologized) then the problem is no longer with FAU but with the reporter.

gotta disagree, that is the perfect time to expose a liar....right after they are caught, admit it, and then try and give you new "corrected" numbers. kudos to this reporter.

do you really not see an outsiders view to this issue? do you really think that all blame is on the reporter?

I blame the reporter in not giving us the news. He gives us bad numbers (thus - untruth), when he already knows this, the school has apologized, and offered new numbers.

I think he should be fired.

yes, he reported bad numbers that were submitted by fau...wow, school apologized...how awesome...makes it all better. he should not be fired, your fau president that allowed the lie should be fired.

fau, knowingly, submitted false numbers, yet you blame the reporter for writing a story on this? damn,....you really think your school does no wrong...

(05-25-2018 10:59 PM)NTTHOR Wrote:  

(05-25-2018 10:55 PM)goliath74 Wrote:  

(05-25-2018 08:59 PM)NTTHOR Wrote:  

(05-25-2018 03:58 PM)goliath74 Wrote:  

(05-25-2018 03:24 PM)NTTHOR Wrote:  his numbers were the numbers that fau reported, so he should have used those....expose fau for their lying. the ncaa submitted numbers are the correct numbers, not numbers that fau gives him that are "in the ballpark of last year's".

He KNEW the numbers he was going to press with were wrong and FAU had told him so. If he went to print solely to expose FAU (after they had admitted the numbers were wrong and have apologized) then the problem is no longer with FAU but with the reporter.

gotta disagree, that is the perfect time to expose a liar....right after they are caught, admit it, and then try and give you new "corrected" numbers. kudos to this reporter.

do you really not see an outsiders view to this issue? do you really think that all blame is on the reporter?

I blame the reporter in not giving us the news. He gives us bad numbers (thus - untruth), when he already knows this, the school has apologized, and offered new numbers.

I think he should be fired.

yes, he reported bad numbers that were submitted by fau...wow, school apologized...how awesome...makes it all better. he should not be fired, your fau president that allowed the lie should be fired.

fau, knowingly, submitted false numbers, yet you blame the reporter for writing a story on this? damn,....you really think your school does no wrong...

You will have show the evidence of knowingly submitting false numbers. And since you are all about accuracy this report is submitted to the Department of Education, not the NCAA. So, since you knowingly lied about your post we can disregard all of your post. Now lets just end this silly circle jerk.

Boy when a team kicks the ass of another......fans look for the silliest **** to attack that team with.


Lets clear the air here because this isn't about a article on title IX. It's about FAU kicking the ass of some fans team and they still cant get over it. Before you fans get on here and say other wise.....dont bother because its clear what your beef is really about. It doesn't matter if a S. Miss fan started the thread...hell a few of their fans can't stand it when anyone wins. So its the same as kicking their ass on the field. Especially tractor boy.


At this point FAU really should just resort to .....

SCOREBOARD post because if FAU had went 3-9 last year, this is not a topic

(05-26-2018 11:54 AM)WKUYG Wrote:  Boy when a team kicks the ass of another......fans look for the silliest **** to attack that team with.


Lets clear the air here because this isn't about a article on title IX. It's about FAU kicking the ass of some fans team and they still cant get over it. Before you fans get on here and say other wise.....dont bother because its clear what your beef is really about. It doesn't matter if a S. Miss fan started the thread...hell a few of their fans can't stand it when anyone wins. So its the same as kicking their ass on the field. Especially tractor boy.


At this point FAU really should just resort to .....

SCOREBOARD post because if FAU had went 3-9 last year, this is not a topic

Nailed it.

(05-26-2018 11:54 AM)WKUYG Wrote:  Boy when a team kicks the ass of another......fans look for the silliest **** to attack that team with.


Lets clear the air here because this isn't about a article on title IX. It's about FAU kicking the ass of some fans team and they still cant get over it. Before you fans get on here and say other wise.....dont bother because its clear what your beef is really about. It doesn't matter if a S. Miss fan started the thread...hell a few of their fans can't stand it when anyone wins. So its the same as kicking their ass on the field. Especially tractor boy.


At this point FAU really should just resort to .....

SCOREBOARD post because if FAU had went 3-9 last year, this is not a topic

or, and this will really blow your mind, i'm just trying to figure out why someone would wholeheartedly defend and then attack a reporter for reporting that their school lied about title ix stuff

trust, fau knocked the **** out of my school, twice, and the final scores weren't even indicative about the game. they were far better than my school.

i can admit a beating and a better fb team, while also questioning a lying university

(05-26-2018 07:37 PM)NTTHOR Wrote:  

(05-26-2018 11:54 AM)WKUYG Wrote:  Boy when a team kicks the ass of another......fans look for the silliest **** to attack that team with.


Lets clear the air here because this isn't about a article on title IX. It's about FAU kicking the ass of some fans team and they still cant get over it. Before you fans get on here and say other wise.....dont bother because its clear what your beef is really about. It doesn't matter if a S. Miss fan started the thread...hell a few of their fans can't stand it when anyone wins. So its the same as kicking their ass on the field. Especially tractor boy.


At this point FAU really should just resort to .....

SCOREBOARD post because if FAU had went 3-9 last year, this is not a topic

or, and this will really blow your mind, i'm just trying to figure out why someone would wholeheartedly defend and then attack a reporter for reporting that their school lied about title ix stuff

trust, fau knocked the **** out of my school, twice, and the final scores weren't even indicative about the game. they were far better than my school.

i can admit a beating and a better fb team, while also questioning a lying university

Maybe you should concentrate of what media must do - report facts. It is perfectly reasonable to expose someone for doing something badly or deceptively. But it is a rather different thing after this someone has apologized and corrected the story, especially since his job is to report the number, not provide a short lived hardly-relevant gotcha titillation.