(09-05-2017 11:15 PM)Zorch Wrote: (09-05-2017 09:11 PM)Rocco Wrote: Callahan 2010 141.3
I also blame myself for Cluley
Callahan? I don't remember him at all (and he is relatively high on your list). Which games did he play in?
We all thought that Cluley was going to have a breakout senior season; unfortunately we were all wrong. Friends of mine will tell you that I was calling for McKee to replace Cluley near the end last year, in order to get valuable experience for this year (remember, McKee was the next best option last year; the jury is still out (on this board, anyway) on whether he is the best option this year. I don't think we will know until the Stony Brook game).
Can you pull these same stats for all the QB's prior to 2002? That would prove NJAlum's contention (which I agree with) that the QB's were better 'way back when'. I am curious where my personal favorite (Shawn Knight) would come out.
It's not readily available prior to 2002. The NCAA has stats/scanned copies of stat sheets with the top 50 players but only back to 1990 for 1-AA.
Hakel 1990: 137.1 (11th nationally)
Hakel 1991: 146.6 (10th nationally)
Knight 1992: 158.6 (6th nationally- Steve McNair was a beast that year)
Knight 1993: 204.6 (led the country and still holds the record for 1-AA efficiency- some guy named Kurt Warner was 9th)
Knight 1994: 151.3 (8th nationally)
Bryne 1995: 112.4
Cook 1996: 142.5 (12th nationally)
Fill 1997: 122.4
Cook 1998: 154.6 (6th nationally)
Corley 1999: 141.3 (17th nationally)
Corley 2000: 133.7 (I remember hating Corley a lot this season)
Corley 2001: 151.5 (8th nationally, and I remember hating Corley a lot less this season. Though I wonder what happened to the 1-AA leader that year, a dude named Tony Romo)
I'll also point out that rating doesn't take strength of opponents into account. You're going to have to pay me to start going back and doing historical adjustments. It's still apples to apples as far as I can tell but it's different kinds of apples. With the exception of 1994 and 1995 (outliers in both directions) you have a pretty consistent level of performance that continued through Campbell but fell after that and never got back up. The average rating during this period was 146.4, or a shade below Hakel's 1991 season. The average exceeds every season from 2002-present by QBs not named Lang Campbell. (This is why I get amused when people say Lang was pedestrian as a junior.) I'll leave it to the people far smarter than I am to determine if this is strategy from JL or if he's Charlie from Flowers For Algernon, but I'm concerned that this is going on at a time when passer efficiency nationally is going up.