(11-04-2016 06:23 AM)firmbizzle Wrote: Please explain how he let them have Eastern Europe when they defeated the German army on the eastern front?
Basically, and semi-understandable at the time, FDR's instructions were to go no further than they did on the Western Front, as so many lives were lost and there were concerns.
But even according to the generals at the time, the allies in the West could have kept going even further east faster than the Russians came through the Eastern front faster than they did, with a lot less casualties than anticipated, but FDR basically stopped them himself.
1) Reagan (particularly the first term)
2) Eisenhower
3) Nixon (although I didn't agree with some of his ideas like wage/price freezes on a national level, but he did have some major advances as already noted.)
4) T Roosevelt
5) Truman
Bush Sr., Clinton, and Coolidge almost cracked my top 5 (almost opposites - Bush's foreign policy and Coolidges US economic policies with Clinton an improvement on Bush's economic policies.)
I even thought about giving Jr. a nod in there, but just too many negatives to outweigh the positives.
I had to think about whether or not JFK would sneak into my top 5 best or worst, but his willingness to be 'stared down' by Kruschev outweighed his steps that helped push our space program and his willingness to work on bringing down disasterous tax rates in this country)
As for worsts? FDR is definitely on the top of my list. Yes, he was involved in WW2, but his authoritarianism (the threat to stack the Supreme Court in particular) was as close to despotism as I can imagine.
LBJ would clearly be my second (again, the stories (dont know if they were true or not) about his "micro-managing" of the Vietnam
war...would give me nightmares if I were in the military)
Carter slips to third, simply for bumbling and incompetence,and if I were to give LBj a pass for the Civil Rights bill, Carter would move to second.