If it can be proven that a currently employed FBI agent leaked the info, then he/she should not just be fired .... there should be harsher repercussions that that.

(11-07-2016 03:54 PM)solohawks Wrote:  

(11-07-2016 03:39 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(11-07-2016 02:07 PM)solohawks Wrote:  

(11-07-2016 01:07 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  I wonder. Will their investigation now turn to Rudy Giuliani and who is giving him information before they are even giving it to Congress.

Link?

Really? You need a link for that? Rudy admitted it. He's not even trying to hide it.

So no link?

Nah, just another attempt to derail a thread. It's what he does.

(11-07-2016 04:21 PM)MplsBison Wrote:  If it can be proven that a currently employed FBI agent leaked the info, then he/she should not just be fired .... there should be harsher repercussions that that.

apply that same line of thinking to Clinton and what has been proven about her server and emails. [/b]

(11-07-2016 04:57 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(11-07-2016 03:54 PM)solohawks Wrote:  

(11-07-2016 03:39 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(11-07-2016 02:07 PM)solohawks Wrote:  

(11-07-2016 01:07 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  I wonder. Will their investigation now turn to Rudy Giuliani and who is giving him information before they are even giving it to Congress.

Link?

Really? You need a link for that? Rudy admitted it. He's not even trying to hide it.

So no link?

Nah, just another attempt to derail a thread. It's what he does.

Fine you want a link here it is.


No refute the link in 3..........2..............1.


http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics...-1.2858949

(11-07-2016 04:21 PM)MplsBison Wrote:  If it can be proven that a currently employed FBI agent leaked the info, then he/she should not just be fired .... there should be harsher repercussions that that.

What? Why?!?

We now have precedent that the person at the TOP of the food chain, with SAP clearance, can just set up an AOL account and freestyle with our top classified information. It was secure cause the secret service was guarding the basement it was stored in. lulz.

Hell, let's have the maid Mariel print the stuff out and make copies of it for us!

You wanna go after a poor old regular Joe?

Why do you hate working people so much?

(11-07-2016 05:02 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(11-07-2016 04:21 PM)MplsBison Wrote:  If it can be proven that a currently employed FBI agent leaked the info, then he/she should not just be fired .... there should be harsher repercussions that that.

What? Why?!?

We now have precedent that the person at the TOP of the food chain, with SAP clearance, can just set up an AOL account and freestyle with our top classified information. It was secure cause the secret service was guarding the basement it was stored in. lulz.

Hell, let's have the maid Mariel print the stuff out and make copies of it for us!

You wanna go after a poor old regular Joe?

Why do you hate working people so much?

Our resident "not a leftist" only hates the working stiffs that aren't covering up for her leftist overlords.

(11-07-2016 05:00 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(11-07-2016 04:57 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(11-07-2016 03:54 PM)solohawks Wrote:  

(11-07-2016 03:39 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(11-07-2016 02:07 PM)solohawks Wrote:  Link?

Really? You need a link for that? Rudy admitted it. He's not even trying to hide it.

So no link?

Nah, just another attempt to derail a thread. It's what he does.

Fine you want a link here it is.


No refute the link in 3..........2..............1.


http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics...-1.2858949

Boy, you really do struggle, don't you.

No, I didn't ask for a link, nor do I want a link, nor was anyone having a conversation about Giuliani.

So, as I said, just another attempt to derail the thread, it's what you do.

JMU #65,

Those fictions that you made up out of thin air might work well for the novel you're writing, but here in reality we only settle for things that actually happened.

(11-07-2016 05:00 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(11-07-2016 04:57 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(11-07-2016 03:54 PM)solohawks Wrote:  

(11-07-2016 03:39 PM)Fitbud Wrote:  

(11-07-2016 02:07 PM)solohawks Wrote:  Link?

Really? You need a link for that? Rudy admitted it. He's not even trying to hide it.

So no link?

Nah, just another attempt to derail a thread. It's what he does.

Fine you want a link here it is.


No refute the link in 3..........2..............1.


http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics...-1.2858949

Thank you.

I find it interesting that they only want to go after fbi agents for not protecting national security issues

(11-07-2016 03:03 PM)cb4029 Wrote:  

(11-06-2016 07:55 PM)Paul M Wrote:  Wasted drop.

Don't mind short bus. He doesn't know any better.

Why are you being so mean to your fellow Republicans. Just laying the smackdown left and right. I love it.

I know more than you, that's for damn sure.