I think there are many liberals who are genuinely well-intentioned people. I would put most of the leftists here in that category. But I think the leadership on the left--the Schumers, Pelosis, Obamas, and Reids--are a bunch of truly evil statists/collectivists, whose ultimate objective is subjugation of every citizen under an all-powerful government. Their ideal society would be The Matrix, with them in charge, of course. And I think they've duped the well-intentioned group into buying their platitudes.

The right has evil people too. But they tend to be the fringy KKK/racist types, the David Dukes, who somehow gravitate that direction. The leadership on the right strikes me as being characterized more by stupidity than evil. They lack either the sense or the guts to tell the evil fringe to go f-k off. And they republican establishment "leadership"--Boehner, McConnell, Ryan--consist of people whose leadership skills are so lacking that they couldn't lead a sex addict to a whorehouse.

I see well-meaning people on both sides, but the leadership I characterize as stupid party versus evil party. My hope is that the well-meaning folks somehow find a way to overthrow the evil and/or inept leadership, but that group seems too well entrenched for it to happen.

(04-13-2018 08:45 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  I think there are many liberals who are genuinely well-intentioned people. I would put most of the leftists here in that category. But I think the leadership on the left--the Schumers, Pelosis, Obamas, and Reids--are a bunch of truly evil statists/collectivists, whose ultimate objective is subjugation of every citizen under an all-powerful government. Their ideal society would be The Matrix, with them in charge, of course. And I think they've duped the well-intentioned group into buying their platitudes.

The right has evil people too. But they tend to be the fringy KKK/racist types, the David Dukes, who somehow gravitate that direction. The leadership on the right strikes me as being characterized more by stupidity than evil. They lack either the sense or the guts to tell the evil fringe to go f-k off. And they republican establishment "leadership"--Boehner, McConnell, Ryan--consist of people whose leadership skills are so lacking that they couldn't lead a sex addict to a whorehouse.

I see well-meaning people on both sides, but the leadership I characterize as stupid party versus evil party. My hope is that the well-meaning folks somehow find a way to overthrow the evil and/or inept leadership, but that group seems too well entrenched for it to happen.

I wouldn't describe all 4 of them that way. Obama is the ultimate narcissist who thinks he knows better and is better than everyone else, erroneously seeing himself as a benevolent monarch. Pelosi is just stupid. Schumer puts party first but has at least some good in him. Harry Reid, however, is pure evil.

https://spectator.org/how-comey-lied-abo...ump-tower/

But its not just liberals. There are moderates in DC. Comey wrote a book to prove what a despicable low life, lying piece of trash he is.

(04-12-2018 10:45 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(04-12-2018 08:38 PM)thespiritof1976 Wrote:  

(04-12-2018 08:23 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(04-12-2018 06:50 PM)UCGrad1992 Wrote:  

(04-12-2018 06:40 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  You meaning like this "tolerance and equality for all":


Get over yourselves.

Comparing a heads up that folks are on ignore on a message board vs. people tweeting liberal hypocrisy and intolerance is just a fail on your part. You reacted on emotion and not logic. That's typically how it works from the left.

So pointing out a contradiction is getting emotional but filtering out comments from others because it might hurt someone's delicate "snowflakiness" is not emotional? Again, get over yourselves.

Excuse me, "sir", but I don't owe it to you to hear what you think.

Why don't you get over yourself for a change ? (And next time, think things through before you post and make an ass of yourself)

Wasn’t talking to you snowflake, i actually read andand understood i was probably on igonore. I only used your post to point out the contradiction of the others post.

Different opinions hurt Spirit's head... it makes him sad.

The ignore function solves this by giving him a little safe space.

(04-13-2018 08:54 AM)bullet Wrote:  

(04-13-2018 08:45 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  I think there are many liberals who are genuinely well-intentioned people. I would put most of the leftists here in that category. But I think the leadership on the left--the Schumers, Pelosis, Obamas, and Reids--are a bunch of truly evil statists/collectivists, whose ultimate objective is subjugation of every citizen under an all-powerful government. Their ideal society would be The Matrix, with them in charge, of course. And I think they've duped the well-intentioned group into buying their platitudes.

The right has evil people too. But they tend to be the fringy KKK/racist types, the David Dukes, who somehow gravitate that direction. The leadership on the right strikes me as being characterized more by stupidity than evil. They lack either the sense or the guts to tell the evil fringe to go f-k off. And they republican establishment "leadership"--Boehner, McConnell, Ryan--consist of people whose leadership skills are so lacking that they couldn't lead a sex addict to a whorehouse.

I see well-meaning people on both sides, but the leadership I characterize as stupid party versus evil party. My hope is that the well-meaning folks somehow find a way to overthrow the evil and/or inept leadership, but that group seems too well entrenched for it to happen.

I wouldn't describe all 4 of them that way. Obama is the ultimate narcissist who thinks he knows better and is better than everyone else, erroneously seeing himself as a benevolent monarch. Pelosi is just stupid. Schumer puts party first but has at least some good in him. Harry Reid, however, is pure evil.

Are you aware of the current occupant at 1600?

(04-13-2018 08:54 AM)bullet Wrote:  

(04-13-2018 08:45 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  I think there are many liberals who are genuinely well-intentioned people. I would put most of the leftists here in that category. But I think the leadership on the left--the Schumers, Pelosis, Obamas, and Reids--are a bunch of truly evil statists/collectivists, whose ultimate objective is subjugation of every citizen under an all-powerful government. Their ideal society would be The Matrix, with them in charge, of course. And I think they've duped the well-intentioned group into buying their platitudes.
The right has evil people too. But they tend to be the fringy KKK/racist types, the David Dukes, who somehow gravitate that direction. The leadership on the right strikes me as being characterized more by stupidity than evil. They lack either the sense or the guts to tell the evil fringe to go f-k off. And they republican establishment "leadership"--Boehner, McConnell, Ryan--consist of people whose leadership skills are so lacking that they couldn't lead a sex addict to a whorehouse.
I see well-meaning people on both sides, but the leadership I characterize as stupid party versus evil party. My hope is that the well-meaning folks somehow find a way to overthrow the evil and/or inept leadership, but that group seems too well entrenched for it to happen.

I wouldn't describe all 4 of them that way. Obama is the ultimate narcissist who thinks he knows better and is better than everyone else, erroneously seeing himself as a benevolent monarch. Pelosi is just stupid. Schumer puts party first but has at least some good in him. Harry Reid, however, is pure evil.

I've not seen the good in Schumer. I think of him as Machiavelli--the historic one, not the one on this board.

(04-13-2018 07:29 AM)Paul M Wrote:  

(04-12-2018 06:50 PM)UCGrad1992 Wrote:  

(04-12-2018 06:40 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(04-12-2018 06:33 PM)UCGrad1992 Wrote:  The liberal mindset of "tolerance and equality for all" is nothing of the sort. It comes with conditions and boxes that must be checked. This isn't shocking anymore. Sad.

You meaning like this "tolerance and equality for all":

Quote:BTW: To the usual liberals here, don't bother responding to me unless you want to waste your time. I have all of you on ignore for my mental health and sanity.

Get over yourselves.

Comparing a heads up that folks are on ignore on a message board vs. people tweeting liberal hypocrisy and intolerance is just a fail on your part. You reacted on emotion and not logic. That's typically how it works from the left.

Actually thespiritof admits his decision to ignore everyone who's not a mirror of himself is emotion based. Mr_X's reply was logical.

you still with Her?

(04-13-2018 09:16 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-13-2018 08:54 AM)bullet Wrote:  

(04-13-2018 08:45 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  I think there are many liberals who are genuinely well-intentioned people. I would put most of the leftists here in that category. But I think the leadership on the left--the Schumers, Pelosis, Obamas, and Reids--are a bunch of truly evil statists/collectivists, whose ultimate objective is subjugation of every citizen under an all-powerful government. Their ideal society would be The Matrix, with them in charge, of course. And I think they've duped the well-intentioned group into buying their platitudes.

The right has evil people too. But they tend to be the fringy KKK/racist types, the David Dukes, who somehow gravitate that direction. The leadership on the right strikes me as being characterized more by stupidity than evil. They lack either the sense or the guts to tell the evil fringe to go f-k off. And they republican establishment "leadership"--Boehner, McConnell, Ryan--consist of people whose leadership skills are so lacking that they couldn't lead a sex addict to a whorehouse.

I see well-meaning people on both sides, but the leadership I characterize as stupid party versus evil party. My hope is that the well-meaning folks somehow find a way to overthrow the evil and/or inept leadership, but that group seems too well entrenched for it to happen.

I wouldn't describe all 4 of them that way. Obama is the ultimate narcissist who thinks he knows better and is better than everyone else, erroneously seeing himself as a benevolent monarch. Pelosi is just stupid. Schumer puts party first but has at least some good in him. Harry Reid, however, is pure evil.

Are you aware of the current occupant at 1600?

Doesn't hold a candle to the Divider in Chief in the narcissism category. When did Trump think he was an NBA caliber basketball player?

(04-13-2018 12:28 PM)bullet Wrote:  

(04-13-2018 09:16 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-13-2018 08:54 AM)bullet Wrote:  

(04-13-2018 08:45 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  I think there are many liberals who are genuinely well-intentioned people. I would put most of the leftists here in that category. But I think the leadership on the left--the Schumers, Pelosis, Obamas, and Reids--are a bunch of truly evil statists/collectivists, whose ultimate objective is subjugation of every citizen under an all-powerful government. Their ideal society would be The Matrix, with them in charge, of course. And I think they've duped the well-intentioned group into buying their platitudes.

The right has evil people too. But they tend to be the fringy KKK/racist types, the David Dukes, who somehow gravitate that direction. The leadership on the right strikes me as being characterized more by stupidity than evil. They lack either the sense or the guts to tell the evil fringe to go f-k off. And they republican establishment "leadership"--Boehner, McConnell, Ryan--consist of people whose leadership skills are so lacking that they couldn't lead a sex addict to a whorehouse.

I see well-meaning people on both sides, but the leadership I characterize as stupid party versus evil party. My hope is that the well-meaning folks somehow find a way to overthrow the evil and/or inept leadership, but that group seems too well entrenched for it to happen.

I wouldn't describe all 4 of them that way. Obama is the ultimate narcissist who thinks he knows better and is better than everyone else, erroneously seeing himself as a benevolent monarch. Pelosi is just stupid. Schumer puts party first but has at least some good in him. Harry Reid, however, is pure evil.

Are you aware of the current occupant at 1600?

Doesn't hold a candle to the Divider in Chief in the narcissism category. When did Trump think he was an NBA caliber basketball player?

Well, there has been a push for Gay athletes in professional sports.

(04-13-2018 11:30 AM)hoopfan Wrote:  

(04-13-2018 07:29 AM)Paul M Wrote:  

(04-12-2018 06:50 PM)UCGrad1992 Wrote:  

(04-12-2018 06:40 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(04-12-2018 06:33 PM)UCGrad1992 Wrote:  The liberal mindset of "tolerance and equality for all" is nothing of the sort. It comes with conditions and boxes that must be checked. This isn't shocking anymore. Sad.

You meaning like this "tolerance and equality for all":

Quote:BTW: To the usual liberals here, don't bother responding to me unless you want to waste your time. I have all of you on ignore for my mental health and sanity.

Get over yourselves.

Comparing a heads up that folks are on ignore on a message board vs. people tweeting liberal hypocrisy and intolerance is just a fail on your part. You reacted on emotion and not logic. That's typically how it works from the left.

Actually thespiritof admits his decision to ignore everyone who's not a mirror of himself is emotion based. Mr_X's reply was logical.

you still with Her?

Lol. Wtf is wrong with people. Guess you're drinking the pee too.

(04-13-2018 01:15 PM)Paul M Wrote:  

(04-13-2018 11:30 AM)hoopfan Wrote:  

(04-13-2018 07:29 AM)Paul M Wrote:  

(04-12-2018 06:50 PM)UCGrad1992 Wrote:  

(04-12-2018 06:40 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  You meaning like this "tolerance and equality for all":


Get over yourselves.

Comparing a heads up that folks are on ignore on a message board vs. people tweeting liberal hypocrisy and intolerance is just a fail on your part. You reacted on emotion and not logic. That's typically how it works from the left.

Actually thespiritof admits his decision to ignore everyone who's not a mirror of himself is emotion based. Mr_X's reply was logical.

you still with Her?

Lol. Wtf is wrong with people. Guess you're drinking the pee too.

Yeah...I was like...da fuq you think you're talking to!

Schumer puts party first but has at least some good in him. Harry Reid, however, is pure evil.
[/quote]

I've not seen the good in Schumer. I think of him as Machiavelli--the historic one, not the one on this board.
[/quote]

Exactly. For someone who coined every phrase that Oblunder made, i.e. immigration and the wall, and then because it's Trump he's against it all of a sudden it is pretty asinine, in the least.

(04-13-2018 01:17 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(04-13-2018 01:15 PM)Paul M Wrote:  

(04-13-2018 11:30 AM)hoopfan Wrote:  

(04-13-2018 07:29 AM)Paul M Wrote:  

(04-12-2018 06:50 PM)UCGrad1992 Wrote:  Comparing a heads up that folks are on ignore on a message board vs. people tweeting liberal hypocrisy and intolerance is just a fail on your part. You reacted on emotion and not logic. That's typically how it works from the left.

Actually thespiritof admits his decision to ignore everyone who's not a mirror of himself is emotion based. Mr_X's reply was logical.

you still with Her?

Lol. Wtf is wrong with people. Guess you're drinking the pee too.

Yeah...I was like...da fuq you think you're talking to!

It all distraction so they can get away from being called out. They could not have a better teacher then Trump.

(04-13-2018 01:17 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Yeah...I was like...da fuq you think you're talking to!

Sometimes I mix up posters. Maybe he did here. He can say if he likes. But a lot of clowns here have made these stupid leaps after 8 {edit: 10 now} years of reading posts and try to make you into someone you aren't if you wont carry pee with them.

(04-13-2018 01:36 PM)Paul M Wrote:  

(04-13-2018 01:17 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Yeah...I was like...da fuq you think you're talking to!

Sometimes I mix up posters. Maybe he did here. He can say if he likes. But a lot of clowns here have made these stupid leaps after 8 {edit: 10 now} years of reading posts and try to make you into someone you aren't if you wont carry pee with them.

I have been calling you a Cankles enabler since October of 2016.

Well you're an idiot then.

(04-12-2018 06:11 PM)thespiritof1976 Wrote:  Racist, Left wing, man hating, mewling quim shows how soulless liberalism is



BTW: To the usual liberals here, don't bother responding to me unless you want to waste your time. I have all of you on ignore for my mental health and sanity.

Thanks for linking. I blocked her on Twitter.

It is a sickness...no doubt...and there is no cure