(11-29-2017 03:35 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Good grief...the Dutch Embassy has to fact-check the mope. #winning
https://twitter.com/NLintheUSA/status/93...5249086464

LOL, the Netherlands laying their claim -- "No, no, no. He's OUR jihadi, born and raised".

Next level cuckoldry.

(11-29-2017 03:33 PM)Kronke Wrote:  

(11-29-2017 03:18 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(11-29-2017 02:42 PM)Kronke Wrote:  Interested to see how fake news contorts themselves into defending radical islam.

President Trump certainly knows how to play the game. If they are so unhinged that they are going to blindly defend whatever you say is bad, make them defend the most barbarous evil on the planet.

You realize that one of those videos is a fake right?

So, you're admitting that the other two are real? He probably included the fake one to bring more light (i.e. the angry horde) to the subject.

One is confirmed to be fake. The other two I don't know if they are real or not.

Regardless, why is Trump getting involved in this sort of fake news?

How does that help the United States?

Unless he wants a Mosque to get bombed or something.

(11-29-2017 03:38 PM)Kronke Wrote:  

(11-29-2017 03:35 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Good grief...the Dutch Embassy has to fact-check the mope. #winning
https://twitter.com/NLintheUSA/status/93...5249086464

LOL, the Netherlands laying their claim -- "No, no, no. He's OUR jihadi, born and raised".

Next level cuckoldry.

Relevant.

I used to say hind hassan was one of the few decent reporters Vice had left. Seems like she has gone completely off the rails with TDS, as well. She gets completely embarrassed/outclassed here. Sad.

(11-29-2017 03:38 PM)Kronke Wrote:  

(11-29-2017 03:35 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Good grief...the Dutch Embassy has to fact-check the mope. #winning
https://twitter.com/NLintheUSA/status/93...5249086464

LOL, the Netherlands laying their claim -- "No, no, no. He's OUR jihadi, born and raised".

Next level cuckoldry.

Omg I just fell out of my chair laughing. They surrender faster than the french.

(11-29-2017 11:22 AM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(11-29-2017 11:06 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(11-29-2017 11:03 AM)Lord Stanley Wrote:  

(11-29-2017 10:53 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  What more will it take?

For what?

For people to realize that this buffoon isn't acting presidential. He's doing long term damage to our country with his antics.

So what if it isn't acting presidential? He can act presidential when he wants to and/or needs to. In fact, he can do a better job of acting presidential than any president of my lifetime. Hillary couldn't act act all. That's another reason Trump won. To win votes, you need to act for everyone at certain times.

Ba-Da-Bing, Ba-Da Bingo

"Acting" Presidential. That's it.

Getting blown in the oral office and not "being alone" cause there was a gardener outside a window somewhere...

The socialist left has lost any credibility on this thing since the word jump. Go clean up your own backyard.

And again with the yahoo's. Isn't this isikoffs muckraking joint? My goodness.

(11-29-2017 11:47 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(11-29-2017 11:10 AM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(11-29-2017 11:06 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(11-29-2017 11:03 AM)Lord Stanley Wrote:  

(11-29-2017 10:53 AM)Fitbud Wrote:  What more will it take?

For what?

For people to realize that this buffoon isn't acting presidential. He's doing long term damage to our country with his antics.

Wait... are you saying no one prior to him brought about long term damage to our country?

I'm mean, you can't be saying that, right?

I'm not talking about policy changes. Presidents can make policy that does long term damage but those things can be fixed legislatively.

What I'm talking about is damage to the respect of the office, damage to the unity of the country. Damage to the racial and religious tolerance to the country.

What this man is doing could potentially spark serious civil unrest.

Think about it.

If Obama could make cops get shot by simply saying Treyvon could have been his son, imagine what Trump's actions are going to do.

Trump pushing more fake news. I'm shocked.

One of the videos was a white on white attack. In other words, a Christian on Christian attack. That was the one from the Nederlands. The videos came from a domestic terrorist group who assassinated that woman politician a few years ago, and the man who drove his truck into a crowd of Arabs outside of their place of warship. What Trump did was given support to a terrorist group in the UK.

He supports the terrorist in Charlottesville. Why not support these terrorist too.

(11-30-2017 01:25 AM)DavidSt Wrote:  One of the videos was a white on white attack. In other words, a Christian on Christian attack.

LOL WUT

(11-29-2017 02:42 PM)Kronke Wrote:  Interested to see how fake news contorts themselves into defending radical islam.

President Trump certainly knows how to play the game. If they are so unhinged that they are going to blindly defend whatever you say is bad, make them defend the most barbarous evil on the planet.

(11-30-2017 01:32 AM)Kronke Wrote:  

(11-30-2017 01:25 AM)DavidSt Wrote:  One of the videos was a white on white attack. In other words, a Christian on Christian attack.

LOL WUT

don't forget cb.....he's chim-chim until the 'bizzle returns for the midterms.......

dippo land has become comedy gold at the top of it's game.....

(11-30-2017 01:25 AM)DavidSt Wrote:  One of the videos was a white on white attack. In other words, a Christian on Christian attack.

Did you just assume all whites are Christians and that no Muslims are white at the same time? wow!

(11-30-2017 02:28 AM)Bull_Is_Back Wrote:  

(11-30-2017 01:25 AM)DavidSt Wrote:  One of the videos was a white on white attack. In other words, a Christian on Christian attack.

Did you just assume all whites are Christians and that no Muslims are white at the same time? wow!

They said none of the people in that one video is a Muslim. Since there was no Muslims involved, it was a fake video making a claim it is a Muslim attacking a white person which was not true.

(11-30-2017 03:01 AM)DavidSt Wrote:  

(11-30-2017 02:28 AM)Bull_Is_Back Wrote:  

(11-30-2017 01:25 AM)DavidSt Wrote:  One of the videos was a white on white attack. In other words, a Christian on Christian attack.

Did you just assume all whites are Christians and that no Muslims are white at the same time? wow!

They said none of the people in that one video is a Muslim. Since there was no Muslims involved, it was a fake video making a claim it is a Muslim attacking a white person which was not true.

But you assumed they were a Christian... You're literally just as bad as Trump..

(11-30-2017 03:01 AM)DavidSt Wrote:  

(11-30-2017 02:28 AM)Bull_Is_Back Wrote:  

(11-30-2017 01:25 AM)DavidSt Wrote:  One of the videos was a white on white attack. In other words, a Christian on Christian attack.

Did you just assume all whites are Christians and that no Muslims are white at the same time? wow!

They said none of the people in that one video is a Muslim. Since there was no Muslims involved, it was a fake video making a claim it is a Muslim attacking a white person which was not true.

Looked like a Moslem to me

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

(11-30-2017 01:25 AM)DavidSt Wrote:  One of the videos was a white on white attack. In other words, a Christian on Christian attack. That was the one from the Nederlands. The videos came from a domestic terrorist group who assassinated that woman politician a few years ago, and the man who drove his truck into a crowd of Arabs outside of their place of warship. What Trump did was given support to a terrorist group in the UK.

Terrorist group? LMAO

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

He got the British PM to condemn him. Firsts for everything.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using CSNbbs mobile app

He responded to Theresa May in one of those tweets and tagged her twitter account. But the problem is right away he tagged the wrong Theresa May. The one he picked out had 6 followers.

I'm convinced Trump has so many followers on twitter because people need a good laugh in the morning and want to find out what nonsense he tweeted overnight in one of his frequent bathroom breaks. His bladder must be even tinier than his hands. For national security reasons, Congress should pass a rule that President Trump is required to wear Depends to bed.