Yes, dad.

(03-20-2017 05:43 PM)nj alum Wrote:  

(03-20-2017 05:24 PM)tribeinexile Wrote:  I guess I am just going to be that obnoxious poster without a sense of humor. I did NOT say that we should not criticize any new hire. I said we should not criticize a new hire because they are a member of a group. That is what I understood by the comment made about "PC considerations." I have not heard what else that comment could have meant but I did hear a lot of support for sex.

My comment was obviously a wasted effort and I apologize for wasting the message board's time.

You continue to be way out of line:

(1) I did not criticize the hire because SH was a member of a group.

(2) I did not criticize the hire, period.

(3) I did not say "PC considerations".

(4) I did say "There were PC aspects to today ... ".

(5) Watch the video ... listen to what was said ... there were PC aspects to that day.

I will not be tarred and "feather"ed over this, nor branded with a scarlet letter.

If this hire turns out to be a "Reveley", SH will do more than fine.

If this hire turns out to be a "Nichol", SH will have a tough time raising money ... remember ... that is what brought down Nichol.

You are not allowed to remotely even imply what is truly going on in society, otherwise you are a Misogynist, Racist or whatever other label that gets thrown around, when your opinion is slightly different from the accepted PC one.

I know exactly what you meant NJ Alum.